Solved

network bandwidth access for web server

Posted on 2014-01-13
5
224 Views
Last Modified: 2014-02-07
Where my web server is located (call it location A) the internet (DSL) is not very fast and does not meet the bandwidth requirements. Therefore, I was thinking to have users access the web server through our other location's (call it location B) internet (different state) which is faster. Then it would route through our private WAN 1.5 T1 to get to my web server in location A.  Would this make a difference or is it the same thing since it has to go across the wan.
0
Comment
Question by:paul_techy
  • 3
  • 2
5 Comments
 
LVL 57

Expert Comment

by:giltjr
ID: 39778306
What is your DSL speed?  I is it ADSL?  If so, rember ADSL was designed for the client side access, not server side.  This is why the download speeds are faster than the upload speeds.

What is the latency on the T1 between he two sites?

Where are you users located at in relationship to location B?
0
 

Author Comment

by:paul_techy
ID: 39779953
Its actually uverse. 4-5Mbps down,  0.6-0.7Mbps up

Latency is 0% packet loss using traceroute

Location B = California
other users=California, north-central usa, east coast usa.
0
 
LVL 57

Accepted Solution

by:
giltjr earned 500 total points
ID: 39780064
O.K., you have a ADSL connection, which again is not for host services.  Your upload stream speed looks like it is a 768Kbps which is 1/2 of a T1, way to slow for hosting anything.

If you play on keeping your web server at its currently location you may want to look at getting a connection that has more upsteam bandwidth.

Latency is a measure of time, not packet loss.

You should be able to setup a test to see how it affect performance.

You can setup a new NAT at location B to forward to your web server at location A.  Then just use the IP address to get to the server and see what performance is.  

If it is acceptable, then just update the DNS entry to point to the new IP address.
0
 

Author Comment

by:paul_techy
ID: 39780087
correction:
Location B= north-central usa
Location A= california
other users=California, north-central usa, east coast usa.

Latency= 100ms

So basically, your saying to setup a new NAT at location B to forward to webserver at loation A would be the better solution unless location A gets a better internet speed.
0
 
LVL 57

Expert Comment

by:giltjr
ID: 39780333
I am saying set it up and test.  However 100 ms is a long time.
0

Featured Post

PRTG Network Monitor: Intuitive Network Monitoring

Network Monitoring is essential to ensure that computer systems and network devices are running. Use PRTG to monitor LANs, servers, websites, applications and devices, bandwidth, virtual environments, remote systems, IoT, and many more. PRTG is easy to set up & use.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

Title # Comments Views Activity
Port 808 is being blocked 9 98
DHCP Server 14 85
How can I find which network appliance is acting as our gateway with the IP address? 4 51
Internet Service Provider 3 49
Even if you have implemented a Mobile Device Management solution company wide, it is a good idea to make sure you are taking into account all of the major risks to your electronic protected health information (ePHI).
I had an issue with InstallShield not being able to use Computer Browser service on Windows Server 2012. Here is the solution I found.
Sending a Secure fax is easy with eFax Corporate (http://www.enterprise.efax.com). First, Just open a new email message.  In the To field, type your recipient's fax number @efaxsend.com. You can even send a secure international fax — just include t…
Get a first impression of how PRTG looks and learn how it works.   This video is a short introduction to PRTG, as an initial overview or as a quick start for new PRTG users.

770 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question