Solved

LSI MegaRaid 9240-8i

Posted on 2014-03-03
6
2,470 Views
Last Modified: 2014-04-06
Hi Experts,
I have SuperMicro computer with LSI 9240-8i card and eight WD40EFRX drives.
There is RAID 5 volume with 64KB strip size over all eight drives.
I have current firmware, current driver, operating system is Windows Server 2012 R2.

Problem is write performance at all. Sequential write is 18MB/s. I think that is caused by my wrong setup, I could not believe performance of that card is that bad, any cheap piece of RAID crap performing much better.

That card cannot setup write or read cache, there are "no read ahead" and "write through" enabled and cannot be changed - as far as I believe.

Sequential read rate is about 350MB/s which is pretty good - it is far much for my needs...
0
Comment
Question by:Jan Vojtech Vanicek
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 3
  • 3
6 Comments
 
LVL 30

Expert Comment

by:pgm554
ID: 39901757
Does that card have any cache at all?

I don't see any in the manuf spec.

And if I remember correctly ,you need an onboard battery to be able to turn on the cache anyway.

No cache ,sucko performance.
0
 
LVL 6

Author Comment

by:Jan Vojtech Vanicek
ID: 39902547
No there is no cache, but it is 8 disks. If I have just one it will be far faster than that... 18MBps in sequential write, thats very lazy, I cant believe that!
0
 
LVL 30

Expert Comment

by:pgm554
ID: 39903621
Cache makes all the difference and you are running RAID 5 on top of that.

I never buy a hardware RAID controller for a file server without cache.

There are lots of folks that get a rude awakening thinking that an external RAID controller will be faster,it's faster,but only with battery backed cache.

I would try RAID 10 if you are married to that controller.

If you are adventurous,you could try RAID 1 for boot disks and set the other disks up as JBOD.

Then use the JBOD disks to set up REFS.

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/hh848060%28v=vs.85%29.aspx
0
Don't Miss ATEN at InfoComm 2017!

Visit booth #2167 to see the  new ATEN VM3200 32 x 32 Modular Matrix Switch. Other highlights include the VE8950 4K HDMI Over IP Extender, VS1912 12-Port DP Video Wall Media Player  and VK2100 ATEN Control System. Register now with Free Pass Code ATEN288!

 
LVL 6

Author Comment

by:Jan Vojtech Vanicek
ID: 39907126
I had post that problem on LSI support... I just wont believe in such that lazy performance, Im not expecting rates as from expensive card, but 18MBps of sequentilar write is really too low.
I had try cheapest Silicon Image card with four disks and I had results about 60MBps... on RAID5
0
 
LVL 30

Accepted Solution

by:
pgm554 earned 500 total points
ID: 39907175
Your limitation here is your raid controller.

Random writes like a large cache, and parity-based RAIDs like a fast parity calculator.

The more disks you add to a parity-based RAID array (like RAID 5 or 6) on a locally attached controller, the lower performance you'll see per spindle. Large direct attached storage (above 8 drives or so) tends to be raid 10 to avoid this issue.

 The only reason to use parity based RAID (5 or 6) is to benefit from a higher ratio of usable space.

The downside is that if you lose a drive, the rebuild will take more time if the RAID was a large one.

You can also try this:

Bring up the property page for your raid disk and select Policies.

Make sure that both Enable write-caching is on and also select "Turn off Windows write-cache buffer flushing on the device".
0
 
LVL 6

Author Closing Comment

by:Jan Vojtech Vanicek
ID: 39981082
That controller is not good for RAID5, thank you all for clarify that
0

Featured Post

Industry Leaders: We Want Your Opinion!

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Solid State (Hard) Drives aka SSD began to evolve in the computer industry recently. As the name suggests, there are no moving parts in the drives. The drive uses microchip memory store the data, as opposed to the spinning disks of a traditional HDD…
Usually shares are where we want them for our users and we tend to take them for granted. There are times, however, when those shares may disappear causing difficulty for your users. One of the first things to try is searching for files that shou…
This video Micro Tutorial explains how to clone a hard drive using a commercial software product for Windows systems called Casper from Future Systems Solutions (FSS). Cloning makes an exact, complete copy of one hard disk drive (HDD) onto another d…
This is a high-level webinar that covers the history of enterprise open source database use. It addresses both the advantages companies see in using open source database technologies, as well as the fears and reservations they might have. In this…

726 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question