Still celebrating National IT Professionals Day with 3 months of free Premium Membership. Use Code ITDAY17

x
?
Solved

Universal Groups Exchange 2010

Posted on 2014-02-06
2
Medium Priority
?
322 Views
Last Modified: 2014-02-06
Hi experts,

I asked a similar question before, but I`d like to be sure before I do a fault.

In the past we created global security groups in our active directory which are used for NTFS-privileges on our network.

In Exchange2010 those groups are now shown as "Non-Universal E-Mail groups".

I need to convert some of them because of auto-responding functionality. Will the conversion break any NTFS-function?

Otherwise I would convert those groups.
We have a single domain and forest...


Best regards
Roland
0
Comment
Question by:Systemadministration
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
2 Comments
 
LVL 53

Accepted Solution

by:
Will Szymkowski earned 2000 total points
ID: 39839069
You will not lose any NTFS functionality. I have talked about Mail Enabled Security Groups in the past and personally i do not like them. Although you can use them and they work perfectly fine, sometimes people get confused when you have a mix of Distribution and Mail Enabled Security Groups.

Example.
If you have a department "Accounting" with a mail enabled security group, and for whatever reason (projects normally) you would add someone from another department to this group so that they can get project updates, so you add someone from Marketing Department.

You have now done 2 things.
1. You have provided access to that user in the Martketing Department so they they can receive projects updates because they are part of the Accounting Mail Enabled Security Group.

2. You have also provided this user from the marketing department access to Shares or Directories that only Accounting should have access to. This now becomes a security concern because the user from Marketing may not know they have access to files or directories but if they stumble accross an Accounting direcotry they may see information which is probably confidential. I have seen this a lot and Security Audits will always fail if there was not a Change process in place and reasoning for this user to have access to these directories.

That being said everything will work fine. I just wanted to provide my opinion and experience when dealing with a mixture of distribution and mail enabled security groups.

Will.
0
 

Author Closing Comment

by:Systemadministration
ID: 39839098
Thanks!
Great Answer
0

Featured Post

Free Tool: Subnet Calculator

The subnet calculator helps you design networks by taking an IP address and network mask and returning information such as network, broadcast address, and host range.

One of a set of tools we're offering as a way of saying thank you for being a part of the community.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

This process allows computer passwords to be managed and secured without using LAPS. This is an improvement on an existing process, enhanced to store password encrypted, instead of clear-text files within SQL
Let's recap what we learned from yesterday's Skyport Systems webinar.
This tutorial will walk an individual through the process of transferring the five major, necessary Active Directory Roles, commonly referred to as the FSMO roles to another domain controller. Log onto the new domain controller with a user account t…
This tutorial will walk an individual through the process of configuring their Windows Server 2012 domain controller to synchronize its time with a trusted, external resource. Use Google, Bing, or other preferred search engine to locate trusted NTP …
Suggested Courses

705 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question