Solved

Hyper-V 2012 R2 and Storage QOS

Posted on 2014-01-06
10
492 Views
Last Modified: 2014-11-12
Hello ,


Im testing the Storage QOS feature of Hyper-V 2012 R2 .

As we know a simple SAS disk has about 120-150 IOPS max.

So i have a Virtual Machine and i have limit it to 150 iops.

The results i take are far worst from a physical disk with the same IOPS. Copies are veeeery slow and also if i try to copy something and in the same time try to open lets say control panel everything becomes unresponsive until the copy finishes. If i remove the qos everything works great.

Is this standard behavior ?

Thanks
0
Comment
Question by:Anestis Psomas
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 5
  • 5
10 Comments
 
LVL 120
ID: 39761446
I would not expect to see the IOPS in a virtual machine to equal the maximum number of IOPS for a single physical disk, because the I/O is virtualised inside the VM.

e.g. the virtual disk (vhd) is created on the pyhsical disk, and you are testing inside the VHD.

So I would not consider this to be strange but completey normal.
0
 

Author Comment

by:Anestis Psomas
ID: 39761483
Hello ,

Maybe you are right in case i have my VM stored inside a single physical Disk .

In my case i have a Fibre SAN with multiple disks and a lot of IOPS .

Also if we do not expect to see the IOPS of a physical disk then what do we expect? The term IO  is the same in physical and virtual disks.

Thanks for your help .
0
 
LVL 120

Accepted Solution

by:
Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert / EE MVE^2) earned 500 total points
ID: 39761567
Physical I/O and Virtual I/O is less.

Also the VM which is under a hypervisor will also perform worse, than if the server was physical.

What you can expect, is that it will be less, and not equal to physical I/O performance.

If you want physical I/O performance, present the disks via RAW Mapped LUN.
0
Does Powershell have you tied up in knots?

Managing Active Directory does not always have to be complicated.  If you are spending more time trying instead of doing, then it's time to look at something else. For nearly 20 years, AD admins around the world have used one tool for day-to-day AD management: Hyena. Discover why

 

Author Comment

by:Anestis Psomas
ID: 39761592
So if i want to emulate the iops of a physical SAS disk how much iops i must give to a VM ?


Thanks
0
 
LVL 120
ID: 39761604
if you have a single physical SAS disks, e.g. 100 IOPS (after calculating), you would need to give the VM, 100 IOPS.

But this may require you to, use RAID and JBOD techniques to increase the datastore IOPS.
0
 

Author Comment

by:Anestis Psomas
ID: 39761749
The storage i use for my tests of qos is a 3PAR Storeserv . I have present cluster volumes to my cluster from this storage. This is a fibre channel storage and it can give me maximum 16000 IOPS .

Thanks
0
 
LVL 120
ID: 39761761
So that should be plenty for your VM.
0
 

Author Comment

by:Anestis Psomas
ID: 39761810
Hello ,

of Course its plenty but this is not the point of the conversation .

 As i write earlier the question is why the 150 iops limit i put into the VM doesn't have the same behavior with 150 iops on a physical disk as the IOPS as a metric is identical in both Virtual Hard Disk and Physical Disk.
0
 
LVL 120
ID: 39761818
Okay, I think I undersatand you have limited a VM to 150 IOPS

How is the copy being performed across the network?

or local file copy?
0
 

Author Comment

by:Anestis Psomas
ID: 39761827
It is a local file copy .
0

Featured Post

NEW Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows

Backup and recover physical and cloud-based servers and workstations, as well as endpoint devices that belong to remote users. Avoid downtime and data loss quickly and easily for Windows-based physical or public cloud-based workloads!

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

The following article is comprised of the pearls we have garnered deploying virtualization solutions since Virtual Server 2005 and subsequent 2008 RTM+ Hyper-V in standalone and clustered environments.
When we have a dead host and we lose all connections to the ESXi, and we need to find a way to move all VMs from that dead ESXi host.
This tutorial will walk an individual through the process of configuring basic necessities in order to use the 2010 version of Data Protection Manager. These include storage, agents, and protection jobs. Launch Data Protection Manager from the deskt…
This tutorial will walk an individual through the process of installing of Data Protection Manager on a server running Windows Server 2012 R2, including the prerequisites. Microsoft .Net 3.5 is required. To install this feature, go to Server Manager…

739 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question