Solved

std::MAP for a string and object pointer

Posted on 2013-12-01
3
465 Views
Last Modified: 2013-12-07
map<string, Object*> objectMap;

Object *pObject1;
Object *pObject2;

pObjet1 = new Object();

objectMap["Object1"] = pObject1;

pObject2 = objectMap["Object1"] ;

For some reason the pObject1 and pObject2 not point to the same object? Why that happen? How can I assign the pObject1 address into the objectMap["Object1"] so objectMap["Object1"] will return the same address (i.e. pObject1) rather a different address (pObject2)
0
Comment
Question by:tommym121
3 Comments
 
LVL 31

Accepted Solution

by:
Zoppo earned 250 total points
ID: 39689247
Hi tommym121,

ist this the real code you use?

In the fourth line, where you create the instance, you assign it to an undeclared pObjet1 instead of pObject1 - I guess that's a typo, but if not this might be the cause of your problem.

When I replace the pObjet1 with pObjetC1 the code works as expected, i.e. when I add
      std::cout << std::hex << "pObject1 = 0x" << pObject1 << std::endl << "pObject2 = 0x" << pObject2 << std::endl;
afterward the output I recieve is something like:
  pObject1 = 0x006B7C08
  pObject2 = 0x006B7C08

ZOPPO
0
 
LVL 33

Assisted Solution

by:sarabande
sarabande earned 250 total points
ID: 39689499
I think ZOPPO is right.

if the map is the only container for "Object", you should turn the pointer type to Object type.

you could add and reference  "objects" then by

objectMap["Object1"] = Object();
Object & object2 = objectMap["Object1"] ;

Open in new window


if the Object class is intended as base class for virtual use, you have to use pointer type. however, it often makes sense to have a vector container as main container which is responsible for deleting the pointers, while the map only provides fast access to the data by key.

std::vector<Object*> objectArr;
std::vector<std::string, Object*> objectMap;
...
objectArr.push_back(new Object("Name"));
objectMap["Name"] = objectArr.back();
...
// finally delete all pointers
while (objectArr.begin() != objectArr.end())
{
      delete objectArr.back();
      objectArr.pop_back();
}
objectMap.clear(); // pointers are already deleted.

Open in new window


Sara
0
 

Author Closing Comment

by:tommym121
ID: 39703277
Thanks
0

Featured Post

Is Your Active Directory as Secure as You Think?

More than 75% of all records are compromised because of the loss or theft of a privileged credential. Experts have been exploring Active Directory infrastructure to identify key threats and establish best practices for keeping data safe. Attend this month’s webinar to learn more.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

Templates For Beginners Or How To Encourage The Compiler To Work For You Introduction This tutorial is targeted at the reader who is, perhaps, familiar with the basics of C++ but would prefer a little slower introduction to the more ad…
This article shows you how to optimize memory allocations in C++ using placement new. Applicable especially to usecases dealing with creation of large number of objects. A brief on problem: Lets take example problem for simplicity: - I have a G…
The goal of the video will be to teach the user the difference and consequence of passing data by value vs passing data by reference in C++. An example of passing data by value as well as an example of passing data by reference will be be given. Bot…
The viewer will learn how to pass data into a function in C++. This is one step further in using functions. Instead of only printing text onto the console, the function will be able to perform calculations with argumentents given by the user.

930 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question

Need Help in Real-Time?

Connect with top rated Experts

9 Experts available now in Live!

Get 1:1 Help Now