Link to home
Start Free TrialLog in
Avatar of sakthikumar
sakthikumar

asked on

Any way to track the changes to the DB from one point of time?

Hi,

I have done so many changes to my dev. DB. Now I have to move those changes to another DB.

I want to know whatever changes I did from a specific point of time, any way to get this?
Avatar of David VanZandt
David VanZandt
Flag of United States of America image

A broad question, let's try to focus a bit.  Assuming a current version of the product -- a database has several features to track changes:  auditing access, or who's made content changes, can be tracked -- there are simple ways, and complex ways.

In like manner, the actual content change (DML) is easily tracked if the database logs such changes (in archivelog mode).  Those logs are commonly copied to other hosts, and applied to update the database copy on those backup databases.  Oracle DataGuard is the utility used.

Oracle Flashback is also available, by which one can report the changes made to the data over time, for as long as the log copies are available.  Again, very high level mention.

But, there's no convenient way to report what, when, or by whom a data definition (DDL) was changed -- say a person with admin rights changed one column in one table in production from num(5) to num(6).  Comparison can be made, but that's not a feature commonly done in a production environment.

So, reword your question with specifics please.
Avatar of slightwv (䄆 Netminder)
slightwv (䄆 Netminder)

If you are running in archive log mode, Oracle's Logminer should be able to show you what was executed and when.

If you are licensed for it the Change Management Pack for Enterprise Manager can compare two different databases and show you what is different.  Never used it but remember reading it can do it.

You could also generate the DDL for the schema with dbms_metadata for development and production then do a compare, preferably side by side, to locate the differences.


Guess this is a learning moment for you?  You should ALWAYS track changes in development...

I take it to the extreme but it has saved me soooo many times:  I have a master SQL script that can rebuild ALL my database objects any time I want.

Whenever I'm doing development, I create a new SQL script for that patch/release/whatever.  If a change needs to be made, I modify the dev script.  Then when it comes time to move it into production it is as simple as running a script.

Then I merge the dev script into the master production script.

If you are using a software versioning/tracking tool, it is even better.  You can check in the database script with the application code for any specific release.
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
Avatar of Geert G
Geert G
Flag of Belgium image

Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
You may want to give this one a try:

http://www.liquibase.org/

It's free (open source) and looked quite suitable for me (seen on DOAG 2013 in Germany)...
SOLUTION
Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
Mike, I follow your logic about DBA_OBJECTS, but w/o the asker getting back on we're all shooting in the dark.  I don't believe that this particular view would help me know if a table column was added, for example.  And as you can appreciate, his/her system could have hundreds or thousands of transactions per minute -- manual comparison would become labor intensive and error-prone.

dvz
Hi dvz,

My take on the requirement is that the OP is asking only about differences in schema objects which he/she needs to migrate (apply) to another db and not "transactions" (data).

Therefore the missing column would be supplied from the comparison of objects between the source and target db's.
 
DBA_OBJECTS just provides the list of "suspect" objects that were either created or modified after the required date.

But you are right, without more clear requirements, we're all shooting in the dark.

:)