Solved

VPN Solutions for this decade

Posted on 2014-01-29
3
211 Views
Last Modified: 2014-02-04
Hello-- General question regarding VPN services.

My company uses Sonicwall Netextender for our VPN needs.
This system-- while functional, is limited and a tad dated (implemented 2009)

As for limitations, there are only a few seats that can be had simultaneously from our Netextender service. When multiple people log on, the connection bogs to a trickle. recently, the hardware keeps restarting itself periodically.

When implemented, we were on a 2003 environment, but since, we have since updated to a 2008 environment. I'm not sure if this system was implemented to run under the older systems' 32-bit limitations.

Obviously, I could stick with Sonicwall, upgrade the hardware and subscribe to a more modern service from them, however, I'm curious to what other people are using, and how satisfied they are with their VPN solutions.

Thank you in advance.
0
Comment
Question by:Cashpanda
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
3 Comments
 
LVL 12

Assisted Solution

by:Infamus
Infamus earned 166 total points
ID: 39818910
You can take a look at the datasheet for Fortinet or Cisco 5500 series.

What model is your sonicwall now?
0
 
LVL 70

Assisted Solution

by:Qlemo
Qlemo earned 167 total points
ID: 39818918
Whatever device you use, you need to plan enough resources in reserve for future demands. And, most important, have firmware updates. All firmware is buggy. Your issues sound a lot like "known features with old firmware" ;-).
Most users having implemented SonicWalls are satisfied with speed and stability, so what you experience is uncommon.

In general, if you have one kind of firewall device, stay with that brand. Most of the time it is not worth it having to fiddle with a new GUI or (worse) CLI.
Having said that, the brands you usually hear alot about are SonicWall, Cisco (enterprise class, not the Linksys branch), CheckPoint, Juniper SSG, Fortinet (certainly I've omitted one or three). We use Juniper SSG by strong conviction :D
0
 
LVL 20

Accepted Solution

by:
carlmd earned 167 total points
ID: 39820367
I would stick with Sonicwall. If your current device is 5 years old chances are it is way underpowered for your current needs. Sonicwall has an upgrade program that could save you a little money, should you decide to go that way.
0

Featured Post

Business Impact of IT Communications

What are the business impacts of how well businesses communicate during an IT incident? Targeting, speed, and transparency all matter. Find out more in this infographic.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

Title # Comments Views Activity
Resource timeout across a VPN 9 70
Advice on router and switch 25 88
Copy user profile 6 36
SSL VPN and open two factor authentication 3 83
Possible fixes for Windows 7 and Windows Server 2008 updating problem. Solutions mentioned are from Microsoft themselves. I started a case with them from our Microsoft Silver Partner option to open a case and get direct support from Microsoft. If s…
A safe way to clean winsxs folder from your windows server 2008 R2 editions
To efficiently enable the rotation of USB drives for backups, storage pools need to be created. This way no matter which USB drive is installed, the backups will successfully write without any administrative intervention. Multiple USB devices need t…
After creating this article (http://www.experts-exchange.com/articles/23699/Setup-Mikrotik-routers-with-OSPF.html), I decided to make a video (no audio) to show you how to configure the routers and run some trace routes and pings between the 7 sites…

710 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question