Solved

single storage VM's risks

Posted on 2014-02-09
4
244 Views
Last Modified: 2014-02-12
could anyone give an overview of the risks associated with storing VM's on single/local storage as opposed to shared SAN storage? Please keep answers management freindly tech free if at all possible. and/or the ebenfits on ensuring all VM's are on shared/SAN storage.
0
Comment
Question by:pma111
4 Comments
 
LVL 15

Accepted Solution

by:
cwstad2 earned 125 total points
ID: 39845821
If all VM's are stored on single storage if you have an outage then you will lose all VM's until fixed or restored. We run some on a stand alone server, with raid 1 for Hypervisor and Raid 5 for VMS. Backed up to a NAS device. On our main site SAN
0
 
LVL 119

Assisted Solution

by:Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert / EE MVE^2)
Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert / EE MVE^2) earned 125 total points
ID: 39845826
Local Storage is a Single Point of Failure.

If you VMs are stored on local storage, only those VMs, can he Hosted on a single Host.
0
 
LVL 6

Assisted Solution

by:Jelcin
Jelcin earned 125 total points
ID: 39845875
Given the fact that you mean a single shared SAN storage without high availability. And by local storage you mean just a RAID controller local storage.

Cons and Pros of local storage:

1. It is much cheaper.
2. it is much more easier to set up.
3. You cannot have several machines accessing the storage (with shared SAN storage you can have several hosts accessing the storage and migrating VMs from one machine to another or just having the VM's spread over the two or more hosts for computing capacity and availability options.
4. Given the fact that you have a good Backup strategy it is as secure as having a shared SAN storage because the storage (without high availability) is the SPOF (single point of failure).
5. Separating the storage (Shared SAN) from the computing host gives you way more flexibility.
0
 
LVL 28

Assisted Solution

by:asavener
asavener earned 125 total points
ID: 39846315
It's not additional risk; it's loss of features.  You can't have a high availability cluster using local storage.


RAID can be configured on local storage the same way you configure RAID on shared storage;  RAID 6 with a global spare is just the same on local storage as it is on a SAN.
0

Featured Post

Netscaler Common Configuration How To guides

If you use NetScaler you will want to see these guides. The NetScaler How To Guides show administrators how to get NetScaler up and configured by providing instructions for common scenarios and some not so common ones.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

HOW TO: Connect to the VMware vSphere Hypervisor 6.5 (ESXi 6.5) using the vSphere (HTML5 Web) Host Client 6.5, and perform a simple configuration task of adding a new VMFS 6 datastore.
In this article, I am going to show you how to simulate a multi-site Lab environment on a single Hyper-V host. I use this method successfully in my own lab to simulate three fully routed global AD Sites on a Windows 10 Hyper-V host.
Teach the user how to use configure the vCenter Server storage filters Open vSphere Web Client:  Navigate to vCenter Server Advanced Settings: Add the four vCenter Server storage filters: Review the advanced settings: Modify the values of the four v…
This video shows you how easy it is to boot from ISO images for virtual machines with the ISO images stored on a local datastore on the ESXi host.

828 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question