Go Premium for a chance to win a PS4. Enter to Win

x
?
Solved

Problem with UPDATE TABLE1 FROM TABLE2 in SQL Server 2005

Posted on 2014-03-12
2
Medium Priority
?
683 Views
Last Modified: 2014-03-12
Running code on SQL Server 2005, and code is inserting rows from our tbl_extract table into our tbl_target table.

tbl_extract - sample data

GLMCU          GLOBJ_ObjectAccount   DomesticAmount

BBIF054978     5130                              1021
BBIF054978     5130                              15610

We can have multiple entries for each GLMCU value.

tbl_target is then populated so that we have an equivalent row for every row from tbl_extract (number of columns on tbl_target has been cut down for legibility)
but at that stage the Rep_Sales column is specifically set to 0

tbl_target - sample data

Tour           Rep_Sales              

BBIF054978     0
BBIF054978     0

Just as we can have multiple entries for each GLMCU value on tbl_extract, we can also have multiple entries for each Tour value on tbl_target.

Later on in processing, we try to set our Rep_Sales values with the following statement :

UPDATE tbl_target
SET Rep_Sales = f.DomesticAmount
FROM tbl_extract f  
WHERE
tbl_target.Tour = f.GLMCU
AND f.GLOBJ_ObjectAccount
IN
('5130', '5120', '5134')

After that statement our tbl_target contents are

Tour           Rep_Sales              

BBIF054978     1021
BBIF054978     1021

So the first entry for Tour BBIF054978 on tbl_target has a Rep_Sales value of 1021 and so is obviously correct.  But instead of the second entry for
Tour BBIF054978 on tbl_target having a Rep_Sales value of 15610 as required, it also ends up with a Rep_Sales value of 1021.

How can I code the update statement so that it picks up BOTH of the values for DomesticAmount from the tbl_extract table ?

Note that we are using SQL Server 2005.

Thanks in advance for any assistance here.
0
Comment
Question by:raymurphy
2 Comments
 
LVL 143

Accepted Solution

by:
Guy Hengel [angelIII / a3] earned 2000 total points
ID: 39923411
I had written an article about UPDATE with JOIN:
http://www.experts-exchange.com/Database/Miscellaneous/A_1517-UPDATES-with-JOIN-for-everybody.html

it will also explain what the problem is here: you don't seem to have a row-to-row joining condition. the value of BBIF054978      alone cannot help which row to update, so unless you have a second field to uniquely identify/order the rows, it will be "impossible" to solve this request.

please clarify
0
 

Author Comment

by:raymurphy
ID: 39923615
Thanks for the prompt reply, Guy, and for the link to your article which was very interesting and useful. Have now resolved this problem by adding an id column to both tables and the using that for the row-row joining condition, which now gives the required results ...
0

Featured Post

Ask an Anonymous Question!

Don't feel intimidated by what you don't know. Ask your question anonymously. It's easy! Learn more and upgrade.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Ever needed a SQL 2008 Database replicated/mirrored/log shipped on another server but you can't take the downtime inflicted by initial snapshot or disconnect while T-logs are restored or mirror applied? You can use SQL Server Initialize from Backup…
Windocks is an independent port of Docker's open source to Windows.   This article introduces the use of SQL Server in containers, with integrated support of SQL Server database cloning.
Via a live example, show how to set up a backup for SQL Server using a Maintenance Plan and how to schedule the job into SQL Server Agent.
Via a live example, show how to setup several different housekeeping processes for a SQL Server.

885 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question