Solved

Exchange 2010 ARR

Posted on 2014-03-05
5
727 Views
Last Modified: 2014-03-17
Setting up a new Exchange 2010 environment with Server 2008R2 ARR IIS server for my front end OWA access.  Question is should I setup load balancing on my ARR server, or Windows NLB my Client Access Array and point my ARR server to the cluster?

I have tested both solutions and both seem to work, though I am not testing under a heavy load.

Setting up the load balance on ARR requires client affinity, while using NLB on the CA cluster automatically by design will connect the client with only one node.  (I believe)
0
Comment
Question by:Morikk
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 3
5 Comments
 
LVL 31

Expert Comment

by:Gareth Gudger
ID: 39908526
Have you seen this article?
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff625247(v=exchg.141).aspx#affinity

I believe you are correct. You may have to go to a layer 7 hardware load balancer to accomplish this.
0
 

Author Comment

by:Morikk
ID: 39911197
Well using IIS ARR Client affinity cookie seems to work, and also using WNLB IP affinity is keeping the client on one node as well, so my question is which would be the preferred method.
0
 
LVL 63

Expert Comment

by:Simon Butler (Sembee)
ID: 39911825
The RPC CAS array address should NOT be used for anything other than MAPI TCP traffic. The address should be used internally only, for that service only and should not resolve externally.

The Exchange product team don't recommend the use of Windows NLB, which is a good thing because it sucks. I also cannot find anything that indicates that ARR on Windows 2008 R2 is supported. Therefore it doesn't really matter which solution you use, you are likely to be unsupported or have problems with either.
I can find Windows 2012 ARR guidelines with Exchange 2013 though.

I wouldn't have bothered with the separate CAS role servers myself, spent the money on a real load balancer instead.

Simon.
0
 

Accepted Solution

by:
Morikk earned 0 total points
ID: 39924441
Well as I have tested for a bit this week it appears using ARR affinity rules is the better choice out of the two.  I appreciate the info, but a hardware load balance solution is not possible at the moment

Using ARR affinity over WNLB has shown to be more reliable and even more responsive in my small amount of testing.
0
 

Author Closing Comment

by:Morikk
ID: 39933751
My choices for solution were WNLB or or MS ARR server using Client Affinity.
0

Featured Post

Has Powershell sent you back into the Stone Age?

If managing Active Directory using Windows Powershell® is making you feel like you stepped back in time, you are not alone.  For nearly 20 years, AD admins around the world have used one tool for day-to-day AD management: Hyena. Discover why.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

This article explains how to install and use the NTBackup utility that comes with Windows Server.
A list of top three free exchange EDB viewers that helps the user to extract a mailbox from an unmounted .edb file and get a clear preview of all emails & other items with just a single click on mailboxes.
To show how to create a transport rule in Exchange 2013. We show this process by using the Exchange Admin Center. Log into Exchange Admin Center.: First we need to log into the Exchange Admin Center. Navigate to the Mail Flow >> Rules tab.:  To cr…
In this Micro Video tutorial you will learn the basics about Database Availability Groups and How to configure one using a live Exchange Server Environment. The video tutorial explains the basics of the Exchange server Database Availability grou…

740 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question