Solved

Exchange 2010 ARR

Posted on 2014-03-05
5
675 Views
Last Modified: 2014-03-17
Setting up a new Exchange 2010 environment with Server 2008R2 ARR IIS server for my front end OWA access.  Question is should I setup load balancing on my ARR server, or Windows NLB my Client Access Array and point my ARR server to the cluster?

I have tested both solutions and both seem to work, though I am not testing under a heavy load.

Setting up the load balance on ARR requires client affinity, while using NLB on the CA cluster automatically by design will connect the client with only one node.  (I believe)
0
Comment
Question by:Morikk
  • 3
5 Comments
 
LVL 30

Expert Comment

by:Gareth Gudger
ID: 39908526
Have you seen this article?
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff625247(v=exchg.141).aspx#affinity

I believe you are correct. You may have to go to a layer 7 hardware load balancer to accomplish this.
0
 

Author Comment

by:Morikk
ID: 39911197
Well using IIS ARR Client affinity cookie seems to work, and also using WNLB IP affinity is keeping the client on one node as well, so my question is which would be the preferred method.
0
 
LVL 63

Expert Comment

by:Simon Butler (Sembee)
ID: 39911825
The RPC CAS array address should NOT be used for anything other than MAPI TCP traffic. The address should be used internally only, for that service only and should not resolve externally.

The Exchange product team don't recommend the use of Windows NLB, which is a good thing because it sucks. I also cannot find anything that indicates that ARR on Windows 2008 R2 is supported. Therefore it doesn't really matter which solution you use, you are likely to be unsupported or have problems with either.
I can find Windows 2012 ARR guidelines with Exchange 2013 though.

I wouldn't have bothered with the separate CAS role servers myself, spent the money on a real load balancer instead.

Simon.
0
 

Accepted Solution

by:
Morikk earned 0 total points
ID: 39924441
Well as I have tested for a bit this week it appears using ARR affinity rules is the better choice out of the two.  I appreciate the info, but a hardware load balance solution is not possible at the moment

Using ARR affinity over WNLB has shown to be more reliable and even more responsive in my small amount of testing.
0
 

Author Closing Comment

by:Morikk
ID: 39933751
My choices for solution were WNLB or or MS ARR server using Client Affinity.
0

Featured Post

Don't lose your head updating email signatures!

Do your end users still have the wrong email signature? Do email signature updates bore you or fill you with a sense of dread? You can make this a whole lot easier on yourself by trusting an Exclaimer email signature management solution. Over 50 million users do...so should you!

Join & Write a Comment

We are happy to announce a brand new addition to our line of acclaimed email signature management products – CodeTwo Email Signatures for Office 365.
Not sure what the best email signature size is? Are you worried about email signature image size? Follow this best practice guide.
In this video we show how to create a Contact in Exchange 2013. We show this process by using the Exchange Admin Center. Log into Exchange Admin Center.: First we need to log into the Exchange Admin Center. Navigate to the Recipients >> Contact ta…
In this video we show how to create an Accepted Domain in Exchange 2013. We show this process by using the Exchange Admin Center. Log into Exchange Admin Center.: First we need to log into the Exchange Admin Center. Navigate to the Mail Flow >> Ac…

708 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question

Need Help in Real-Time?

Connect with top rated Experts

12 Experts available now in Live!

Get 1:1 Help Now