Look at this Flash vs Html5 version of the same animation. Is Html5 slower?
I obtained from a Flash developer an animation done in both Flash and Html5:
Flash version: http://goo.gl/YK0sS6
Html5 version: http://goo.gl/5hCvDW
On my Android default browser on my Galaxy Note II (quad-core 1.6Ghz) the Flash version is totally fluid while the Html5 version has a very low framerate.
Are the html5 animations with many objects/layers renownedly slower than Flash or there's something wrong in the Htm5 code?
Flash version: http://goo.gl/YK0sS6
Html5 version: http://goo.gl/5hCvDW
On my Android default browser on my Galaxy Note II (quad-core 1.6Ghz) the Flash version is totally fluid while the Html5 version has a very low framerate.
Are the html5 animations with many objects/layers renownedly slower than Flash or there's something wrong in the Htm5 code?
Big Monty
Using Chrome on my PC, both seem to play at the same speed. Have you tried multiple platforms for your testing?
You would be hard pressed to notice a difference.
Is this a flash to canvas conversion? As it is throwing a lot of styles around.
Is this a flash to canvas conversion? As it is throwing a lot of styles around.
ASKER
Gary, I think that the developer re-made it from scratch in Html5 because he changed some effects...
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Here's an example using just a few lines of css.
http://www.useragentman.com/blog/2013/03/03/animating-circular-paths-using-css3-transitions/#
Repeat this 20, 30 +++ times, wouldn't matter
This is how your 'flash' should be done - it would be ultra smooth and not start hogging memory/cpu like it currently does.
edit
That is not going to work on your IE9 - but at 3% global usage and dropping you shouldn't be worrying about it
http://www.useragentman.com/blog/2013/03/03/animating-circular-paths-using-css3-transitions/#
Repeat this 20, 30 +++ times, wouldn't matter
This is how your 'flash' should be done - it would be ultra smooth and not start hogging memory/cpu like it currently does.
edit
That is not going to work on your IE9 - but at 3% global usage and dropping you shouldn't be worrying about it
ASKER
> Repeat this 20, 30 +++ times, wouldn't matter
How do you know it?
If you look at my html current animation you'll see that it uses 13% (my PC) CPU too, but it's not smooth, it's 10-15fps... while the Flash versions seems 25-30fps at 13-15% CPU too.
Seems like CPU usage in a single Chrome page never goes above 13-15% on my Windows 7, Core i7 PC, like if it were an external limitation...
How do you know it?
If you look at my html current animation you'll see that it uses 13% (my PC) CPU too, but it's not smooth, it's 10-15fps... while the Flash versions seems 25-30fps at 13-15% CPU too.
Seems like CPU usage in a single Chrome page never goes above 13-15% on my Windows 7, Core i7 PC, like if it were an external limitation...
Chrome jumps to about 70% cpu and FF to 100% from idle.
Memory on both increase about 200mb
On a dual core - not everyone has an i7 ;o)
Memory on both increase about 200mb
On a dual core - not everyone has an i7 ;o)