Access 2010 correctly configure tables and relationships to retrieve all records

Posted on 2014-01-02
Medium Priority
Last Modified: 2014-01-13

I have a functioning Access 2010 DB that I use to keep track of basketball teams for scouting purposes. The basic table concept/design is:
Year>School>Team>Team Summary>Game>Quarter Scores>Player Points>Players

So in any given year a school has a team (players and coaches) that play games and report scores for both the team and the players. Here's the problem.

When setting the relationships, The game table has two entries, one for the Home team, one for Visitor. I can only link from Team Summary to either Home or Visitor in the GameID table but have not been able to work out a design that would allow me to get both home and visitor records as part of the 'normal flow'.

I have been using queries to get to this data but wonder if I have overlooked a re-design that would return both home and visitor records as the result of a relational design rather than making use of queries. I have attached a pdf with the relational map.


Question by:froshcoach
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 4
  • 3
LVL 13

Accepted Solution

Norm Dickinson earned 1500 total points
ID: 39751883
Database normalization is the key to relational databases and what sets them apart from simple flat files. You seem to have gotten to a level of normalization that is one step shy of what you need to work with the data in a meaningful way, so a little redesign is probably in order. For some good tips and an overview, see http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/access-help/database-design-basics-HA010341617.aspx.

In this case you may want to rethink the division of home team / visiting team, and instead create a separate entry to reflect each game, from each team's perspective instead of just from the home team's perspective. Sure, it will give you twice as many "games" to track, but it will let you design the relationships you need. Relational databases are great at storing lots of information like that without taking up lots of extra room, so it should remain efficient.

Author Comment

ID: 39752034

I had considered separating the game table into two tables but I am still faced with the same problem.

In the current design, if I want to get all of the games played by Team A, I need to interrogate all records in the GamesID table  but the problem is looking for two fields in one record. If I split the table into two I need to check all records in two tables. I'm not sure how I can get this to cascade.

I tested splitting the game table into a home and visitor table but in datasheet view, when I click on the + sign to expand the next level after TeamSummary, I am presented with a dialog to select which table should be next in the path so I can select either home or visitor.

This would appear to be an inherent design problem as there is a split path between the team table and the next step to the game data, either home/visitor field in a record or home/visitor table. Perplexing.

Thanks tqfdotus, hope I'm not missing something simple.
LVL 13

Expert Comment

by:Norm Dickinson
ID: 39752067
Maybe if you keep the same design you have now, but give games a meaningful identifier based on whether you are recording them from the home perspective or the visitor perspective it could work. For instance, whatever you call a game now, add a single letter to the end of it to record it from the home perspective and then copy all the data to a new record, changing only the single letter designation and switching the relevant info to reflect the other team. That way when you look it up or perform calculations on the data it will be able to consolidate the information the way you want it.
Office 365 Training for Admins - 7 Day Trial

Learn how to provision tenants, synchronize on-premise Active Directory, implement Single Sign-On, customize Office deployment, and protect your organization with eDiscovery and DLP policies.  Only from Platform Scholar.


Author Comment

ID: 39752346

No matter how I look at it, this particular scenario has an either/or logic that does not lend itself to the relational nature of the DB that relies on a unique result based on a prior selection.

I just tested by combining home/visitor into one field called team with an extra yes/no field called home. This has the effect of returning all games that a team has participated in but doubles the size of the games table, two records for each game and which requires a complete redesign of forms and queries. It seems, however, that this may be the only option unless a clever solution can be found.

Thanks again,

LVL 13

Expert Comment

by:Norm Dickinson
ID: 39752362
In effect you will not be doubling the size of the game table if you only record information related to one team for each "game," but instead you will have twice as many "games" with half as much information in each.

Author Closing Comment

ID: 39777017
a general but accurate assessment of the issue
LVL 13

Expert Comment

by:Norm Dickinson
ID: 39777265
Thanks. The problem with relational databases is that if you start out on the wrong foot and have data recorded, forms and reports created and generally are using the database, it is extremely difficult to change the fundamentals without having to re-tool the rest. That would be one big advantage of a flat-file database design, albeit probably the only advantage.

Featured Post

On Demand Webinar - Networking for the Cloud Era

This webinar discusses:
-Common barriers companies experience when moving to the cloud
-How SD-WAN changes the way we look at networks
-Best practices customers should employ moving forward with cloud migration
-What happens behind the scenes of SteelConnect’s one-click button

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

This article describes how to use a set of graphical playing cards to create a Draw Poker game in Excel or VB6.
After seeing numerous questions for Dynamic Data Validation I notice that most have used Visual Basic to solve the problem. This suggestion is purely formula based and can be used in multiple rows.
The view will learn how to download and install SIMTOOLS and FORMLIST into Excel, how to use SIMTOOLS to generate a Monte Carlo simulation of 30 sales calls, and how to calculate the conditional probability based on the results of the Monte Carlo …
Two types of users will appreciate AOMEI Backupper Pro: 1 - Those with PCIe drives (and haven't found cloning software that works on them). 2 - Those who want a fast clone of their boot drive (no re-boots needed) and it can clone your drive wh…

770 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question