Solved

Exchange 2013 on Hyper-V HD Setup Question

Posted on 2014-01-08
6
529 Views
Last Modified: 2016-11-23
I'm in the process of re-purposing a server that is Running SBS 2008.  I am going to install 2012 as a Hyper-v with 2 guest OS's.  The First will be 2012 Essentials R2 as a domain controller and the second guest will be Server 2012 running Exchange 2013.  There will only be 10 mailboxes on the exchange server.
My hardware is a single processor Xeon Dell T310 server with a PERC6i disk controller with 4 1TB HD's Planning on using RAID 10.

I assume that the databases from exchange should be separate from its virtual drive.

What do you recommend for the drive configuration of this setup.
0
Comment
Question by:wrfdchief
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 3
  • 2
6 Comments
 
LVL 18

Expert Comment

by:Sushil Sonawane
ID: 39767289
If you keep your exchange database in same virtual drive there is no issue. If your machine fail still you can recover your exchange database.

Please refer below link to resolve your issue.

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj619301(v=exchg.150).aspx

http://redmondmag.com/articles/2012/11/01/exchange-server.aspx

http://www.esg-global.com/lab-reports/microsoft-windows-server-2012-with-hyper-v-and-exchange-2013/
0
 

Author Comment

by:wrfdchief
ID: 39768170
Thank You for your input and the links.  I guess I need to rephrase my question a little.  With my 4 disks in a RAID 10 I will configure them as 2 virtual drives.  As far as the Hyper-V host goes it will see virtual drives C and D.  My question is, if I create a virtual instance of my exchange server (assuming it is created on host drive C) then I need to create a second virtual drive for the Exchange server to store the database but it needs to be located in the HOST drive D.  This would allow the database to be stored on a separate spindle as Microsoft recommends.

Here is the excerpt from the first link you provided:
Storage used by Exchange should be hosted in disk spindles that are separate from the storage that's hosting the guest virtual machine's operating system.

Is my logic correct (especially about creating the exchange database drive on the host drive D) or is there a different way of looking at this that I have missed.
0
 
LVL 63

Accepted Solution

by:
Simon Butler (Sembee) earned 500 total points
ID: 39768528
The way I would do this is to have two RAID 1 arrays.

Install the OS for Essentials on Disk 1
Install the OS for the Exchange server on disk 2.
Put the databases on Disk 1.

Within the Exchange VM, add an additional drive on disk 2 for the transaction and IIS logs. Does nothing for performance but if logs go mad and generate a large number in a short time, they will simply fill a disk, and not bring Windows down.

Simon.
0
Is Your DevOps Pipeline Leaking?

Is your CI/CD pipeline a hodge-podge of randomly connected tools? You’ve likely got a tool to fix one problem & then a different tool to fix another, resulting in a cluster of tools with overlapping functionality. Learn how to optimize your pipeline with Gartner's recommendations

 

Author Comment

by:wrfdchief
ID: 39769245
Thanks Simon,

Do you really think it would be better to use Raid 1 vs. Raid 10??  

One other consideration that I failed to mention.  One of the software applications that we use is based off of an older Foxpro model.  I need to store the data on a server share and a 'front end' is installed on each workstation.  Given the above setup would you think it best to install it on the essentials instance on disk 1 or install yet another server 2012 instance on the second drive and have the share there.  I know Foxpro is pretty disk intensive so not sure where the best would be.  With the 4- 1 Terabyte drives I should have plenty of space with either Raid 1 or Raid 10 wherever just not sure of the disk access issues with exchange.
I should note that my exchange usage is pretty light.  10 total users (most using active sync with their phones also) with no more than 4 logged into the system at a time.

Steve
0
 
LVL 63

Expert Comment

by:Simon Butler (Sembee)
ID: 39769424
It isn't space you are after.
Two RAID 1 arrays gives you two separate disk systems, so you have better performance.
For the FoxPro application, I can only suggest trying it on the Essentials system and see how it performs.

Simon.
0
 

Author Closing Comment

by:wrfdchief
ID: 39772458
Exactly the concise answer I needed!
0

Featured Post

Free eBook: Backup on AWS

Everything you need to know about backup and disaster recovery with AWS, for FREE!

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

The following article is comprised of the pearls we have garnered deploying virtualization solutions since Virtual Server 2005 and subsequent 2008 RTM+ Hyper-V in standalone and clustered environments.
This article aims to explain the working of CircularLogArchiver. This tool was designed to solve the buildup of log file in cases where systems do not support circular logging or where circular logging is not enabled
This tutorial will walk an individual through the process of transferring the five major, necessary Active Directory Roles, commonly referred to as the FSMO roles from a Windows Server 2008 domain controller to a Windows Server 2012 domain controlle…
This video demonstrates how to sync Microsoft Exchange Public Folders with smartphones using CodeTwo Exchange Sync and Exchange ActiveSync. To learn more about CodeTwo Exchange Sync and download the free trial, go to: http://www.codetwo.com/excha…

734 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question