Link to home
Start Free TrialLog in
Avatar of akdit1
akdit1Flag for United States of America

asked on

Network Share permissions work in 2008, but not in 2008 R2

I have a 2008 server that had been working for years. I am moving the programs to a newer machine running 2008 R2. This program doesn't matter. The problem is with Windows permissions. I am a domain admin. On the 2008 server, I can browse to what ever folders I like, but on this 2008 R2 server, it says I must proved permissions to access each folder. Even though domain admins are listed in the security tab. When I click continue, it opens, but adds my user name to the list in the security tab. I need to give read/write permissions to a single folder \\server\group\user\data\share, but not the folders above this "share" folder. In 2008, this was working fine, now in R2 it stopped working. The user had been a member of a group with access to the shared folder, but now even with the user explicitly listed, he does not have access. If it matters \\server\group\ is a shared folder that does show up to "everyone" when you go to \\server.
Avatar of Will Szymkowski
Will Szymkowski
Flag of Canada image

From the root folder can you take ownership and then reapply the permissions accordingly? Also are you having any trust issues with this server? Have you tried to remove from the domain and then re-add it back? Also check the event logs to see if there are any errors as well.
Permissions are one of those things that tend to tedious. Are you saying that on all folders you have to provide permissions on all folders or are we only talking about the folders in this group of folders \server\group\user\data\share. For example if you want to view folders in C:\Windows and below for each new folder you go down it will ask you to provide permissions--this is Microsoft trying to keep files/folders secure. Are you familiar with icacls to manage permissions?
Avatar of akdit1

ASKER

\\server\group\user\data\share
I was already set as the owner of the parent folder "group".
The local administrators group is the owner of the subfolder "user". Domain admins is in the local admin group. I am a member of domain admins. no groups have any deny permissions.
When I browse to the folder "user" on the "x:" drive on the server, I get a pop-up message saying:
"You don't currently have permissions to access this folder.
click Continue to permanently get access to this folder."
If I click continue, it adds my account to the ACL for this folder. We try really hard not to add individual names, that's why the domain admins group was added to every folder.
If I browse to it as a network share "\\server\group\user\", it doesn't give me any trouble.
The user account that worked fine in 2008, only had permissions at the "share" level, to get it to work from a 2008 R2 server, I had to add explicit read/list contents permissions to every containing folder.

Microsoft said this is just the way it's supposed to work, but I've been lied to by support before just so they could close the ticket.

If it was just one or two users, I wouldn't care, but I've got about 100 user folders. I just finished removing explicit user permissions left from 3 previous IT users with admin rights to these folders, where, over the years, they've been in the same position I'm in. Every time I have to open a user folder, it adds my name to the ACL.

I just want to know if anyone else has/had this problem when moving from 2008 to 2008 R2. I was hoping this was a common problem and someone would just call me a dummy and tell me to disable a secret setting somewhere.
When I browse to \\server\x$\group\user\, from my domain account on Win 7, it doesn't give me any problems. So the domain admins group appears to be working when browsing this way, just not from the local server.
There are two possibly separate problems here, but I think they are the same root problem.
1) my domain admin account has to add explicit permissions to every folder to browse on local server (you say it's to protect the server, but it's not much protection if this "protection" only works when I'm accessing the server directly, but doesn't work when I'm accessing it from a remote machine) I'd like more consistent results in either direction. Either block me every way, or let me in every way.
2) user permissions that were working to access folders on this 2008 R2 server from a 2008 server, requires additional permissions to be added to the server to when accessing from a separate 2008 R2 server.

-I am not familiar with icacls
Avatar of Member_2_6515809
Member_2_6515809

ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
Avatar of akdit1
akdit1
Flag of United States of America image

Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
Avatar of akdit1

ASKER

It fixes my problem without compromising the design of my system. And most of all, it IS a solution, not just a random suggestion.
Hi akdit1,  I'm glad you were able to resolve your issue.  I'm sorry that you did not find our comments helpful.

You may refer to the following blogpost outlining how this UAC-related behaviour can be changed: http://clintboessen.blogspot.co.uk/2013/05/you-dont-currently-have-permission-to.html

It is normal behaviour.  It is UAC related.  Have a nice day :-)