Solved

Cisco Wireless Controller

Posted on 2013-11-27
6
323 Views
Last Modified: 2014-01-27
I have a Cisco network enviornment.  My core switch consists of 4 3750 switches, setup in a stack configuration, tied together with stack cables on the back.  I also have a Cisco Wireless Controller 4402.  The controller is connected to the switch stack via a fiber GBIC and a multimode fiber patch cord, about 1 meter long.  For some reason the controller will be accessable on the network for a while and then drop off for a while.  This cycle is repeated over and over again, no matter how I configure the ports on either device, the controller or the switch.  

It may not be any help, but I also have this trouble with my APC UPS NIC cards.  

How do I figure out what is wrong here?

Thanks
0
Comment
Question by:wjlloyd
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 3
  • 2
6 Comments
 
LVL 46

Expert Comment

by:Craig Beck
ID: 39682290
What's in the logs on the switch stack?
Is there anything in the logs on the 4402?
0
 
LVL 79

Expert Comment

by:lrmoore
ID: 39682523
The switchport to the controller is in trunk mode?
The controller ports are not in LAG mode?
Can you post the switchport configuration?
0
 

Author Comment

by:wjlloyd
ID: 39689624
I'm not a Cisco expert so I use the Cisco Network Assistant to manage my Cisco equipment.  What commands do I need to use to obtain the log information you are requesting?  

My physical configuration is as follows:

Core Switch Stack
2 - 3750G 24T
2 - 3750 PoE-48

Remote Switch
1 - 3560 PoE-48

Wireless Controller
1 - 4402

The wireless controller is connected via a MM fiber GBIC from GigabitEthernet0/0/1 to GagabitEthernet2/0/4.
0
Webinar: MongoDB® Index Types

Join Percona’s Senior Technical Services Engineer, Adamo Tonete as he presents “MongoDB Index Types, How, When and Where Should They be Used?” on Wednesday, July 12, 2017 at 11:00 am PDT / 2:00 pm EDT (UTC-7).

 

Accepted Solution

by:
wjlloyd earned 0 total points
ID: 39799697
It turned out that I had to use the second SFP port before it would work reliably.
0
 
LVL 46

Expert Comment

by:Craig Beck
ID: 39799754
That's odd... I think you may need to upgrade the code on your WLC.  You 100% don't 'have' to use both ports, even if you do have LAG enabled.
0
 

Author Closing Comment

by:wjlloyd
ID: 39811483
In the end it is what worked.
0

Featured Post

Threat Trends for MSPs to Watch

See the findings.
Despite its humble beginnings, phishing has come a long way since those first crudely constructed emails. Today, phishing sites can appear and disappear in the length of a coffee break, and it takes more than a little know-how to keep your clients secure.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

David Varnum recently wrote up his impressions of PRTG, based on a presentation by my colleague Christian at Tech Field Day at VMworld in Barcelona. Thanks David, for your detailed and honest evaluation!
This article will inform Clients about common and important expectations from the freelancers (Experts) who are looking at your Gig.
Internet Business Fax to Email Made Easy - With  eFax Corporate (http://www.enterprise.efax.com), you'll receive a dedicated online fax number, which is used the same way as a typical analog fax number. You'll receive secure faxes in your email, f…
Monitoring a network: why having a policy is the best policy? Michael Kulchisky, MCSE, MCSA, MCP, VTSP, VSP, CCSP outlines the enormous benefits of having a policy-based approach when monitoring medium and large networks. Software utilized in this v…

726 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question