Go Premium for a chance to win a PS4. Enter to Win

x
  • Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 306
  • Last Modified:

Calculating a rate over time

I am trying to calculate a rate over time.  I have two distinct tables in my database and need quantities from both tables.  Here is what I have so far which is not working:

SELECT ROUND(my_count/cumulative_amount*1000000,2) FROM
(SELECT SUM(val1) as my_count, fiscalMonth from tableA where flag=1 and fiscal_year=2013
 group by fiscalMonth
order by fiscalMonth),
(SELECT SUM(SUM(amount)) OVER
  (ORDER BY fiscalMonth ROWS BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND CURRENT ROW) AS
   cumulative_amount from tableB where fiscalYear = 2013 
group by fiscalmonth,
order by fiscalmonth)

Open in new window


Each of the queries running against Table A and Table B give the correct result.  How do I do the calculation?
Thanks and I hope this makes sense.
0
Breadbaker
Asked:
Breadbaker
2 Solutions
 
sdstuberCommented:
please post sample data and expected results
0
 
BreadbakerAuthor Commented:
VALUE      CUMULATIVE VALUE2  RESULT
OCT      3452212      3452212             2         0.579338696
NOV      3556722      7008934             1         0.142675049
DEC      4328764      11337698             4         0.352805305
JAN      3676622      15014320             5         0.333015415
FEB      5003345      20017665             0         0
MAR      3452299      23469964             0         0
APR      4578234      28048198             5         0.178264572
MAY      5366325      33414523             7         0.209489748
JUN      3487690      36902213             1         0.027098646
JUL      3276843      40179056             2         0.049777177
AUG      4226612      44405668             6         0.135117886
SEP      3962247      48367915             5         0.103374313

RESULT is value2/cumulative*1000000 and that's the value I want to retrieve.  I can get the cumulactive and the value2  Hope this helps and thank you!
0
 
sdstuberCommented:
no, I'm sorry, it doesn't.


you have 2 tables in your query, but I only see one table's data

If that sample data is supposed to represent your current query, it doesn't make sense because your current query would only return one column

I don't understand what the sample data is supposed to represent

also, if you can generate the value2 and cumulative columns, and you know how to calculate the results.

I'm not sure what you're asking.
0
Technology Partners: We Want Your Opinion!

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

 
BreadbakerAuthor Commented:
I want to generate a rate for each month as defined by count "divided by" cumulative rate for that month*1000000.  I can do one query to get the cumulative rate and another to get the count.  Each value is in a different table and there is no key/foreign key.

I was just wondering if one query could retrieve both values and do the calculation as well.  I can just use 2 queries and do the calculation in my coldfusion.  

My data table above is skewed a bit, sorry about that.

VALUE      CUMUL      VALUE2      RESULT
3452212      3452212      2      0.579338696   Result for each row is value2/CUMUL*1000000
3556722      7008934      1      0.142675049
4328764      11337698      4      0.352805305
3676622      15014320      5      0.333015415
5003345      20017665      0      0
3452299      23469964      0      0
4578234      28048198      5      0.178264572
5366325      33414523      7      0.209489748
3487690      36902213      1      0.027098646
3276843      40179056      2      0.049777177
4226612      44405668      6      0.135117886
3962247      48367915      5      0.103374313
0
 
sdstuberCommented:
Your sample data still doesn't correspond to anything you've posted.
It is neither table data nor the result of a query you have posted.


or, if it does correspond to your previous query, please explain how.

where do value and value2 come from?


I'm assuming your "sample data" is really the "expected results"
but you haven't show the corresponding Input data that should produce that output.
0
 
slightwv (䄆 Netminder) Commented:
Breadbaker,

What sdstuber (and the other Experts) are looking for is the actual data for the two tables and then the expected results.

