App-V 5.0 - Trying to make a virtual printer installed locally - Communicate with a virtual application

I am attempting to use APP-V (ThinAPP is available to me as well.) To virtualize Hyland's Unity Client, to connect to Onbase (ECM tool).

The application installs a virtual printer - that outputs images that are automatically picked up by the application, and an Upload window appears.

I realize that Printer cannot be virtualized, so I have it being installed via GPO at machine creation (We're running Non-persistent desktops in Vmware View 5.3).

So what I am looking for - is any ideas on how to make the Virtual Application's Virtual Printer listener (provided via a .DLL) either listen to a non virtualized folder - or to get it to listen to a folder internal to the application, being that I can modify the spooling Folder.

So far it appears that the spooling works correctly, but the application seems to be unaware of it, whereas in a local physical install, it works great.

Happy to clarify.
PemcoITAsked:
Who is Participating?

[Product update] Infrastructure Analysis Tool is now available with Business Accounts.Learn More

x
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

Squidly_ManCommented:
With ThinApp, you can define a folder within a virtualized app to use what is called MERGED isolation. Doing so would allow the virtualized app to write out the native drive on the same path.

For a good explanation of ThinApp isolation modes, see Peter Björk's blog / KB posting on the topic.

http://blogs.vmware.com/kb/2011/04/understanding-isolation-modes-in-vmware-thinapp.html
0
PemcoITAuthor Commented:
Thanks - I am aware of the Isolation modes within ThinAPP, although this particular App hasn't been very easy to virtualize in ThinAPP - Whereas APPV has been much more accomodating. I'll try again in thinAPP, and see if I can get it working.
0
PemcoITAuthor Commented:
It ended up being related to the COM objects being able to communicate. Once I enabled that, it picked it up no problem.
0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
Squidly_ManCommented:
Ahh, yes.  With ThinApp that is done by using the VirtualizeExternalOutOfProcessCOM=0 setting in the PACKAGE.INI file.

For anyone else reading this after the fact, see the ThinApp Package.INI Reference Guide for more information.
0
PemcoITAuthor Commented:
Ended up being COM objects - Which I eventually figured out.
0
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Virtualization

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.