• Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 2717
  • Last Modified:

LSI MegaRaid 9240-8i

Hi Experts,
I have SuperMicro computer with LSI 9240-8i card and eight WD40EFRX drives.
There is RAID 5 volume with 64KB strip size over all eight drives.
I have current firmware, current driver, operating system is Windows Server 2012 R2.

Problem is write performance at all. Sequential write is 18MB/s. I think that is caused by my wrong setup, I could not believe performance of that card is that bad, any cheap piece of RAID crap performing much better.

That card cannot setup write or read cache, there are "no read ahead" and "write through" enabled and cannot be changed - as far as I believe.

Sequential read rate is about 350MB/s which is pretty good - it is far much for my needs...
0
Jan Vojtech Vanicek
Asked:
Jan Vojtech Vanicek
  • 3
  • 3
1 Solution
 
pgm554Commented:
Does that card have any cache at all?

I don't see any in the manuf spec.

And if I remember correctly ,you need an onboard battery to be able to turn on the cache anyway.

No cache ,sucko performance.
0
 
Jan Vojtech VanicekIT SpecialistAuthor Commented:
No there is no cache, but it is 8 disks. If I have just one it will be far faster than that... 18MBps in sequential write, thats very lazy, I cant believe that!
0
 
pgm554Commented:
Cache makes all the difference and you are running RAID 5 on top of that.

I never buy a hardware RAID controller for a file server without cache.

There are lots of folks that get a rude awakening thinking that an external RAID controller will be faster,it's faster,but only with battery backed cache.

I would try RAID 10 if you are married to that controller.

If you are adventurous,you could try RAID 1 for boot disks and set the other disks up as JBOD.

Then use the JBOD disks to set up REFS.

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/hh848060%28v=vs.85%29.aspx
0
What does it mean to be "Always On"?

Is your cloud always on? With an Always On cloud you won't have to worry about downtime for maintenance or software application code updates, ensuring that your bottom line isn't affected.

 
Jan Vojtech VanicekIT SpecialistAuthor Commented:
I had post that problem on LSI support... I just wont believe in such that lazy performance, Im not expecting rates as from expensive card, but 18MBps of sequentilar write is really too low.
I had try cheapest Silicon Image card with four disks and I had results about 60MBps... on RAID5
0
 
pgm554Commented:
Your limitation here is your raid controller.

Random writes like a large cache, and parity-based RAIDs like a fast parity calculator.

The more disks you add to a parity-based RAID array (like RAID 5 or 6) on a locally attached controller, the lower performance you'll see per spindle. Large direct attached storage (above 8 drives or so) tends to be raid 10 to avoid this issue.

 The only reason to use parity based RAID (5 or 6) is to benefit from a higher ratio of usable space.

The downside is that if you lose a drive, the rebuild will take more time if the RAID was a large one.

You can also try this:

Bring up the property page for your raid disk and select Policies.

Make sure that both Enable write-caching is on and also select "Turn off Windows write-cache buffer flushing on the device".
0
 
Jan Vojtech VanicekIT SpecialistAuthor Commented:
That controller is not good for RAID5, thank you all for clarify that
0

Featured Post

VIDEO: THE CONCERTO CLOUD FOR HEALTHCARE

Modern healthcare requires a modern cloud. View this brief video to understand how the Concerto Cloud for Healthcare can help your organization.

  • 3
  • 3
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now