Want to win a PS4? Go Premium and enter to win our High-Tech Treats giveaway. Enter to Win

x
?
Solved

ISP redundancy issue

Posted on 2014-01-07
6
Medium Priority
?
210 Views
Last Modified: 2014-01-20
We have two internet link in a Router.

When one link fails automatically second link also getting down.

We have deployed IPSLA to track the interface..

Wil share the config shortly

Regards
Ram
0
Comment
Question by:RAMU CH
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 3
  • 3
6 Comments
 
LVL 11

Expert Comment

by:Miftaul
ID: 39764406
Do you use Routing protocol on the router or use static default routes pointing to ISP next-hop.

Which router are you using to connect to ISP.

If it is Cisco, Floating static route with IPSLA can work out here.
R1(config)# ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 1.1.1.1 track 1
R1(config)# ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 2.2.2.2 10
IPSLA commands varies with CISCO Router IOS version. We can give you exact config as we know about your router IOS.

In SonicWall, you need to go to Network - > FailOver and load balancing.  You can set Failover type here.
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:RAMU CH
ID: 39764611
Regret that not shared needful details:

Here are the details :

Device is Cisco

Model : 2800 series

version 15.0

Scenario :


         ISP1                    ISP2
                               
                \                  /
              cisco 2800 router
                       |
                    LAN




On Cisco 2800 series Router

Primary ISP details  :

Interface :  GigabitEthernet0/0
Ip address :  10.224.47.33

Secondary ISP details :

Interface :  GigabitEthernet0/0
Ip address :  10.224.47.33


About Routes are in the attached config fie.


My requirement is simple :

If primary ip fails , second isp should take care and onc eprimary comes back then traffic shouls pass over Primary ISP


Attached config file and SH version output

Regards
Ram
changed-Router-cofig.log
0
 
LVL 11

Accepted Solution

by:
Miftaul earned 2000 total points
ID: 39764679
You have a typo, your both ISP address seems to be same.
I believe the second link is at FastEthernet0/0/1 with next-hop 10.205.120.2  

You already have two IP SLA object configured
ip sla 111
 icmp-echo 10.224.47.37 source-ip 10.224.47.33
ip sla schedule 111 life forever start-time now

Open in new window

We could make it little smarter.
R1(config)# ip sla 111
R1(config)# icmp-echo 8.8.8.8 source-interface GigabitEthernet0/0
R1(config)# timeout 1000
R1(config)# threshold 2
R1(config)# frequency 3
R1(config)# ip sla schedule 111 life forever start-time now

Open in new window

It is always good to set the icmp-echo to some remote IP, not the ISP next-hop IP. Because it might be that the ISP link is up as we have connectivity but ISP might not have their upstream connectivity still showing our lin kas up.

The default route should look something link this.
R1(config)# #Static Default route to Primary ISP next hop 10.224.47.34. Due to track
R1(config)# ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.224.47.34 Track 111
R1(config)# 
R1(config)# #Static Default Route to second ISP next-hop 10.205.120.2, we increased the metric to 10 to make it floating
R1(config)# ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.205.120.2 10

Open in new window

You need to look into the many static routes that are there, some don't seem necessary
0
Veeam Disaster Recovery in Microsoft Azure

Veeam PN for Microsoft Azure is a FREE solution designed to simplify and automate the setup of a DR site in Microsoft Azure using lightweight software-defined networking. It reduces the complexity of VPN deployments and is designed for businesses of ALL sizes.

 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:RAMU CH
ID: 39764927
Thanks fot the solution

 but it makes ISP as active /standby

 but in my scenario ,

ISP links  should be Active/Active

Regards
Ramu
0
 
LVL 11

Expert Comment

by:Miftaul
ID: 39764945
Proper load sharing doesnt smartly work using static route, it works some sort using ip cef. If our intention is to keep both the links active, we could keep the above default routes. And use Policy Based Routing to route some interesting traffic over the second link.
Bgp could do that but thats not feasible here.
0
 
LVL 1

Author Closing Comment

by:RAMU CH
ID: 39793958
Tks
0

Featured Post

Technology Partners: We Want Your Opinion!

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

If you’re involved with your company’s wide area network (WAN), you’ve probably heard about SD-WANs. They’re the “boy wonder” of networking, ostensibly allowing companies to replace expensive MPLS lines with low-cost Internet access. But, are they …
Here in this article, you will get a step by step guidance on how to restore an Exchange database to a recovery database. Get a brief on Recovery Database and how it can be used to restore Exchange database in this section!
This tutorial will walk an individual through locating and launching the BEUtility application to properly change the service account username and\or password in situation where it may be necessary or where the password has been inadvertently change…
This tutorial will walk an individual through the steps necessary to install and configure the Windows Server Backup Utility. Directly connect an external storage device such as a USB drive, or CD\DVD burner: If the device is a USB drive, ensure i…

636 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question