Solved

Clarification in Unicast or Multicast usage in VMware environment ?

Posted on 2014-01-23
9
612 Views
Last Modified: 2014-02-05
Folks, can anyone here please share the best case scenario of using Unicast and Multicast on Windows NLB implementation on VMware ESXi server ?

As far as I understand, the Unicast NLB is supposed to be used by web server who needs to be on both nodes to be Active / Active, and it doesn’t matter when the reply comes from the different server since the content is the same and no user session is persisted.

Unicast
To be used with Non Persistent Windows Terminal Server, when the user connect to the Cluster Virtual IP, it will then randomly selects the available node or Server A in this case, once they disconnect and then reconnect again, different server might serve them (Server B).

Multicast or IGMP Multicast
To be used with persistent connection server while still maintaining High Availability, for example Exchange Server 2007 Client Access Server. Because when the user connects to the CAS server through Active Sync protocol, in this case Server A, it needs to maintain the session and the connection until the user is logged off of the session is closed gracefully, the user will always be connected to the Server A no matter what. In the case of Server A outage, the other server in the node in this case Server B can quickly take over the service until it is drain-stopped and Server A back to the operational state.

Is that analogy correct or needs some clarification?
0
Comment
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 4
  • 4
9 Comments
 
LVL 1

Assisted Solution

by:Jose Ramirez
Jose Ramirez earned 125 total points
ID: 39805604
Hi!

VMware's KB has an excellent article that describes Multicast and Unicast operations modes of Microsoft NLB, including sample configurations of both modes:

http://kb.vmware.com/kb/1006580
0
 
LVL 7

Author Comment

by:Senior IT System Engineer
ID: 39805648
ok, so what happens in this case when I configure the Unicast NLB Terminal Server with single vNIC Multicast IGMP NLB cluster ?

will that still be working without having to put additional steps as per this article: http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US&cmd=displayKC&externalId=1556
0
 
LVL 120
ID: 39805806
Multicast has alwatys been recommended for VMware vSphere.
0
Independent Software Vendors: We Want Your Opinion

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

 
LVL 7

Author Comment

by:Senior IT System Engineer
ID: 39806352
Is that for all of the highly available server type ?
0
 
LVL 120

Assisted Solution

by:Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert / EE MVE^2)
Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert / EE MVE^2) earned 375 total points
ID: 39806383
Correct, if you want to use Microsoft NLB, Multicast has always been recommended.
0
 
LVL 7

Author Comment

by:Senior IT System Engineer
ID: 39806411
Andrew,

I just found out that the existing terminal server in my company is set with 2x vNIC runs as Unicast NLB, shall I remove one of the vNIC and configure it as my Exchange Server Hub Transport server IGMP multicast or just normal multicast ?
0
 
LVL 120

Assisted Solution

by:Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert / EE MVE^2)
Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert / EE MVE^2) earned 375 total points
ID: 39806456
I would recommend Multicast, but also be prepared to alter switch configuration, and add static arp entries to get NLB working, which can be tricky!
0
 
LVL 7

Author Comment

by:Senior IT System Engineer
ID: 39806479
Do you mean the Cisco switch where the ESXi host uplinks connect ?
0
 
LVL 120

Accepted Solution

by:
Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert / EE MVE^2) earned 375 total points
ID: 39806491
That's correct, AND ALL other switches, and up links that connect to your Cisco switches!
0

Featured Post

Simplifying Server Workload Migrations

This use case outlines the migration challenges that organizations face and how the Acronis AnyData Engine supports physical-to-physical (P2P), physical-to-virtual (P2V), virtual to physical (V2P), and cross-virtual (V2V) migration scenarios to address these challenges.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

Lotus Notes – formerly IBM Notes – is an email client application, while IBM Domino (earlier Lotus Domino) is an email server. The client possesses a set of features that are even more advanced as compared to that of Outlook. Likewise, IBM Domino is…
Giving access to ESXi shell console is always an issue for IT departments to other Teams, or Projects. We need to find a way so that teams can use ESXTOP for their POCs, or tests without giving them the access to ESXi host shell console with a root …
This video shows you how to use a vSphere client to connect to your ESX host as the root user. Demonstrates the basic connection of bypassing certification set up. Demonstrates how to access the traditional view to begin managing your virtual mac…
How to Install VMware Tools in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.4 (RHEL 6.4) Step-by-Step Tutorial

735 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question