Solved

single storage VM's risks

Posted on 2014-02-09
4
245 Views
Last Modified: 2014-02-12
could anyone give an overview of the risks associated with storing VM's on single/local storage as opposed to shared SAN storage? Please keep answers management freindly tech free if at all possible. and/or the ebenfits on ensuring all VM's are on shared/SAN storage.
0
Comment
Question by:pma111
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
4 Comments
 
LVL 15

Accepted Solution

by:
cwstad2 earned 125 total points
ID: 39845821
If all VM's are stored on single storage if you have an outage then you will lose all VM's until fixed or restored. We run some on a stand alone server, with raid 1 for Hypervisor and Raid 5 for VMS. Backed up to a NAS device. On our main site SAN
0
 
LVL 120

Assisted Solution

by:Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert / EE MVE^2)
Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert / EE MVE^2) earned 125 total points
ID: 39845826
Local Storage is a Single Point of Failure.

If you VMs are stored on local storage, only those VMs, can he Hosted on a single Host.
0
 
LVL 6

Assisted Solution

by:Jelcin
Jelcin earned 125 total points
ID: 39845875
Given the fact that you mean a single shared SAN storage without high availability. And by local storage you mean just a RAID controller local storage.

Cons and Pros of local storage:

1. It is much cheaper.
2. it is much more easier to set up.
3. You cannot have several machines accessing the storage (with shared SAN storage you can have several hosts accessing the storage and migrating VMs from one machine to another or just having the VM's spread over the two or more hosts for computing capacity and availability options.
4. Given the fact that you have a good Backup strategy it is as secure as having a shared SAN storage because the storage (without high availability) is the SPOF (single point of failure).
5. Separating the storage (Shared SAN) from the computing host gives you way more flexibility.
0
 
LVL 28

Assisted Solution

by:asavener
asavener earned 125 total points
ID: 39846315
It's not additional risk; it's loss of features.  You can't have a high availability cluster using local storage.


RAID can be configured on local storage the same way you configure RAID on shared storage;  RAID 6 with a global spare is just the same on local storage as it is on a SAN.
0

Featured Post

Free Tool: Subnet Calculator

The subnet calculator helps you design networks by taking an IP address and network mask and returning information such as network, broadcast address, and host range.

One of a set of tools we're offering as a way of saying thank you for being a part of the community.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

In this article, I will show you HOW TO: Suppress Configuration Issues and Warnings Alert displayed in Summary status for ESXi 6.5 after enabling SSH or ESXi Shell.
When rebooting a vCenters 6.0 and try to connect using vSphere Client we get this issue "Invalid URL: The hostname could not parsed." When we get this error we need to do some changes in the vCenter advanced settings to fix the issue.
Teach the user how to edit .vmx files to add advanced configuration options Open vSphere Web Client: Edit Settings for a VM: Choose VM Options -> Advanced: Add Configuration Parameters:
Teach the user how to use create log bundles for vCenter Server or ESXi hosts Open vSphere Web Client: Generate vCenter Server and ESXi host log bundle:  Open vCenter Server Appliance Web Management interface and generate log bundle: Open vCenter Se…

739 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question