For example:  From the original select you posted, you have:
tableA
--------
val1
fiscalMonth 
flag
fiscal_year

tableB
--------
amount
fiscalMonth 
fiscalmonth
fiscalYear
                                  

Open in new window


Please provide sample data for BOTH tables, then based on that data, provide what you expect the results to be.
0
 
PortletPaulCommented:
there is a syntax error at line 8 of the original query (a trailing comma)
- so it would appear we are only seeing part of the full query
- & you should avoid using "order by" in those subqueries

The overall logic of that original query seems to be that you intend to join "tablea" to "tableb" via the field fiscalmonth, which is OK if the data is for only one fiscal year but then you are not actually specifying this relationship so you are probably getting a Cartesian product instead of the intended join by fiscalmonth to fiscalmonth.

This seems to be what you intend (I think):
SELECT ROUND(a.my_count / b.cumulative_amount * 1000000, 2)
     /* nb there is no protection against divide by zero error */
FROM (
	SELECT SUM(val1) AS my_count
		, fiscalMonth
	FROM tableA
	WHERE flag = 1 AND fiscal_year = 2013
	GROUP BY fiscalMonth
	) A
LEFT JOIN (
	SELECT fiscalMonth
		, SUM(amount) OVER (
			ORDER BY fiscalMonth ROWS BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND CURRENT ROW
			) AS cumulative_amount
	FROM tableB
	WHERE fiscalYear = 2013
	GROUP BY fiscalmonth
	) b ON a.fiscalMonth = b.fiscalMonth

Open in new window

The comments above about sample data are quite correct. The small query result you have provided does not aid us as it does not fit into tablea or tableb and hence we cannot trial a query using those tables.
0
 
awking00Commented:
Can you just provide the results of the two following queries?

select fiscalmonth, val1 from tablea
where flag = 1 and fiscalyear = 2013;

select fiscalmonth, amount from tableb
where fiscalyear = 2013;
0
 
BreadbakerAuthor Commented:
Here is some sample data:
Table A
fiscal month      val1
1                     0
2                     0
3                     0
4                     0
5                     2
6                     1
7                     2
8                     3
9                     2
10                     0
11                     1
12                     2

Table B
fiscal month          amount                        
1                            4231112
2                   4366112
3                   4434465
4                   6542223
5                   3311222
6                   4332211
7                   4982311
8                   3422189
9                   3321114
10                   6200114
11                   3224568
12                   4216895

Result I want:
fiscal month          rate
1                 0
2                 0
3                 0
4                 0
5                 0.2
6                0.13
7                0.21
8               0.36
9               0.3
10               0
11               0.11
12              0.27

Rate calculated by dividing val1 by cumulative sum of the amount per month.  PortletPaul has very close to what I think I need and I am attempting to construct the query like that, I am just unfamiliar with the syntax for something like this.  Thank you.
0
 
sdstuberCommented:
your values don't seem to correspond to your description

5                 0.2

but your description says 0.2 would be calculated as

2 / (4231112 + 4366112 + 4434465 + 6542223 + 3311222)

which equals 0.0000000873929774673812266076309625279013004687

How are you getting 0.2  ?
0
 
BreadbakerAuthor Commented:
Sorry, you are correct.  That is what I want to do.  So the correct values for the accumulative values would be:
4231112
8597224
13031689
19573912
22885134
27217345
32199656
35621845
38942959
45143073
48367641
52584536

and the rates would be:
0
0
0
0
0.09  
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.05
0
0.02
0.04
0
 
sdstuberCommented:
thank you, given the 2 tables and the correct expected results, it's possible to build a test case and write the query.

This produces the requested rates in http:#a39818113 for the data given in http:#a39816177 

SELECT a.fiscalmonth, ROUND(a.val1 / SUM(b.amount) OVER (ORDER BY a.fiscalmonth) * 1000000, 2) rate
  FROM tablea a, tableb b
 WHERE a.fiscalmonth = b.fiscalmonth

Open in new window



I didn't need the cumulative results, the query generates those on its own.
Also, your last description didn't say anything about multiplying results by a million, but based on the values and previous posts I guessed you still wanted to do that
0

Featured Post

Fill in the form and get your FREE NFR key NOW!

Veeam is happy to provide a FREE NFR server license to certified engineers, trainers, and bloggers.  It allows for the non‑production use of Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows. This license is valid for five workstations and two servers.

Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now