Solved

Windows Update has never been turned on so................

Posted on 2014-03-13
8
207 Views
Last Modified: 2014-03-18
I am working for a client and found out that they have never had Windows Updates turned on for the Windows Server 2008 and SQl Server 2008 web server.

There are 127 updates since 2011 and also SP2 has never been run for the SQL Server 2008 R2.

So I do realize that trying to run them all at once is high risk. And I won't be doing that.

Are there any secrets to the best method of running them? Do I look at the dates and run them by dates? Or how do I assure I'm getting them in the right order?

(If they were run all at once, would MS get them in the right order?)

I have run them all at once on systems where there are over 100 and that was bad news which I don't want to revisit.

Plus there are a lot of things that they say they update that I don't even know what those things are. Should I just ignore those?
ie: Best Practices Analyzer for....

And there are 3.5.1 framework updates. And I am not using 3.5 I am using 4.5. Should I run the 3.5 updates or skip those?

There are updates for IE10 and IE11, and this machine has IE8. So?

thanks!
0
Comment
Question by:BobCSD
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2
  • +1
8 Comments
 
LVL 5

Accepted Solution

by:
Joe Jenkins earned 500 total points
ID: 39927954
I typically will install service packs first.  Then the highest IE and then only the frameworks that I use in my environment.  Doing that will eliminate a lot of those updates.  

As for 3.5.1, a lot of software out there uses 3.5.1 so it's possible that at least one piece of software on your machine is using that framework and thus it will need to be installed and updated.

The longest part of your entire update process will be the .NET framework installations/updates.  They take entirely too long in my opinion but it has always been that way.
0
 
LVL 26

Expert Comment

by:pony10us
ID: 39927974
I typically will install service packs first.


This is a good plan since "usually" service packs include previous interim updates. That should eliminate a lot of them.
0
 
LVL 5

Expert Comment

by:Joe Jenkins
ID: 39927988
Correct, they "wrap-up" those smaller ones.  Installing one service pack could wipe out may of those updates.
0
 
LVL 75

Expert Comment

by:Anthony Perkins
ID: 39930760
As to the SQL Server Service Packs, what specific problem are you trying to fix?  If it is just so that you can have a warm feeling that all is well in the world, think again.
0
What Should I Do With This Threat Intelligence?

Are you wondering if you actually need threat intelligence? The answer is yes. We explain the basics for creating useful threat intelligence.

 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:BobCSD
ID: 39932228
Anthony,
Wow. That's useful. Let's pose a feeling of dread but don't back it up with anything.

I always install service packs for a warm feeling that all is well in the world. Isn't that why Microsoft releases them?
0
 
LVL 75

Expert Comment

by:Anthony Perkins
ID: 39932744
I think you are missing the point and it really depends on your setup.  If you are managing half a dozen servers in different environments, then certainly it is doable to update with the latest Service Pack.  I would however never consider upgrading with the latest CU unless I was trying to address a specific problem,
However, from my experience, I would not recommend this practice in an enterprise with dozens of servers in different environments.  It just makes no sense whatsoever, where you have anything more than a casual testing phase.

P.S.  If you would rather I did not contribute, feel free to say so.  You may not like my answers, however it is my belief that t is not appropriate to encourage bad practices that can easily be confirmed by anyone that has some experience using SQL Server.
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:BobCSD
ID: 39933093
Thanks.
0
 
LVL 1

Author Closing Comment

by:BobCSD
ID: 39937875
thanks!
0

Featured Post

Zoho SalesIQ

Hassle-free live chat software re-imagined for business growth. 2 users, always free.

Join & Write a Comment

Lync server 2013 Backup Service Error ID 4049 – After File Share Migration
Use this article to create a batch file to backup a Microsoft SQL Server database to a Windows folder.  The folder can be on the local hard drive or on a network share.  This batch file will query the SQL server to get the current date & time and wi…
This tutorial will give a short introduction and overview of Backup Exec 2012 and how to navigate and perform basic functions. Click on the Backup Exec button in the upper left corner. From here, are global settings for the application such as conne…
This tutorial will show how to configure a new Backup Exec 2012 server and move an existing database to that server with the use of the BEUtility. Install Backup Exec 2012 on the new server and apply all of the latest hotfixes and service packs. The…

706 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question

Need Help in Real-Time?

Connect with top rated Experts

20 Experts available now in Live!

Get 1:1 Help Now