ksd123
asked on
Migrating from IIS6 to IIS7
Hi Experts,
We have a legacy .Net Application (Asp.net 2.0,.Net Framework 2.0,VS 2005) hosted on IIS6 (windows server 2003) working fine without any issue.Now we want to migrate the application to IIS7 (windows server 2008).I am getting error at Global.asax when I select application pool pipeline mode as "integrated " in IIS7 and this error r is due to a design change in the IIS7 Integrated pipeline .I resolved this error just by changing app pool pipeline mode to "classic" and working fine.
I googled on this issue some recommend "classic" without changing any code and others recommend "Integrate" mode and for this I need to change the code at Global.asax file.
Can anyone guide me which approach should I opt and what are the implications of using one over the other? (classic vs integrated)
Thanks in Advance
We have a legacy .Net Application (Asp.net 2.0,.Net Framework 2.0,VS 2005) hosted on IIS6 (windows server 2003) working fine without any issue.Now we want to migrate the application to IIS7 (windows server 2008).I am getting error at Global.asax when I select application pool pipeline mode as "integrated " in IIS7 and this error r is due to a design change in the IIS7 Integrated pipeline .I resolved this error just by changing app pool pipeline mode to "classic" and working fine.
I googled on this issue some recommend "classic" without changing any code and others recommend "Integrate" mode and for this I need to change the code at Global.asax file.
Can anyone guide me which approach should I opt and what are the implications of using one over the other? (classic vs integrated)
Thanks in Advance
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Then, ask yourself why you are going to IIS7? I always like to run in Integrated Mode, so I would investigate what you are using in the Global.asax, that requires IIS 6 worker-process isolation mode (Classic), and see if there is a different approach.
ASKER
Thanks for the explanation