Solved

cisco 2960s with flexstack

Posted on 2014-01-24
9
560 Views
Last Modified: 2014-04-08
I have 3 2960s with flexstack features.  Can I connect those switches to the core like my diagram (see attached)?
Is there any config sample on how to configure the master and slave?

Thanks
Capture.JPG
0
Comment
Question by:leblanc
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 4
  • 4
9 Comments
 
LVL 11

Assisted Solution

by:Miftaul
Miftaul earned 400 total points
ID: 39808216
Are you stacking them or simply connecting them together.
With your diagram, stp is blocking some ports. You could make different core switch root for different VLAN.

Doing a "Show Switch" on any of the stacked switches will tell the current master.
Here is the Cisco documentation on 2960-S FlexStack - Link
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:leblanc
ID: 39808235
I want to stack them. From my understanding, with the flexstack, those 3 switches will act like one. Correct?
0
 
LVL 11

Assisted Solution

by:Miftaul
Miftaul earned 400 total points
ID: 39808238
Yes, flexstack will make them act like one stacked switch fabric.
0
Free learning courses: Active Directory Deep Dive

Get a firm grasp on your IT environment when you learn Active Directory best practices with Veeam! Watch all, or choose any amount, of this three-part webinar series to improve your skills. From the basics to virtualization and backup, we got you covered.

 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:leblanc
ID: 39808242
I am running hsrp on those core1 and core2. Then my connection for switch0 to core1 and switch3 to core2 shoudl work. Correct? Or does it have to be switch0 to core1 and switch0 to core2? Thanks
0
 
LVL 11

Assisted Solution

by:Miftaul
Miftaul earned 400 total points
ID: 39808249
As long as its flexstacked, it is a single stacked switch. For HSRP, you still need to connect from the Master Switch0.
FlexStack is not a switch cluster.
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:leblanc
ID: 39808255
So let say the master is switch0, so I have to connect switch0 to core1 and switch0 to core2. Correct?

What's the difference between flexstack and switch cluster?
0
 
LVL 11

Assisted Solution

by:Miftaul
Miftaul earned 400 total points
ID: 39808267
Yes exactly, you still need to connect to Switch0.

Here is the Cisco document on Stacking Vs Clustering - Link
0
 
LVL 46

Accepted Solution

by:
Craig Beck earned 100 total points
ID: 39808970
It doesn't matter which switch connects to the core switches if you stack the 2960s.

If you wanted to you could even use MEC to connect multiple links from multiple physical switches to each core.

So for example, you could create a PortChannel on switch 2 and core 1 and connect them together, then create a PortChannel on switch 3 and core 2 and connect them together.  It would work fine.  The master doesn't have to be used.

Cisco have a FlexStack stacking design guide which details best practices for connecting stacked switches.  This guide actually mentions NOT using the stack master to terminate uplinks if possible, especially in 3 or 4-switch stacks to minimize traffic disruption in the event of a stack-master failure.

Also, if you use two uplinks in a 4-switch stack, don't connect them to directly-connected switches, such as switch 1 and 2.  You should instead use switch [2 and 4], or [1 and 3], but not [1 and 2], or [2 and 3], or [3 and 4], or [4 and 1].  You don't have to do this, but it should make most efficient use of stack-bandwidth if you do.

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps6406/white_paper_c11-578928.html

Specifically the "Recommended Deployment Strategies for Building FlexStack" section.
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:leblanc
ID: 39809378
Thank you very much for your inputs. It is certainly very helpful. I will look at the white papers in more details.
0

Featured Post

Secure Your WordPress Site: 5 Essential Approaches

WordPress is the web's most popular CMS, but its dominance also makes it a target for attackers. Our eBook will show you how to:

Prevent costly exploits of core and plugin vulnerabilities
Repel automated attacks
Lock down your dashboard, secure your code, and protect your users

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

ADCs have gained traction within the last decade, largely due to increased demand for legacy load balancing appliances to handle more advanced application delivery requirements and improve application performance.
Most of the applications these days are on Cloud. Cloud is ubiquitous with many service providers in the market. Since it has many benefits such as cost reduction, software updates, remote access, disaster recovery and much more.
NetCrunch network monitor is a highly extensive platform for network monitoring and alert generation. In this video you'll see a live demo of NetCrunch with most notable features explained in a walk-through manner. You'll also get to know the philos…
Monitoring a network: why having a policy is the best policy? Michael Kulchisky, MCSE, MCSA, MCP, VTSP, VSP, CCSP outlines the enormous benefits of having a policy-based approach when monitoring medium and large networks. Software utilized in this v…

695 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question