Solved

Network plus exam

Posted on 2013-12-27
9
240 Views
Last Modified: 2014-01-11
Hope someone can help me with this one.  Can some one explain to me why  172.16.128.0/15  is not a private non routable ip address.   Isnt this  within the class B range within the 172.16.0.0    172.31.255.255     Ive seen this address in practice test 172.16.128.0/15 and it isnt flagged as a private address  What am I missing
0
Comment
Question by:openjohn
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
9 Comments
 
LVL 11

Assisted Solution

by:Miftaul
Miftaul earned 350 total points
ID: 39742277
RFC1918 states 3 blocks of IP for private internal use. They are

10.0.0.0/8
172.16.0.0/12
192.168.0.0/16

They are not routed because ISPs block them entering their bgp because multiple customers can have similar IP range. But in your lab, you can route them. They are not routable in a sence they should be for internal use and reserve for that.
0
 
LVL 10

Expert Comment

by:tmoore1962
ID: 39742388
Because of the subnet /15 makes the range 172.16.0.0 to 172.17.255.255 so technically its netowork  falls outside of 'private' reserved networks, think kind of a trick question.
0
 
LVL 21

Assisted Solution

by:CompProbSolv
CompProbSolv earned 50 total points
ID: 39742460
Isn't 172.16.0.0 to 172.17.255.255 (subnet for 172.16.128.0/15) completely contained within 172.16.0.0 to 172.31.255.255 (172.16.0.0/12)?  It seems to me that this IS a private non-routable address.
0
Simplifying Server Workload Migrations

This use case outlines the migration challenges that organizations face and how the Acronis AnyData Engine supports physical-to-physical (P2P), physical-to-virtual (P2V), virtual to physical (V2P), and cross-virtual (V2V) migration scenarios to address these challenges.

 
LVL 11

Accepted Solution

by:
Miftaul earned 350 total points
ID: 39742650
tmoore1962 is wrong here.

172.16.128.0/15 aka subnet 172.16.0.0 mask 255.254.0.0 (range 172.16.0.0-172.17.255.255) completely contains within 172.16.0.0/12 (range 172.16.0.0 - 172.31.255.255) private range and not routable.
---- ---- ------
Hope someone can help me with this one.  Can some one explain to me why  172.16.128.0/15  is not a private non routable ip address.  

Yes, It is a Private non routable address.

Isnt this  within the class B range within the 172.16.0.0    172.31.255.255  

Yes, it falls within.

Ive seen this address in practice test 172.16.128.0/15 and it isnt flagged as a private address  What am I missing

Practice test answer seems to be wrong here. Is Comptia selling practice tests? You know,  dumps are blindly followed by DUMBs.

/Miftaul
0
 
LVL 46

Assisted Solution

by:Craig Beck
Craig Beck earned 50 total points
ID: 39742681
The 172.16.0.0/15 range is completely private - it must be.

The 172.16.0.0/12 range is private, so a smaller mask must be contained within that range.  Check here...

http://jodies.de/ipcalc

Address:   172.16.128.0          10101100.0001000 0.10000000.00000000
Netmask:   255.254.0.0 = 15      11111111.1111111 0.00000000.00000000
Wildcard:  0.1.255.255           00000000.0000000 1.11111111.11111111
=>
Network:   172.16.0.0/15         10101100.0001000 0.00000000.00000000 (Class B)
Broadcast: 172.17.255.255        10101100.0001000 1.11111111.11111111
HostMin:   172.16.0.1            10101100.0001000 0.00000000.00000001
HostMax:   172.17.255.254        10101100.0001000 1.11111111.11111110
Hosts/Net: 131070                (Private Internet)
0
 
LVL 70

Assisted Solution

by:Qlemo
Qlemo earned 50 total points
ID: 39742978
And if you need another confirmation: Yes, it is private, The only "issue" is that 172.16.0.0/12 is usually divided into Class B subnets, which are /16, but in fact it doesn't matter as long as the mask does not exceed /12. 172.16.0.0/11 would certainly not been considered as "private" anymore.
0
 
LVL 11

Expert Comment

by:Miftaul
ID: 39751387
This post will be read by many other as it comes up in Google search.

"Because of the subnet /15 makes the range 172.16.0.0 to 172.17.255.255 so technically its network falls outside of 'private' reserved networks," is definitely not an accepted excellent answer.

(sorry I am not asking points, please don't take me otherwise)
0

Featured Post

Free NetCrunch network monitor licenses!

Only on Experts-Exchange: Sign-up for a free-trial and we'll send you your permanent license!

Here is what you get: 30 Nodes | Unlimited Sensors | No Time Restrictions | Absolutely FREE!

Act now. This offer ends July 14, 2017.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Cybersecurity has become the buzzword of recent years and years to come. The inventions of cloud infrastructure and the Internet of Things has made us question our online safety. Let us explore how cloud- enabled cybersecurity can help us with our b…
How to set-up an On Demand, IPSec, Site to SIte, VPN from a Draytek Vigor Router to a Cyberoam UTM Appliance. A concise guide to the settings required on both devices
After creating this article (http://www.experts-exchange.com/articles/23699/Setup-Mikrotik-routers-with-OSPF.html), I decided to make a video (no audio) to show you how to configure the routers and run some trace routes and pings between the 7 sites…
Monitoring a network: why having a policy is the best policy? Michael Kulchisky, MCSE, MCSA, MCP, VTSP, VSP, CCSP outlines the enormous benefits of having a policy-based approach when monitoring medium and large networks. Software utilized in this v…

691 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question