?
Solved

Can private data member be assigned to a global variable ?

Posted on 2013-12-09
12
Medium Priority
?
334 Views
Last Modified: 2013-12-10
/* global variable */
unsigned short available;

/* private data member of class SocketBuffer */
volatile unsigned short _avail;

/* private member function of class SocketBuffer */
unsigned short  read  ( unsigned char *dest, unsigned short length )
{
     ...
     available = _avail;    /* Is this allowed ?  */
     ....
}


 Attached is compile error.
compile-error.PNG
0
Comment
Question by:naseeam
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 6
  • 4
  • 2
12 Comments
 
LVL 86

Assisted Solution

by:jkr
jkr earned 400 total points
ID: 39707422
Technically, this is allowed. However, the nature of your error messages suggests that there is something else going on, can you post a bit more of your code?
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:naseeam
ID: 39707430
unsigned short available;   /* global variable */

class SocketBuffer
{
  public:

    /// <summary>Constructor
    /// </summary>
    SocketBuffer();
    SocketBuffer(unsigned short Buffsize); 
    /// <summary>Descructor
    /// </summary>
    ~SocketBuffer();    
    bool           isFull()    { return (_size == _avail);};
    unsigned short available() { return _avail;};
    unsigned short freespace() { return _size - _avail;};
    unsigned short size()      { return _size;};
    unsigned short dump(unsigned short size);
    unsigned short getchunksize() { return _size-_out;};
    virtual  void  reset();
    unsigned short read     ( unsigned char *dest, unsigned short length )
    { // make sure there is room in buffer
      unsigned short cnt = 0;
      if (os_mut_wait(&_mutex, 0xffff) != OS_R_TMO)
      {

        available = _avail;    

        while ((cnt < length) && (_avail))
        {
//					dbg_print("SocketBuffer::read : cnt = %d, _buf[cnt] = %X\n", cnt, _buf[cnt]);
          dest[cnt++] = _buf[_out++];
          if (_out == _size)
            _out = 0;
          _avail--;
					
        }  
        os_mut_release(&_mutex);
      }
//			tot_bytes_read += cnt;
//			dbg_print("SocketBuffer::read : total bytes read = %d  \n", tot_bytes_read);
      return cnt;
    };
    
    unsigned short write    ( unsigned char *src,  unsigned short length )
    { // make sure there is room in buffer
      unsigned short cnt = 0;
      if (os_mut_wait(&_mutex, 0xffff) != OS_R_TMO)
      {
        if (_size - _avail < length)
          length = _size - _avail;
        while (cnt < length)
        {
          _buf[_in++] = src[cnt++];
          if (_in == _size)
            _in = 0;
          _avail++;
        }  
        os_mut_release(&_mutex);
      }
      return cnt;
    };


    unsigned short isr_write    ( unsigned char *src,  unsigned short length )
    { // make sure there is room in buffer
      unsigned short cnt = 0;
			
			
      if (_size - _avail < length)
        length = _size - _avail;
      while (cnt < length)
      {
        _buf[_in++] = src[cnt++];
        if (_in == _size)
          _in = 0;
        _avail++;
				
      }
			
// debug code
			tot_bytes_in_sw_buf += length;
//			if (tot_bytes_in_sw_buf >= 796796)
////				 tot_bytes_in_sw_buf = 0;
//      }				
//      dbg_print("SocketBuffer::isr_write : total bytes in sw buffer = %ld \n", tot_bytes_in_sw_buf);	
			
      return cnt;
    };
    
  private:
    OS_MUT         _mutex;
    unsigned char *_buf;
    unsigned short _size;
    volatile unsigned short _in;
    volatile unsigned short _out;
    volatile unsigned short _avail;

};  // end of class SocketBuffer

Open in new window

0
 
LVL 86

Expert Comment

by:jkr
ID: 39707439
Hm, again, that *should* work - have you tried giving the global variable exactly the same qualifiers? E.g.

/* global variable */
volatile unsigned short available;

Open in new window


even though that does not really make sense for this one...
0
VIDEO: THE CONCERTO CLOUD FOR HEALTHCARE

Modern healthcare requires a modern cloud. View this brief video to understand how the Concerto Cloud for Healthcare can help your organization.

 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:naseeam
ID: 39707448
I just tried it.  I get the same compile error.  I'm using Keil tools.  I wonder if this is a compiler bug.
0
 
LVL 86

Expert Comment

by:jkr
ID: 39707454
Could well be possible, especially given the first error message. One shot into the dark - does this

unsigned short available;   /* global variable */

void SetValue(unsigned short us) {

  available = us;
}

// ...

    unsigned short read     ( unsigned char *dest, unsigned short length )
    { 

      // ...

     SetValue(_avail);

    // ...

    } 

Open in new window


help?
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:naseeam
ID: 39707466
created SetValue public method of same class.  Same compile error.
0
 
LVL 32

Accepted Solution

by:
phoffric earned 1600 total points
ID: 39707477
jkr's solution may work if it avoids possible name collision. I noticed that you have a number of tokens named "available", the global one and:
      unsigned short available() { return _avail;};

Then you do this:
     available = _avail;

It could be that you are trying to set the function name, available, to a value rather than the global? I would rename the function to:
     unsigned short getAvailable() { return _avail;};
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:naseeam
ID: 39707490
That worked!   Great Catch!
0
 
LVL 1

Author Closing Comment

by:naseeam
ID: 39707492
Thank you!  Changing function name compile successfully.   Genius find!
0
 
LVL 86

Expert Comment

by:jkr
ID: 39707625
Good find, Paul! ;o)
0
 
LVL 32

Expert Comment

by:phoffric
ID: 39707741
You're welcome. BTW, you might consider adopting a naming convention for global variables; e.g., possibly prefix all of them with "g_". This is useful in a multi-threading environment where that prefix serves as a flag that a mutex may be needed if the global is shared across threads.
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:naseeam
ID: 39708528
OK.  Thanks!
0

Featured Post

Technology Partners: We Want Your Opinion!

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Introduction This article is a continuation of the C/C++ Visual Studio Express debugger series. Part 1 provided a quick start guide in using the debugger. Part 2 focused on additional topics in breakpoints. As your assignments become a little more …
This article shows you how to optimize memory allocations in C++ using placement new. Applicable especially to usecases dealing with creation of large number of objects. A brief on problem: Lets take example problem for simplicity: - I have a G…
The goal of the video will be to teach the user the concept of local variables and scope. An example of a locally defined variable will be given as well as an explanation of what scope is in C++. The local variable and concept of scope will be relat…
The viewer will learn how to pass data into a function in C++. This is one step further in using functions. Instead of only printing text onto the console, the function will be able to perform calculations with argumentents given by the user.

741 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question