Go Premium for a chance to win a PS4. Enter to Win

x
  • Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 204
  • Last Modified:

Remote Hosting vs Local Server

Hello Experts

Here's the deal:

My client has used a PC s a "server" from the beginning.  This "server' was offered by the software vendor completely configured.  It was the best option for a long time.  It is now time to look at a real server.  So we are considering the upgrade.  However, we also have the option of remote hosting.

So here is the question:

Our local network is  Gigabit.  With a server and 3 Gigabit connections, why should we expect as fast response from an internet connection of 6MB to a hosted server?

Shouldn't we expect  some latency?  

And if so, from the perspective of speed and latency, wouldn't  a local server be a better option?

I admit, I don't know much at all about remote hosting.  It just seems to me that a 1GB connection is superior to a 6MB connection.

Am I looking at this the right way?

thedslguy
0
thedslguy
Asked:
thedslguy
  • 2
  • 2
1 Solution
 
Dan CraciunIT ConsultantCommented:
What's this "server" supposed to do?

It's a server for a critical internal application? If so, it does make sense to keep it locally, or at least a hybrid variant to cover for internet outages.

It's a web server? Definitely host it on your ISP, so your clients can reach it faster.

It's a file server? Definitely keep it internal, as the 6MB pipe will be a serious bottleneck.

So unless you can be a little more precise on the purpose of the server, I can only guess and give general advice.

HTH,
Dan
0
 
thedslguyAuthor Commented:
Dan

It is a file and software server.

It houses a database as well as software for a vendor.

If yoe need more information, please let me know

tdg
0
 
Dan CraciunIT ConsultantCommented:
If it's a file server, keep it local.

For the application, it really depends on how much data it sends over the network and how many clients connect to the server.
Most ERP's I know have light network traffic unless they have a document management component, in which case they move gigabytes of scanned pdfs every day.

If you have the budget, I'd say go for a local version. You can even opt for a hybrid approach, where you have 2 servers, one local and one on the clouds, but that might be overkill.
0
 
thedslguyAuthor Commented:
I got what I needed with the first post.

Thanks!!

tdg
0

Featured Post

Lessons on Wi-Fi & Recommendations on KRACK

Simplicity and security can be a difficult  balance for any business to tackle. Join us on December 6th for a look at your company's biggest security gap. We will also address the most recent attack, "KRACK" and provide recommendations on how to secure your Wi-Fi network today!

  • 2
  • 2
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now