Link to home
Start Free TrialLog in
Avatar of Bill H
Bill H

asked on

ESX hosts

Hello,

I am moving to vmware here at the office. We have 3 physical servers and plan to grow in the future.

I am looking for Dual Quad servers w/16GB ram and I will be going with a DAS solution for storage. I am leaning towards Dell rack mount.

I was pointed in the direction of the R620 model, what do you guys think or which model do you recommend?
Avatar of asavener
asavener
Flag of United States of America image

It really depends on the workloads that you're going to be running.  Ultimately, the workloads determine how many resources you need.

You need to calculate your CPU, RAM, and disk performance requirements.
Avatar of Bill H
Bill H

ASKER

very light usage for all 3.
Then the 620 should be adequate.
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
Avatar of Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert PRO / EE Fellow/British Beekeeper)
Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert PRO / EE Fellow/British Beekeeper)
Flag of United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland image

Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
Avatar of Bill H

ASKER

Thanks for the tips. I will look into the r720.

I was looking into the MD1200 DAS for storage also.

Licensing i was thiking the essentials plus kit.
Essentials plus is a good starting place.
Avatar of Bill H

ASKER

Thoughts on the md1200?
Makes sense to keep your equipment from the same vendor.

Two things to keep in mind when designing shared storage:  capacity and performance.

Lots of people only buy for bulk storage, and they forget that they need disk IOpS, too.

If it's all domain controllers, print servers, and file servers then you're probably OK.  If you have any kind of heavy IO, like a SQL server, then you may need to dig into the numbers a little more.
Avatar of Bill H

ASKER

Yeap, sql stuff is staying physical for long term.
Avatar of Bill H

ASKER

I think with DAS storage, there is a 2TB limit on volumes?
There was with ESXi 5.1 and earlier.  I'm not sure what the current maximum is on ESXi 5.5.   I believe that the max is now 62 TB, but I could be wrong.

The bulk of VMs are on smaller datastores, anyway.
This was changed on ESXi 5.0.

You have always been able to create large VMFS data stores using extents! But this was no longered needed after 5.0.

What @asa.... is referring to "I think" is with ESXi 5.5 you can now create 62TB virtual disks! (vmdks).

which is a new feature.

See my EE Article for what's also new in 5.5!

HOW TO: What's New in VMware vSphere Hypervisor 5.5 (ESXi 5.5)
Well, it will also handle large, 64 TB LUNs on Fibre Channel.  I'm just not sure if that maximum is also true for direct-attached storage.
As long as it's on the HCL

Check the VMware Hardware Compatability Lists HCL here

The VMware Hardware Compatibility List is the detailed lists showing actual vendor devices that are either physically tested or are similar to the devices tested by VMware or VMware partners. Items on the list are tested with VMware products and are known to operate correctly.Devices which are not on the list may function, but will not be supported by VMware.

All storage is the same, FC, iSCSI, Local Storage, DAS