Solved

IBM LPM performance issue

Posted on 2014-02-13
4
444 Views
Last Modified: 2014-02-13
I recently had performance issues when I was LPM'ing a DB server from one frame to another, The server had 56GB and took almost an hour, But I have a similar machine with the same metrics and had 10% more load than the previous one which took only 40 min.

Also on the first one which I was LPM'd had application slowness and queries hanging, So does LPM have performance issues because IBM says its not the case...
0
Comment
Question by:aanya247
  • 2
  • 2
4 Comments
 
LVL 68

Accepted Solution

by:
woolmilkporc earned 500 total points
ID: 39857119
If the whole system (not just the LPAR) in question runs near 100% (all CPUs) I can imagine that the small LPM overhead could have an effect on LPAR peformance, but if there's a bit CPU left no one should even notice that LPM is running (but see below).

If you don't have a dedicated connection LPM slowness could be due to network congestion, but from my experience the greatest impact on LPM speed is always by memory activity.

It's not the consumed amount of main memory which counts, it's the change rate.

A big amount of static memory can be transferred just easily, but continuously changing memory content is a challenge for LPM.

The more "dynamic" the memory is the longer LPM will have to try to transfer as much memory as possible, and the longer the whole process will take.

There is a short moment where LPAR processing has to be suspended in order to transfer the remaining memory content (which is too dynamic to be transferred on the fly) and to pass control to the target system.
The higher this amount of memory the longer the suspend time - this can potentially lead to application outages.

wmp
0
 

Author Comment

by:aanya247
ID: 39857437
thank you so much for the explanation, So u know how long is the theoretical suspend time according to IBM , Or Is this not published....
0
 
LVL 68

Expert Comment

by:woolmilkporc
ID: 39857470
This is not published, as far as I know.
 
Certainly because it depends on too many things, but certainly also because IBM don't want to upset the apple cart (or want to let sleeping dogs lie, if you prefer).
0
 

Author Comment

by:aanya247
ID: 39857516
Thank you...
0

Featured Post

Announcing the Most Valuable Experts of 2016

MVEs are more concerned with the satisfaction of those they help than with the considerable points they can earn. They are the types of people you feel privileged to call colleagues. Join us in honoring this amazing group of Experts.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

In tuning file systems on the Solaris Operating System, changing some parameters of a file system usually destroys the data on it. For instance, changing the cache segment block size in the volume of a T3 requires that you delete the existing volu…
A metadevice consists of one or more devices (slices). It can be expanded by adding slices. Then, it can be grown to fill a larger space while the file system is in use. However, not all UNIX file systems (UFS) can be expanded this way. The conca…
Learn several ways to interact with files and get file information from the bash shell. ls lists the contents of a directory: Using the -a flag displays hidden files: Using the -l flag formats the output in a long list: The file command gives us mor…
Learn how to get help with Linux/Unix bash shell commands. Use help to read help documents for built in bash shell commands.: Use man to interface with the online reference manuals for shell commands.: Use man to search man pages for unknown command…

856 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question