?
Solved

3750 Cisco for VMware ESXi 5.5

Posted on 2014-03-05
10
Medium Priority
?
1,439 Views
Last Modified: 2014-03-10
Hello, I am building a small new VMware cluster with 2x Cisco C220 rack servers and 1 FAS2220 over NFS GbE

When searching for switches I came across the 3750's

Are these reliable for virtualization? I know of course they support VLAN trunking and stacking, i was just wondering if there might be something better in this price range?

Are the 3750's line rate forwarding capable?

We plan to use 6 GbE NIC's per server, one pair for management, one for vMotion/FT and one for storage (NFS).

Thanks!
0
Comment
Question by:sk391
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
10 Comments
 
LVL 26

Assisted Solution

by:Soulja
Soulja earned 336 total points
ID: 39907278
I can think of no reason the 3750's wouldn't work for you. There are the newer 3850's, but if you are talking about Gigabit 3750, they should work for you.
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:sk391
ID: 39907301
yes i see the 3850 is mostly marketed as access switch with functions we dont really need. Only 6 ports will be used on each switch.. basically as top of rack switches for 2 small racks.

yes the gigabit version is the one we are looking at..
0
 
LVL 13

Assisted Solution

by:Abhilash
Abhilash earned 332 total points
ID: 39907335
Yes 3750's would work good for you. I was going to tell you in your previous thread to purchase a switch so that you can connect these two components. I Actually left you a hint by telling how it is connected in flexpod.

I think its a good option to go ahead with 3750 switches.
0
NFR key for Veeam Agent for Linux

Veeam is happy to provide a free NFR license for one year.  It allows for the non‑production use and valid for five workstations and two servers. Veeam Agent for Linux is a simple backup tool for your Linux installations, both on‑premises and in the public cloud.

 
LVL 22

Accepted Solution

by:
mcsween earned 996 total points
ID: 39907339
You don't need layer 3 capabilities that come with that switch.  There are many cheaper options that will be just as reliable and perform just as well.  There is no sense in paying for Layer 3 if you are doing everything under Layer 2.  You only need Layer 3 if you want to do IP routing with the switch (router).

If you are going to use iSCSI; I suggest checking with your SAN vendor for a list of approved switches.  I use Equallogic SANs here and they do not support Cisco so I use a pair of Dell PowerConnect 6224s.

If you want a Cisco switch I suggest either Catalyst 2960S-48TD-L or Catalyst 2960S-24TD-L  (These are the same switch, one is 24 port the other is 48).  Just make sure you get one that is licensed for LAN Base and not LAN Lite as there are many options that are disabled on the LAN Lite version.

Overview - http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/switches/catalyst-2960-series-switches/product_data_sheet0900aecd80322c0c.html

24 Port Switch - http://www.amazon.com/Catalyst-WS-C2960S-24TS-L-2960-Gigabit-Switch/dp/B003ICXAWW/ref=sr_1_2?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1394047037&sr=1-2&keywords=2960s-24ps-l

48 Port Switch - http://www.amazon.com/Cisco-WS-C2960S-48TS-L-Catalyst-Series-Switch/dp/B003ICX55Y/ref=pd_bxgy_e_text_y

Stacking Module (if you want to stack them) - http://www.amazon.com/Cisco-Optional-Flexstack-Stacking-C2960S-STACK/dp/B003M4H2ES/ref=sr_1_1?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1394047346&sr=1-1&keywords=2960s+stack+module

The stack modules come with .5 meter cables so you shouldn't need to buy any cables.
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:sk391
ID: 39907358
Thanks I was looking at the 2960's too... I agree layer3 features are not needed on the VMware switches.

Is there any major advantage when stacking the switches, instead of just connecting them with both hosts? we will be using vSphere 5.5..
0
 
LVL 22

Assisted Solution

by:mcsween
mcsween earned 996 total points
ID: 39907374
The stack cable for those switches has 24GB of throughput instead of the 1GB or 10GB (depending on the port and SFP module you use) available on a standard trunk uplink.

You also manage the stack as one so you only have to assign 1 IP address, login to one switch, etc...  Port 1 on switch 1 is gi1/0/1, on switch 2 it would be gi2/0/1, etc...

I would use two switches with stacking modules and plug one NIC from each server into each switch.  So if you are planning on use 2 ports for NFS then plug one into switch 1 and one into switch 2.  Do the same with the NFS server.  This allows for full redundancy.  Use round robin for your load balancing on the ESXi servers.  If you go to iSCSI later look for a SAN that has a multipathing driver for ESXi, like equallogic.

If you are on a budget you can always use etherchannel and use a couple ports on the front of each switch to link them together.  This is less throughput but still likely sufficient.
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:sk391
ID: 39907405
yes that's a good point. the storage is a NetApp FAS2220 which has 2x 4 GBe NICs (it has two storage controllers and each controller comes with 4 GbE NICs) for the connection to the hosts, so we can probably do two 2GbE etherchannels (each of the two hosts has 3 NIC pairs, and one pair will be used for the storage traffic)
0
 
LVL 22

Assisted Solution

by:mcsween
mcsween earned 996 total points
ID: 39907455
If you are using that as your SAN I strongly suggest using iSCSI over NFS.  Then install the multipath module on your ESXi hosts.  Do not setup etherchannel on any ports connecting to hosts (SAN or ESXi) as the multipathing module will take care of load balancing.  Only setup etherchannel on the trunk uplink connecting the switches.

It looks like this SAN also has vmware integrated management.  This means there is likely a virtual appliance you have to setup in vmware.  I strongly suggest you do this and use the integrated manager to take your SAN level snapshots if you plan on doing that.
0
 
LVL 11

Assisted Solution

by:gmbaxter
gmbaxter earned 336 total points
ID: 39907588
I agree with the Cisco 29xx series of switches being better value for money for this scenario.
0
 
LVL 1

Author Closing Comment

by:sk391
ID: 39919140
Thanks for the thoughts

I also saw the Nexus 3048 but the list price is almost double that of 2960S, it seems they might only be used in very specific use cases? when connecting to larger networks probably in large deployments.
0

Featured Post

Ask an Anonymous Question!

Don't feel intimidated by what you don't know. Ask your question anonymously. It's easy! Learn more and upgrade.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

If we need to check who deleted a Virtual Machine from our vCenter. Looking this task in logs can be painful and spend lot of time, so the best way to check this is in the vCenter DB. Just connect to vCenter DB(default DB should be VCDB and using…
This article will show you how to create an ISO CD-ROM/DVD-ROM image (*.iso), and MD5 checksum signature, for use with VMware vSphere Hypervisor 6.5 (ESXi 6.5). It's a good idea to compare checksums, because many installations fail because of a corr…
Teach the user how to use create log bundles for vCenter Server or ESXi hosts Open vSphere Web Client: Generate vCenter Server and ESXi host log bundle:  Open vCenter Server Appliance Web Management interface and generate log bundle: Open vCenter Se…
This video shows you how to use a vSphere client to connect to your ESX host as the root user. Demonstrates the basic connection of bypassing certification set up. Demonstrates how to access the traditional view to begin managing your virtual mac…

649 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question