• Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 439
  • Last Modified:

Fastest way to update with aggregates in PLSQL

I have two tables:
Product_table
      Product_ID
      AVG_Cost

Transaction_Table
      Product_ID
      Item_Cost
      Condition_ID


I wish to update the AVG_COST in the Product_table(2100 records) with the
Average Item_Cost from the TransactionTable (4 million records)  where the Condition_ID is not 47 or 61

What is the best way to handle this in PLSQL?
0
GNOVAK
Asked:
GNOVAK
  • 2
  • 2
1 Solution
 
sdstuberCommented:
I assume you wanted the average cost per product not simply the average cost of all products.

fastest way is to NOT use pl/sql.  Just one sql statement


UPDATE product_table p
   SET avg_cost =
           (SELECT AVG(item_cost)
              FROM transaction_table t
             WHERE p.product_id = t.product_id AND t.condition_id NOT IN (47, 61))


if by chance you did want to assign a global average to every product, simply remove this portion of the subquery

"p.product_id = t.product_id AND"
0
 
GNOVAKAuthor Commented:
Thanks.
That's what I had thought - it had gotten up to 16 minutes and I thought there was something wrong, so I'm running again. I have indexed on product_Id. I would hate to see how long it takes without that index!

When I try to hardcode the product_id into the statement it takes 444msec.  That made me wonder.  Do you think it might be faster to loop through a cursor, grab the product_id and do an execute immediate for each concontenated product_id?

These updates are excruitiating...
0
 
sdstuberCommented:
>>> Do you think it might be faster to loop through a cursor, grab the product_id and do an execute immediate for each concontenated product_id?


No, definitely not.

The only way you might get better wall-clock time is if you split the list of products into pieces and did them in parallel.  Of course, doing this then creates contention on reads and writes, so no guarantee.

Something like this...

UPDATE product_table p
   SET avg_cost =
           (SELECT AVG(item_cost)
              FROM transaction_table t
             WHERE p.product_id = t.product_id AND t.condition_id NOT IN (47, 61))
where product_id between 1 and 100;

UPDATE product_table p
   SET avg_cost =
           (SELECT AVG(item_cost)
              FROM transaction_table t
             WHERE p.product_id = t.product_id AND t.condition_id NOT IN (47, 61))
where product_id between 101 and 200;

UPDATE product_table p
   SET avg_cost =
           (SELECT AVG(item_cost)
              FROM transaction_table t
             WHERE p.product_id = t.product_id AND t.condition_id NOT IN (47, 61))
where product_id between 201 and 300;

etc.  Each of them running in their own session





In any case, writing your own loop which then forces a parse per row is definitely NOT going to be faster.
0
 
GNOVAKAuthor Commented:
Bummer.... Well it's a good time to catch up on my reading...thanks again!
0
 
SurranoSystem EngineerCommented:
Not sure but this inner aggregate query on a 4M table repeated 2100 times gives me the creeps. I'd do something like this:

create table avg_helper as
select product_id pid, avg(item_cost) a from transaction_table t 
where t.condition_id not in (47,61)
group by product_id;

create index avg_helper_pid on avg_helper (pid);

update product_table p set avg_cost = (select a from avg_helper h where p.product_id=h.pid);

drop table avg_helper;

Open in new window

0

Featured Post

Technology Partners: We Want Your Opinion!

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

  • 2
  • 2
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now