Want to protect your cyber security and still get fast solutions? Ask a secure question today.Go Premium

x
  • Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 256
  • Last Modified:

vb. 4.5 code "skips same line" when not attached to file for debugging

I am doing a simple update of two tables in Access 2007 after I open a form on a button click event.  The routine  updates table 1, and I call a separate sub to update  table 2.  When the code runs it updates the first table but ignores the second update sub.

Originally I had both update actions in the same sub, ran into this problem and created two separate subs to see if it would help.

When I attach the form to the vb code to debug it, everything works 100%.  I can F10 through the code, table 1 updates, the second sub fires and updates  table 2.

I then put in message boxes to try and debug this without attaching the file. To my surprise, each message box showed up and the table 2 updates.

I rebooted the system, cleaned up the disk, etc  and the code still doesn't update that second table except when I attach the file and F10 through the code

This is bizarre behavior and costing me hours of agony.

Any Ideas?
0
BROOKLYN1950
Asked:
BROOKLYN1950
  • 2
1 Solution
 
PatHartmanCommented:
Post your code please.

OOPs.  I just noticed that this is actually a .net question.  I would suggest a .net forum instead since this is an Access forum.  You may be using Jet or ACE to hold your data but you are not using Access.
0
 
GrahamMandenoCommented:
It seems clear this is a timing problem.  Have you tried putting a delay (sleep) in the code before the attempt to update the second table?  Even so, such a solution would be kludgey and unreliable.

It's hard to guess what the problem might be without seeing your code.  Certainly dividing one sub into two would make little difference as the second would run directly after the first without delay.  

I am guessing the second update action relies on changes made to another table in the first update.  If so, is there a way to rephrase the SQL (?) for the second update so it includes the changed values in the first update and does not rely on these being in the table?

Best wishes,
Graham Mandeno [Access MVP since 1996]
0
 
BROOKLYN1950Author Commented:
Thank you for trying to help.  I finally debugged it.  I had a dialog result at the end of the sub bur\t I was calling the form from a sciript file and so the process shut down before it could execute the update
0
 
BROOKLYN1950Author Commented:
Only one comment came in and I had solved it before that came in
0

Featured Post

VIDEO: THE CONCERTO CLOUD FOR HEALTHCARE

Modern healthcare requires a modern cloud. View this brief video to understand how the Concerto Cloud for Healthcare can help your organization.

  • 2
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now