Solved

VPN Solutions for this decade

Posted on 2014-01-29
3
213 Views
Last Modified: 2014-02-04
Hello-- General question regarding VPN services.

My company uses Sonicwall Netextender for our VPN needs.
This system-- while functional, is limited and a tad dated (implemented 2009)

As for limitations, there are only a few seats that can be had simultaneously from our Netextender service. When multiple people log on, the connection bogs to a trickle. recently, the hardware keeps restarting itself periodically.

When implemented, we were on a 2003 environment, but since, we have since updated to a 2008 environment. I'm not sure if this system was implemented to run under the older systems' 32-bit limitations.

Obviously, I could stick with Sonicwall, upgrade the hardware and subscribe to a more modern service from them, however, I'm curious to what other people are using, and how satisfied they are with their VPN solutions.

Thank you in advance.
0
Comment
Question by:Cashpanda
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
3 Comments
 
LVL 12

Assisted Solution

by:Infamus
Infamus earned 166 total points
ID: 39818910
You can take a look at the datasheet for Fortinet or Cisco 5500 series.

What model is your sonicwall now?
0
 
LVL 70

Assisted Solution

by:Qlemo
Qlemo earned 167 total points
ID: 39818918
Whatever device you use, you need to plan enough resources in reserve for future demands. And, most important, have firmware updates. All firmware is buggy. Your issues sound a lot like "known features with old firmware" ;-).
Most users having implemented SonicWalls are satisfied with speed and stability, so what you experience is uncommon.

In general, if you have one kind of firewall device, stay with that brand. Most of the time it is not worth it having to fiddle with a new GUI or (worse) CLI.
Having said that, the brands you usually hear alot about are SonicWall, Cisco (enterprise class, not the Linksys branch), CheckPoint, Juniper SSG, Fortinet (certainly I've omitted one or three). We use Juniper SSG by strong conviction :D
0
 
LVL 20

Accepted Solution

by:
carlmd earned 167 total points
ID: 39820367
I would stick with Sonicwall. If your current device is 5 years old chances are it is way underpowered for your current needs. Sonicwall has an upgrade program that could save you a little money, should you decide to go that way.
0

Featured Post

Are your AD admin tools letting you down?

Managing Active Directory can get complicated.  Often, the native tools for managing AD are just not up to the task.  The largest Active Directory installations in the world have relied on one tool to manage their day-to-day administration tasks: Hyena. Start your trial today.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

I was prompted to write this article after the recent World-Wide Ransomware outbreak. For years now, System Administrators around the world have used the excuse of "Waiting a Bit" before applying Security Patch Updates. This type of reasoning to me …
After seeing many questions for JRNL_WRAP_ERROR for replication failure, I thought it would be useful to write this article.
This tutorial will give a short introduction and overview of Backup Exec 2012 and how to navigate and perform basic functions. Click on the Backup Exec button in the upper left corner. From here, are global settings for the application such as conne…
After creating this article (http://www.experts-exchange.com/articles/23699/Setup-Mikrotik-routers-with-OSPF.html), I decided to make a video (no audio) to show you how to configure the routers and run some trace routes and pings between the 7 sites…
Suggested Courses

626 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question