Link to home
Start Free TrialLog in
Avatar of pzozulka
pzozulka

asked on

C Programming: Execl

I have a C program on the server that uses a socket to "accept" connections. However, instead of communicating back with the client via that same socket, the professor asked for slightly different requirements.

He asked to fork & execl a program to do some processing, and use that program to talk back to the client.

After forking, inside the child process, I had to override my STDIN_FILENO & STDOUT_FILENO with the ClientFD (socket), so that the execl'ed program can talk to the client via the socket. This was required (for fork'ed program to use STDOUT to talk to client).

csockfd = accept(sockfd, peerSockAddr, &peer_addr_size);
...
// Create Child Process
pid = fork();
...
if( pid == 0) {
   // duplicate client fd to stdin and stdout
   dup2(csockfd, STDIN_FILENO);
   dup2(csockfd, STDOUT_FILENO);
   close(sockfd);
   execl("process","process");
}

Open in new window

The problem is that I cannot "PRINTF()" to the console. I need to be able to output some text to the console. What's the best way to do that?
Avatar of jkr
jkr
Flag of Germany image

You could write to 'stderr' instead of 'stdout', since the latter is no longer available,e.g.

fprintf(stderr, "Hello World!\n"); // instead of 'printf()'

Open in new window

Avatar of pzozulka
pzozulka

ASKER

Is this the correct way to call execl?

execl("twist","twist","www.twitter.com","1","9000","z");

If I was the user running this, I would type:
./twist www.twitter.com 1 9000 z
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
Avatar of jkr
jkr
Flag of Germany image

Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
fprintf(stderr, "Hello World!\n"); // instead of 'printf()'

Open in new window

It gives me an error: Input/output error

Twist.c is the client program which connects to deflect.c (acting as server) using a socket. Then deflect.c forks and execl process.c, and then process.c execl twist.c. Should I have fork'd before execl twist.c?

//Inside of deflect
csockfd = accept(sockfd, peerSockAddr, &peer_addr_size);
...
if( pid == 0) {
...
dup2(csockfd, STDIN_FILENO);
dup2(csockfd, STDOUT_FILENO);
close(sockfd);

execl("process","process");
...
}

Open in new window


// Inside of process.c ----- (execl'ed by deflect.c)
void process( int csockfd, const char *conf) {
	FILE *fp=NULL;

	// Open a log file in write mode.
	fp = fopen ("/home/users1/pz951772/log.txt", "w+");
	fprintf(fp, "Logging info...\n");
	fflush(fp);
        ...
        execl("twist","twist","www.twitter.com","1","9000","z", (char *)NULL);
	exit(0);
}

int main( int argc, char *argv[] ) {
	process(STDIN_FILENO, "config.txt");	
}

Open in new window


// Inside twist.c
int main( int argc, char *argv[] ) {
   ...
   if(argc > 4) {
		fprintf(stderr, "Hello World\n"); // getting Input/output error
   }
   ...
}

Open in new window

That's weird, this should work - 'stderr' is he only standard descriptor that you haven't bound to something else. Which user(s) are your processes working under?