Solved

single storage VM's risks

Posted on 2014-02-09
4
247 Views
Last Modified: 2014-02-12
could anyone give an overview of the risks associated with storing VM's on single/local storage as opposed to shared SAN storage? Please keep answers management freindly tech free if at all possible. and/or the ebenfits on ensuring all VM's are on shared/SAN storage.
0
Comment
Question by:pma111
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
4 Comments
 
LVL 15

Accepted Solution

by:
cwstad2 earned 125 total points
ID: 39845821
If all VM's are stored on single storage if you have an outage then you will lose all VM's until fixed or restored. We run some on a stand alone server, with raid 1 for Hypervisor and Raid 5 for VMS. Backed up to a NAS device. On our main site SAN
0
 
LVL 121

Assisted Solution

by:Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert / EE MVE^2)
Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert / EE MVE^2) earned 125 total points
ID: 39845826
Local Storage is a Single Point of Failure.

If you VMs are stored on local storage, only those VMs, can he Hosted on a single Host.
0
 
LVL 6

Assisted Solution

by:Jelcin
Jelcin earned 125 total points
ID: 39845875
Given the fact that you mean a single shared SAN storage without high availability. And by local storage you mean just a RAID controller local storage.

Cons and Pros of local storage:

1. It is much cheaper.
2. it is much more easier to set up.
3. You cannot have several machines accessing the storage (with shared SAN storage you can have several hosts accessing the storage and migrating VMs from one machine to another or just having the VM's spread over the two or more hosts for computing capacity and availability options.
4. Given the fact that you have a good Backup strategy it is as secure as having a shared SAN storage because the storage (without high availability) is the SPOF (single point of failure).
5. Separating the storage (Shared SAN) from the computing host gives you way more flexibility.
0
 
LVL 28

Assisted Solution

by:asavener
asavener earned 125 total points
ID: 39846315
It's not additional risk; it's loss of features.  You can't have a high availability cluster using local storage.


RAID can be configured on local storage the same way you configure RAID on shared storage;  RAID 6 with a global spare is just the same on local storage as it is on a SAN.
0

Featured Post

When ransomware hits your clients, what do you do?

MSPs: Endpoint security isn’t enough to prevent ransomware.
As the impact and severity of crypto ransomware attacks has grown, Webroot fought back, not just by building a next-gen endpoint solution capable of preventing ransomware attacks but also by being a thought leader.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

In this article, I show you step by step with screenshots to assist you - HOW TO: Deploy and Install the VMware vCenter Server Appliance 6.5 (VCSA 6.5), with some helpful tips along the way.
A look into Log Analysis and Effective Critical Alerting.
Teach the user how to convert virtaul disk file formats and how to rename virtual machine files on datastores. Open vSphere Web Client: Review VM disk settings: Migrate VM to new datastore with a thick provisioned (lazy zeroed) disk format: Rename a…
How to Install VMware Tools in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.4 (RHEL 6.4) Step-by-Step Tutorial

734 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question