Go Premium for a chance to win a PS4. Enter to Win

x
?
Solved

single storage VM's risks

Posted on 2014-02-09
4
Medium Priority
?
251 Views
Last Modified: 2014-02-12
could anyone give an overview of the risks associated with storing VM's on single/local storage as opposed to shared SAN storage? Please keep answers management freindly tech free if at all possible. and/or the ebenfits on ensuring all VM's are on shared/SAN storage.
0
Comment
Question by:pma111
4 Comments
 
LVL 15

Accepted Solution

by:
cwstad2 earned 500 total points
ID: 39845821
If all VM's are stored on single storage if you have an outage then you will lose all VM's until fixed or restored. We run some on a stand alone server, with raid 1 for Hypervisor and Raid 5 for VMS. Backed up to a NAS device. On our main site SAN
0
 
LVL 124

Assisted Solution

by:Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert / EE MVE^2)
Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert / EE MVE^2) earned 500 total points
ID: 39845826
Local Storage is a Single Point of Failure.

If you VMs are stored on local storage, only those VMs, can he Hosted on a single Host.
0
 
LVL 6

Assisted Solution

by:Jelcin
Jelcin earned 500 total points
ID: 39845875
Given the fact that you mean a single shared SAN storage without high availability. And by local storage you mean just a RAID controller local storage.

Cons and Pros of local storage:

1. It is much cheaper.
2. it is much more easier to set up.
3. You cannot have several machines accessing the storage (with shared SAN storage you can have several hosts accessing the storage and migrating VMs from one machine to another or just having the VM's spread over the two or more hosts for computing capacity and availability options.
4. Given the fact that you have a good Backup strategy it is as secure as having a shared SAN storage because the storage (without high availability) is the SPOF (single point of failure).
5. Separating the storage (Shared SAN) from the computing host gives you way more flexibility.
0
 
LVL 28

Assisted Solution

by:asavener
asavener earned 500 total points
ID: 39846315
It's not additional risk; it's loss of features.  You can't have a high availability cluster using local storage.


RAID can be configured on local storage the same way you configure RAID on shared storage;  RAID 6 with a global spare is just the same on local storage as it is on a SAN.
0

Featured Post

Get free NFR key for Veeam Availability Suite 9.5

Veeam is happy to provide a free NFR license (1 year, 2 sockets) to all certified IT Pros. The license allows for the non-production use of Veeam Availability Suite v9.5 in your home lab, without any feature limitations. It works for both VMware and Hyper-V environments

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

If your vDisk VHD file gets deleted from the image store accidentally or on purpose, you won't be able to remove the vDisk from the PVS console. There is a known workaround that is solid.
A look into Log Analysis and Effective Critical Alerting.
Teach the user how to use create log bundles for vCenter Server or ESXi hosts Open vSphere Web Client: Generate vCenter Server and ESXi host log bundle:  Open vCenter Server Appliance Web Management interface and generate log bundle: Open vCenter Se…
This Micro Tutorial walks you through using a remote console to access a server and install ESXi 5.1. This example is showing remote access and installation using a Dell server. The hypervisor is the very first component of your virtual infrastructu…

927 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question