perl loop and variable

Hi,
Please see code below.
I'm trying to check the value of the $emp1, $emp2, etc... variables by using a for loop.
I thought the best way to do it (there are actually 15 different emp variables not just 4) would be to use a loop.
The error I'm getting is:
----------
Scalar found where operator expected at t.pl line 10, near "$emp$i"
(Missing operator before $i?)
-----------

I'm not understanding that error or why this isn't working. Any suggestions how I can modify the code below to make it work the way I would like?


$emp1=0;
$emp2=1;
$emp3=22;
$emp4=0;


for($i=1;$i<5;$i++){

#I thought $emp$i would resolve to  $emp1, $emp2, $emp3, etc....  but it's not.
        if($emp$i > 0){  # Error on this line
        print "emp holds a value greater then zero\n";
        }#end of if

  }#end of for
LVL 1
nachtmskAsked:
Who is Participating?

Improve company productivity with a Business Account.Sign Up

x
 
ozoConnect With a Mentor Commented:
you can use ${"emp$i"}, though I do not recommend that technique
0
 
nachtmskAuthor Commented:
Thanks ozo. Why don't your recommend it?
0
 
ozoCommented:
See `perldoc perlref`
       This is powerful, and slightly dangerous, in that it's possible to
       intend (with the utmost sincerity) to use a hard reference, and
       accidentally use a symbolic reference instead.  To protect against
       that, you can say

           use strict 'refs';

       and then only hard references will be allowed for the rest of the
       enclosing block.  An inner block may countermand that with

           no strict 'refs';
0
 
ozoCommented:
Why not use

@emp=(undef,0,1,22,0);

for( @emp[1..4] ){

#I thought $emp$i would resolve to  $emp1, $emp2, $emp3, etc....  but it's not.
        if( $_ > 0 ){  # Error on this line
        print "emp holds a value greater then zero\n";
        }#end of if
0
 
nachtmskAuthor Commented:
That's a good idea. Thanks.
I went ahead and put in 15 if statements. All I needed to do was push some values into an array if the emp$x id had a value > 0.
 Not elegant, but it works fine. If I have time I'll go back and change it to above. In a bit of a time crunch.
0
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

All Courses

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.