Solved

DNS Record Change for Exchange Failover

Posted on 2014-01-16
5
494 Views
Last Modified: 2014-01-31
We are looking to configure\fine tune our Exchange 2010 failover scheme. Currently we have a cas array (via a Kemp Load balancer) in production by the name of CAS00. CAS00 is the RPC server for all of our local Outlook clients.

We also have a CAS server in our disaster recovery site by the name of CAS03. We are thinking, when CAS00 in production goes down, we can manually change the DNS A record of CAS00 to point to the IP address of the DR Cas server. This way the clients still point to the CAS00 RPC server but the DR server is actually handling the exchange requests.

I was told something about creating a cname record that points record to tie into the failover scheme which would have a shorter TTL than the A record to create some sort of DNS redundancy and make the process more automated.

Can anybody shed any light as to how to accomplish this?
0
Comment
Question by:GR JN
  • 2
  • 2
5 Comments
 
LVL 36

Expert Comment

by:Mahesh
ID: 39786876
Yes, you have to change the DNS Record for the CAS Array name in DNS in order to route all connections to the DR CAS Server

Mahesh
0
 

Author Comment

by:GR JN
ID: 39786902
Yes, I know that but is it just the A record or can we tie in a cname record as well?
0
 
LVL 36

Expert Comment

by:Mahesh
ID: 39786946
Cname record is not required

You need to point your existing  CAS server \ CAS Array Host(A) record to DR CAS server

http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/exchange/en-US/704695d4-dfb2-40dd-ad58-46b34dc1aa38/exchange-2010-site-resiliency-cas-array-failover?forum=exchange2010

Mahesh
0
 
LVL 5

Accepted Solution

by:
piwowarc earned 500 total points
ID: 39801587
Hello

DNS is not "state aware" load aware mechanism. You can't achieve any failure aware system that would automatically failover to DR server. For that you need actual load balancer.

Active Load Balancing can be achieved with DNS actually. IT is frequent for high traffic and reslient deployments (do nslookup of google for ex). If you give all servers behind this Kemp LB same name, DNS will return addresses to users at random achieving load sharing. It will still be a bit worse that actual LB you have as it will still give IPs of servers that may have gone down.

In general Load Balancers are way better to do any auto failovers than using DNS.

Regards
0
 

Author Comment

by:GR JN
ID: 39824648
wa
0

Featured Post

Does Powershell have you tied up in knots?

Managing Active Directory does not always have to be complicated.  If you are spending more time trying instead of doing, then it's time to look at something else. For nearly 20 years, AD admins around the world have used one tool for day-to-day AD management: Hyena. Discover why

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

This article explains in simple steps how to renew expiring Exchange Server Internal Transport Certificate.
Scam emails are a huge burden for many businesses. Spotting one is not always easy. Follow our tips to identify if an email you receive is a scam.
The video tutorial explains the basics of the Exchange server Database Availability groups. The components of this video include: 1. Automatic Failover 2. Failover Clustering 3. Active Manager
This Micro Tutorial hows how you can integrate  Mac OSX to a Windows Active Directory Domain. Apple has made it easy to allow users to bind their macs to a windows domain with relative ease. The following video show how to bind OSX Mavericks to …

810 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question