Solved

dermatology forums?

Posted on 2014-03-08
9
103 Views
Last Modified: 2014-03-22
What are the most active forums on the web about skin issues (dermatology)?
0
Comment
Question by:lucavilla
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 4
  • 4
9 Comments
 
LVL 53

Accepted Solution

by:
Scott Fell,  EE MVE earned 500 total points
ID: 39915269
0
 
LVL 21

Expert Comment

by:viki2000
ID: 39926292
I know does not answer directly to your question, but is something we should bear in mind: the solar cycle and the skin cancer, with possible maximums of ultraviolet radiation for the present year.
Around each 11 years a maximum is expected.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_cycle
http://www.nasa.gov/vision/universe/solarsystem/solar_cycle.html


From here:
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/sunearth/news/solarcycle-primer.html

"The sun is currently ramping up once again to solar maximum, so flares and CMEs are more common than they were a few years ago. This cycle may peak in late 2013, or early 2014, and should reach a minimum around 2020—although predictions about the sun's cycle are still quite uncertain. This has been the slowest sunspot cycle of the space age, which is the time frame during which we have the most detailed observations."


http://solarscience.msfc.nasa.gov/SunspotCycle.shtml
http://solarscience.msfc.nasa.gov/predict.shtml
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/sunearth/spaceweather/#.UyGxXVcSZ8E

My advice: pay attention to your skin during the summer time of the present year, and maybe next year more than you did in the previous years.
0
 

Author Comment

by:lucavilla
ID: 39926636
viki2000: some numbers about how much more UV radiation there will be?
0
Free Tool: Site Down Detector

Helpful to verify reports of your own downtime, or to double check a downed website you are trying to access.

One of a set of tools we are providing to everyone as a way of saying thank you for being a part of the community.

 
LVL 21

Expert Comment

by:viki2000
ID: 39927539
0
 

Author Comment

by:lucavilla
ID: 39938948
viki2000: interesting general infos but why we on the Earth should be adviced to worry about a maximum variation of 1 out 1365 between the highest peak of the 11yrs cycle and the minimum peak?
0
 
LVL 21

Expert Comment

by:viki2000
ID: 39939036
We cannot predict exactly the moment of peaks, we only observed some cycles.
We also cannot predict the time of the maximum peak during solar explosions and the maximum radiation of UV which will come. We can only measure it when arrives.
There is enough skin burning during normal summer Sun and enough skin cancer results.
You do not need to expose yourself more when we expect the maximum UV radiation compared with the rest of the years.
An unpredicted big explosion can destroy also the satellites due to electromagnetic interference.
It is better to know and avoid if you can.
I can tell you with certitude that also the UV light from solar beds, solar studios are harmful.
I worked in a factory where we produced UV lamps and I know about the radiation instability of the lamps.
In Europe, few years ago, if I remember right 2010, due to continuous warning of the doctors in media regarding the skin cancer, a new limit of UV radiation of the lamps for sun studios was adopted, the standard was changed with lower limits and one of my colleagues had to travel to different customers in different European countries to change the lamps with new type lower radiation and to measure the radiation for different beds.
Then, if at what we theoretical can "control" are so many problems, what do you expect at the Sun when goes trough maximum of radiation, when a "normal" summer time can burn your skin if you do not pay attention?
I can search more numbers and references if you are interested, but I do not have too much tome now.
Just take it as a big warning for the moment.
0
 

Author Comment

by:lucavilla
ID: 39940043
I  really doesn't understand why I should consider these <0.1% peaks in my worries, as in past the peaks never surpassed 0.1% difference with the minimum.

It's like to put a "big warning" signal where the swim is 10.01m deep in a 10m deep swimming pool that has already a "warning" signal because of the depth.
That 1mm difference on 10m is superfluous.
One of your link explains that the problem exists only out of the terrestrial atmosphere.
0
 

Author Comment

by:lucavilla
ID: 39940048
because out of the terrestrial atmosphere the difference is much bigger than 0.1%
0

Featured Post

Free Tool: IP Lookup

Get more info about an IP address or domain name, such as organization, abuse contacts and geolocation.

One of a set of tools we are providing to everyone as a way of saying thank you for being a part of the community.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Since 2008, the stock markets have been in a haphazard state of fluctuation. At times it has been a steep decline (2008) and at others, a steady incline full of promise (2010). Just weeks ago, in August 2011, together we saw the stock markets plunge…
Stuck in voice control mode on your Amazon Firestick?  Here is how to turn it off!!!
The Bounty Board allows you to request an article or video on any technical topic, or fulfill a bounty request to earn points. Watch this video to learn how to use the Bounty Board to get the content you want, earn points, and browse submitted bount…
Saved searches can save you time by quickly referencing commonly searched terms on any topic. Whether you are looking for questions you can answer or hoping to learn about a specific issue, a saved search can help you get the most out of your time o…

717 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question