Solved

Exchange 2010 ARR

Posted on 2014-03-05
5
699 Views
Last Modified: 2014-03-17
Setting up a new Exchange 2010 environment with Server 2008R2 ARR IIS server for my front end OWA access.  Question is should I setup load balancing on my ARR server, or Windows NLB my Client Access Array and point my ARR server to the cluster?

I have tested both solutions and both seem to work, though I am not testing under a heavy load.

Setting up the load balance on ARR requires client affinity, while using NLB on the CA cluster automatically by design will connect the client with only one node.  (I believe)
0
Comment
Question by:Morikk
  • 3
5 Comments
 
LVL 31

Expert Comment

by:Gareth Gudger
ID: 39908526
Have you seen this article?
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff625247(v=exchg.141).aspx#affinity

I believe you are correct. You may have to go to a layer 7 hardware load balancer to accomplish this.
0
 

Author Comment

by:Morikk
ID: 39911197
Well using IIS ARR Client affinity cookie seems to work, and also using WNLB IP affinity is keeping the client on one node as well, so my question is which would be the preferred method.
0
 
LVL 63

Expert Comment

by:Simon Butler (Sembee)
ID: 39911825
The RPC CAS array address should NOT be used for anything other than MAPI TCP traffic. The address should be used internally only, for that service only and should not resolve externally.

The Exchange product team don't recommend the use of Windows NLB, which is a good thing because it sucks. I also cannot find anything that indicates that ARR on Windows 2008 R2 is supported. Therefore it doesn't really matter which solution you use, you are likely to be unsupported or have problems with either.
I can find Windows 2012 ARR guidelines with Exchange 2013 though.

I wouldn't have bothered with the separate CAS role servers myself, spent the money on a real load balancer instead.

Simon.
0
 

Accepted Solution

by:
Morikk earned 0 total points
ID: 39924441
Well as I have tested for a bit this week it appears using ARR affinity rules is the better choice out of the two.  I appreciate the info, but a hardware load balance solution is not possible at the moment

Using ARR affinity over WNLB has shown to be more reliable and even more responsive in my small amount of testing.
0
 

Author Closing Comment

by:Morikk
ID: 39933751
My choices for solution were WNLB or or MS ARR server using Client Affinity.
0

Featured Post

PRTG Network Monitor: Intuitive Network Monitoring

Network Monitoring is essential to ensure that computer systems and network devices are running. Use PRTG to monitor LANs, servers, websites, applications and devices, bandwidth, virtual environments, remote systems, IoT, and many more. PRTG is easy to set up & use.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Scam emails are a huge burden for many businesses. Spotting one is not always easy. Follow our tips to identify if an email you receive is a scam.
MS Outlook is a world-class email client application that is mainly used for e-communication globally.  In this article, we will discuss the basic idea about MS Outlook, its advanced features, and types of MS Outlook File formats.
In this video we show how to create an Address List in Exchange 2013. We show this process by using the Exchange Admin Center. Log into Exchange Admin Center.: First we need to log into the Exchange Admin Center. Navigate to the Organization >> Ad…
The video tutorial explains the basics of the Exchange server Database Availability groups. The components of this video include: 1. Automatic Failover 2. Failover Clustering 3. Active Manager

777 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question