Access - FrontEnd BackEnd Question

Hi,

I have a new database with perhaps 6 or 7 users - fairly lightweight user activity.

I will split it into backend and frontend.

It suits best (for reasons I won't go into) to simple split the database once and NOT on each users PC.   i.e. just one version of the frontend.

QUESTION: Is there benefit in splitting this way OR must I put a front end on each users PC?
Patrick O'DeaAsked:
Who is Participating?

[Product update] Infrastructure Analysis Tool is now available with Business Accounts.Learn More

x
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

mbizupCommented:
You really should put a front end on each user's computer.  That is accepted as best practice for a multitude of reasons.

- Better performance
- Less prone to corruption
- Allows you to have user-specific tables if temp tables are needed to create reports etc...
- and so on
0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
DatabaseMX (Joe Anderson - Microsoft Access MVP)Database Architect / Systems AnalystCommented:
If you want to minimize pain, heartache, suffering, depression, anxiety  and a LOT more ... then put a separate copy of the FE on each user's workstation - for the reasons list by mbizup.
Until you do this .... all bets are off when problems start happening ...

mx
0
Jim P.Commented:
I'll put a third vote for individual front ends, for all the same reasons.

If you are worried about version issues, there are multiple resolutions.

I have a limited term conversion utility Acc DB's that will be going out of use in a few months. I named the DB App_Convert_Util_V05.mdb. When the DB opens it does a directory search of \\Server\Share\App_Convert_Util_V*.mdb. If it finds a App_Convert_Util_V08.mdb it asks the user if they want the newer version, and then copies it to the user's desktop. The highest version is 62 currently of all the different utilities. Since I figure I'm not going to get to V99 I'm not worried.

In your case it sounds like a long term project and you have a concentrated BE, you can have a Version table in the FE and in the BE have another Version table linked to the FE. On DB open run something to compare the two tables and do a similar thing.

That will take a lot of the angst out of the problem.
0
Big Business Goals? Which KPIs Will Help You

The most successful MSPs rely on metrics – known as key performance indicators (KPIs) – for making informed decisions that help their businesses thrive, rather than just survive. This eBook provides an overview of the most important KPIs used by top MSPs.

Gustav BrockCIOCommented:
You may have your reasons, and it can be possible to run off a single FE file.

However, Access has a habit of writing temporary data into the FE and that may cause troubles. To prevent this, write-protect the physical file (right-click, Properties, mark Read-only). Then temporary data are forced into true temporary files.
This will bring up a warning when a user opens the file. That, however, can be avoided if you open the FE from a shortcut with the /runtime switch, which again may cause other troubles. But check it out.

/gustav
0
Armen Stein - Microsoft Access MVP since 2006PresidentCommented:
If you need more reasons to run the FE locally, here are two:

1. When rolling out a new version, you can't replace the old shared FE until everyone logs out.

As Jim said, a local FE can use fairly simple version checking code to check whether it is current and prompt the user to copy the latest version from the "master" on the server.

2. Related to mbizup's point about user-specific temp tables - sometimes it's handy to have session-specific queries (change the SQL property of a query in code).  These definitely need a local one-user FE.

Cheers,
Armen Stein
0
Patrick O'DeaAuthor Commented:
Folks,  I think the message is loud and clear!!

It will definitely be a split database !!
0
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Microsoft Access

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.