Go Premium for a chance to win a PS4. Enter to Win

x
?
Solved

Monitoring performance of a Vmware physical mode RDM Perfmon

Posted on 2014-01-31
7
Medium Priority
?
1,311 Views
Last Modified: 2014-02-04
We have an ESSbase server that is running within our Vmware virtual environment. Lately there have been some performance issues, the vendor seems to think that it could be tied to the storage on which the data lives.

From within windows on the guest OS running perfmon during slow performance we noticed that the counter for Disk Transfers/sec was averaging about 40 and sometimes as high as 200. From everything Ive seen online this points to a disk bottleneck.

This server has an RDM attached which is comprised of 4 15k sas drives in a RAID 10 configuration from our EMC VNX SAN so it should be performing better than this.

Im just looking for some advice on what I can monitor through vmware or windows that might provide some insight into the slowness.

Any help is appreciated.
0
Comment
Question by:Joseph Daly
  • 4
  • 3
7 Comments
 
LVL 124
ID: 39824363
If you have an RDM, it's passed through RAW to the VM.

So you will need to look at performance metrics within the VM.

4 x 15K SAS drives, in RAID 10, if you want more IOPS, you'll need to add more VMs.

Is it read or write, which is causing the issues?

How many IOPS do you require?
0
 
LVL 35

Author Comment

by:Joseph Daly
ID: 39824575
"4 x 15K SAS drives, in RAID 10, if you want more IOPS, you'll need to add more VMs."

 Im guessing you meant disks here. That is something we are currently looking into but would take time.

"Is it read or write, which is causing the issues?"
I waiting on the DBA to be available to run tests to determine.

So would you reccomend monitoring this using perfmon tools or the performance metrics in Vcenter.
0
 
LVL 124

Accepted Solution

by:
Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert / EE MVE^2) earned 2000 total points
ID: 39824738
As this is a physical implementation, e.g. disk/drive is presented to the VM direct, you will need to look a VM statistics (perfmon).

But as an aside...

do you have a VMFS datastore, using more disks?

Checkout this:-

RDM versus VMDK performance

Conclusion: VMFS and RDM have similar performance. Don’t choose RDM for performance.
Source:http://www.vfrank.org/2011/03/22/performance-rdm-vs-vmfs/
0
Concerto's Cloud Advisory Services

Want to avoid the missteps to gaining all the benefits of the cloud? Learn more about the different assessment options from our Cloud Advisory team.

 
LVL 35

Author Comment

by:Joseph Daly
ID: 39826502
I ran crystal diskmark against the drive in question that was having the poor performance. It looks like my 4k read and writes are terrible.

diskmark
0
 
LVL 124
ID: 39826511
What is the latency?

The way to increase this is too add more spindles to the RAID 10 set.

Is the database running slowly?

It's not a poor database or application, with no indexes, a poor designed database will always be a poor slow VM.

Can you move the VM to a local disks and test?
0
 
LVL 35

Author Comment

by:Joseph Daly
ID: 39826555
This is a Hyperion installation each update is taking approx A minute and a half to respond and be committed

Moving to a Nother DataStor on the VM might be a possibility but I won't be able to do that until I talk to the team responsible for managing this system

Adding more disks to that raid group is our last option since it will require a purchase of additional disk
0
 
LVL 124
ID: 39826571
Not to fast, we've been testing a new product from PernixData.

http://www.pernixdata.com/

If you've never heard of them, they are going to take the Storage/VMware world over!

We no longer need to add any more disks to our SANs to increase latency and IOPS!

Simple idea, an SSD/PCI-e flash card in the host, (not in the SAN) so closer to the CPU reduces even more latency, read and writes are cached in the SSD, and trickled back to the storage.

ALL storage is supported. No need to add more disks to your LUN/SAN!

It's BRILLIANT, highly recommended!

and you can select which VMs benefit, and therefore size your cache accordingly.

It's better than ALL the other versions!

oh, and the two co-founders are two guys which left VMware, the guy which designed the VMFS storage system, and another member from the Storage Team.

So there know a little about VMFS Storage!

Before adding more disks, I would look at this solution above, we've always been told by SAN vendors, add more spindles, add more spindles to increase IOPS and Latency, or purchase SSDs, or purchase Flash Cache Head.....

now it's changed.....enter PernixData.

PS I do not work for PernixData, I've just used and tested the product!

It's Excellent!
0

Featured Post

Industry Leaders: We Want Your Opinion!

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Background Information Recently I have fixed file server permission issues for one of my client. The client has 1800 users and one Windows Server 2008 R2 domain joined file server with 12 TB of data, 250+ shared folders and the folder structure i…
A look into Log Analysis and Effective Critical Alerting.
To efficiently enable the rotation of USB drives for backups, storage pools need to be created. This way no matter which USB drive is installed, the backups will successfully write without any administrative intervention. Multiple USB devices need t…
In this video tutorial I show you the main steps to install and configure  a VMware ESXi6.0 server. The video has my comments as text on the screen and you can pause anytime when needed. Hope this will be helpful. Verify that your hardware and BIO…

877 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question