Want to protect your cyber security and still get fast solutions? Ask a secure question today.Go Premium

x
  • Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 552
  • Last Modified:

warning: [unchecked] unchecked cast

Hi,

I get this compile error when I try to compile my class with -Xlint:unchecked

warning: [unchecked] unchecked cast
		E[] newData = (E[]) new Object[capacity];
		                    ^
  required: E[]
  found:    Object[]
  where E is a type-variable:
    E extends Object declared in class ArrayList

Open in new window

If I compile without -Xlint, I get a warning, but no error, and the program works.

But it makes me nervous. Is there some way to 'fix' this to make -Xlint happy?

Thanks.
0
Kyle Hamilton
Asked:
Kyle Hamilton
  • 4
  • 4
1 Solution
 
dpearsonCommented:
Have you tried:

E[] newData = new E[capacity] ;

Doug
0
 
Kyle HamiltonData ScientistAuthor Commented:
so, putting this in front of the constructor was supposed to eliminate this message, but it had no effect on the message I'm getting in the console:

@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")

Open in new window


I still get this message:

Note: ArrayList.java uses unchecked or unsafe operations.
Note: Recompile with -Xlint:unchecked for details.

Open in new window


oh well, apparently this is not a big deal. If anyone has any input, I would appreciate it.

Thanks.
0
 
Kyle HamiltonData ScientistAuthor Commented:
Hi Doug,

according to the book,
E[] newData = new E[capacity] ;

Open in new window

would give ma an "invalid generic type" and won't compile.
0
Independent Software Vendors: We Want Your Opinion

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

 
dpearsonCommented:
Ah - didn't know it was generic.

That's certainly harder.  If you have access to the class itself you can do:

E createObject(Class<E> clazz)
{
      return clazz.newInstance();
}

To create a typesafe instance of the class.  (If we can get that working, then need to figure out how to extend it to the whole array).

But to do that you need to pass in E.class at the time of the call to the generic method/class - can't look it up later on inside the method because E will have had its type erased.

Is that an option?

Doug
0
 
Kyle HamiltonData ScientistAuthor Commented:
Ok, so I have this in my class:

private E createObject(Class<E> clazz) throws Exception{
		return clazz.newInstance();
	}

Open in new window


and now this:

E newData = new E[capacity];

Open in new window


now the error is:

error: generic array creation
		E newData = new E[capacity];

Open in new window


Would it be helpful if I posted the whole class code?
0
 
dpearsonCommented:
OK - it looks like the one you really want is
java.lang.reflect.Array.newInstance()

which allows you to create a new array of objects of a specific type, like E.class.

More docs on it here:
http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/lang/reflect/Array.html#newInstance(java.lang.Class, int)

And a bit of tutorial on the whole thing here:
http://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/reflect/special/arrayInstance.html

Although I'm not sure this will ultimately clear the warning - as it seems
java.lang.reflect.Array.newInstance()
returns type Object
instead of type E[]
...

which looks wrong to me :)

Doug
0
 
Kyle HamiltonData ScientistAuthor Commented:
Thank you. much appreciated.

I better get outta this rabbit hole, for now.

Once I pass Level 1, I'll revisit this :) I think for now, I'm gonna live with the warning.

Cheers,
Koza
0
 
dpearsonCommented:
Haha - fair enough :)

Doug
0

Featured Post

Concerto Cloud for Software Providers & ISVs

Can Concerto Cloud Services help you focus on evolving your application offerings, while delivering the best cloud experience to your customers? From DevOps to revenue models and customer support, the answer is yes!

Learn how Concerto can help you.

  • 4
  • 4
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now