[Webinar] Streamline your web hosting managementRegister Today

x
  • Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 206
  • Last Modified:

Remote Hosting vs Local Server

Hello Experts

Here's the deal:

My client has used a PC s a "server" from the beginning.  This "server' was offered by the software vendor completely configured.  It was the best option for a long time.  It is now time to look at a real server.  So we are considering the upgrade.  However, we also have the option of remote hosting.

So here is the question:

Our local network is  Gigabit.  With a server and 3 Gigabit connections, why should we expect as fast response from an internet connection of 6MB to a hosted server?

Shouldn't we expect  some latency?  

And if so, from the perspective of speed and latency, wouldn't  a local server be a better option?

I admit, I don't know much at all about remote hosting.  It just seems to me that a 1GB connection is superior to a 6MB connection.

Am I looking at this the right way?

thedslguy
0
thedslguy
Asked:
thedslguy
  • 2
  • 2
1 Solution
 
Dan CraciunIT ConsultantCommented:
What's this "server" supposed to do?

It's a server for a critical internal application? If so, it does make sense to keep it locally, or at least a hybrid variant to cover for internet outages.

It's a web server? Definitely host it on your ISP, so your clients can reach it faster.

It's a file server? Definitely keep it internal, as the 6MB pipe will be a serious bottleneck.

So unless you can be a little more precise on the purpose of the server, I can only guess and give general advice.

HTH,
Dan
0
 
thedslguyAuthor Commented:
Dan

It is a file and software server.

It houses a database as well as software for a vendor.

If yoe need more information, please let me know

tdg
0
 
Dan CraciunIT ConsultantCommented:
If it's a file server, keep it local.

For the application, it really depends on how much data it sends over the network and how many clients connect to the server.
Most ERP's I know have light network traffic unless they have a document management component, in which case they move gigabytes of scanned pdfs every day.

If you have the budget, I'd say go for a local version. You can even opt for a hybrid approach, where you have 2 servers, one local and one on the clouds, but that might be overkill.
0
 
thedslguyAuthor Commented:
I got what I needed with the first post.

Thanks!!

tdg
0

Featured Post

SMB Security Just Got a Layer Stronger

WatchGuard acquires Percipient Networks to extend protection to the DNS layer, further increasing the value of Total Security Suite.  Learn more about what this means for you and how you can improve your security with WatchGuard today!

  • 2
  • 2
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now