Want to protect your cyber security and still get fast solutions? Ask a secure question today.Go Premium

x
  • Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 233
  • Last Modified:

Assert unique values for a struct member during compile.

I have an embedded application where I need to guarantee that a structure member has a unique value in a table of those structures. I need to ensure that the startingPosition is always unique.

const dataLogDefinition dataLogDefinitions PPAGE_E5 = {
		version:  PROTOCOL_VERSION,
		sizeOfEntry:  sizeof(dataLogField),
		entries: {
				 {.startingPosition = offsetof(CoreVar, IAT), .size = bitSize(CoreVar, IAT), .name = "IAT", .description = "Variable 1", 0,0},
				 {.startingPosition = offsetof(CoreVar, CHT), .size = bitSize(CoreVar, CHT), .name = "CHT", .description = "Variable 2", 0,0},
		}
};

Open in new window


Any ideas would be appreciated.
0
sean-keys
Asked:
sean-keys
  • 3
  • 3
1 Solution
 
Kent OlsenData Warehouse Architect / DBACommented:
Hi Sean,

Is the table static?  How many items are in the table?  Is uniqueness enough or do they also need to be sequential, non-descending, random, etc.
0
 
sean-keysAuthor Commented:
Hi,

Yes the table is static. The length will be variable but within reason 20-30 entries. They do not need to be sequential, I just need to make sure something does not end up in there twice.
0
 
sean-keysAuthor Commented:
https://git.libreems.org/libreems-suite/libreems-firmware/blob/dataLogDefProtocol/src/main/dataLogDefinitions.c

needs to describe the data here:

https://git.libreems.org/libreems-suite/libreems-firmware/blob/dataLogDefProtocol/src/main/inc/containerTypes.h#L72


The definitions need to remain seperate because they reside in flash while the other resides in RAM, which I have much less of.

Thanks!
0
Concerto's Cloud Advisory Services

Want to avoid the missteps to gaining all the benefits of the cloud? Learn more about the different assessment options from our Cloud Advisory team.

 
Kent OlsenData Warehouse Architect / DBACommented:
Easy enough.  :)

Note the two sample lines:

                         {.startingPosition = offsetof(CoreVar, IAT), .size = bitSize(CoreVar, IAT), .name = "IAT", .description = "Variable 1", 0,0},
                         {.startingPosition = offsetof(CoreVar, CHT), .size = bitSize(CoreVar, CHT), .name = "CHT", .description = "Variable 2", 0,0},

The first line contains the string "IAT" and the constant IAT.  IAT is defined in the header file.
The second line has the same characteristics, except that the values are "CHT" and CHT.

I suggest that you simply enumerate the items that you need.


enum
{
  SP_NULL=0,      // zero
  SP_IAT,
  SP_CHT,
  SP_TPS,
  SP_EGO,
  SP_MAP,
  SP_AAP,
  SP_BRV,
  SP_MAT,
  SP_MAX
};
0
 
sean-keysAuthor Commented:
I guess the "right" way to do this would be to have a script generate both C source files. It seems enum, is as good as it gets :)
0
 
Kent OlsenData Warehouse Architect / DBACommented:
Well, for the specific application that you've shown, I don't think that a random/unique value is sufficient.  I believe that the value is also an index into the array of values returned from the PIC controller.  

You'll want to initialize the value to the correct index value.
0

Featured Post

Upgrade your Question Security!

Your question, your audience. Choose who sees your identity—and your question—with question security.

  • 3
  • 3
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now