Solved

network bandwidth access for web server

Posted on 2014-01-13
5
225 Views
Last Modified: 2014-02-07
Where my web server is located (call it location A) the internet (DSL) is not very fast and does not meet the bandwidth requirements. Therefore, I was thinking to have users access the web server through our other location's (call it location B) internet (different state) which is faster. Then it would route through our private WAN 1.5 T1 to get to my web server in location A.  Would this make a difference or is it the same thing since it has to go across the wan.
0
Comment
Question by:paul_techy
  • 3
  • 2
5 Comments
 
LVL 57

Expert Comment

by:giltjr
ID: 39778306
What is your DSL speed?  I is it ADSL?  If so, rember ADSL was designed for the client side access, not server side.  This is why the download speeds are faster than the upload speeds.

What is the latency on the T1 between he two sites?

Where are you users located at in relationship to location B?
0
 

Author Comment

by:paul_techy
ID: 39779953
Its actually uverse. 4-5Mbps down,  0.6-0.7Mbps up

Latency is 0% packet loss using traceroute

Location B = California
other users=California, north-central usa, east coast usa.
0
 
LVL 57

Accepted Solution

by:
giltjr earned 500 total points
ID: 39780064
O.K., you have a ADSL connection, which again is not for host services.  Your upload stream speed looks like it is a 768Kbps which is 1/2 of a T1, way to slow for hosting anything.

If you play on keeping your web server at its currently location you may want to look at getting a connection that has more upsteam bandwidth.

Latency is a measure of time, not packet loss.

You should be able to setup a test to see how it affect performance.

You can setup a new NAT at location B to forward to your web server at location A.  Then just use the IP address to get to the server and see what performance is.  

If it is acceptable, then just update the DNS entry to point to the new IP address.
0
 

Author Comment

by:paul_techy
ID: 39780087
correction:
Location B= north-central usa
Location A= california
other users=California, north-central usa, east coast usa.

Latency= 100ms

So basically, your saying to setup a new NAT at location B to forward to webserver at loation A would be the better solution unless location A gets a better internet speed.
0
 
LVL 57

Expert Comment

by:giltjr
ID: 39780333
I am saying set it up and test.  However 100 ms is a long time.
0

Featured Post

Portable, direct connect server access

The ATEN CV211 connects a laptop directly to any server allowing you instant access to perform data maintenance and local operations, for quick troubleshooting, updating, service and repair.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

Title # Comments Views Activity
move expression web site to a new server 13 53
performance tune IIS 10 on win 2016 that only runs one website 4 121
Samba Question 11 75
cannot view videos at msnbc 12 36
#Citrix #Citrix Netscaler #HTTP Compression #Load Balance
In this article, I am going to show you how to simulate a multi-site Lab environment on a single Hyper-V host. I use this method successfully in my own lab to simulate three fully routed global AD Sites on a Windows 10 Hyper-V host.
Viewers will learn how to connect to a wireless network using the network security key. They will also learn how to access the IP address and DNS server for connections that must be done manually. After setting up a router, find the network security…
After creating this article (http://www.experts-exchange.com/articles/23699/Setup-Mikrotik-routers-with-OSPF.html), I decided to make a video (no audio) to show you how to configure the routers and run some trace routes and pings between the 7 sites…

856 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question