sync lock for datatables

I have a dataset with several datatables which are variably updated and refilled from the database. From time to time I get exceptions about corrupted indexes and I suspect that they are related to simultaneous modification of the datatables from different threads.

So, I have a couple of questions:
1. What is the best way to synchronize these activities?
2. When using sync lock, what object should I lock? should I use the datatable itself? Is there any benefit in using datatable.syncroot?

For example (ds is a dataset containing several tables; da is dataadapter)

'in response to user action
SyncLock ds.Tables("Master")
     ' modify rows in table Master
End SyncLock

'elsewhere, runs once every 60 seconds
SyncLock ds.Tables("Master")
     da.Fill(ds, "Master")
End SyncLock

Open in new window



Here is an example error
System.ArgumentNullException occurred
  HResult=-2147467261
  Message=Value cannot be null.
Parameter name: key
  ParamName=key
  Source=mscorlib
  StackTrace:
       at System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary`2.FindEntry(TKey key)
       at System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary`2.get_Item(TKey key)
       at System.Data.DataView.MaintainDataView(ListChangedType changedType, DataRow row, Boolean trackAddRemove)
       at System.Data.Listeners`1.Notify[T1,T2,T3](T1 arg1, T2 arg2, T3 arg3, Action`4 action)
       at System.Data.Index.MaintainDataView(ListChangedType changedType, Int32 record, Boolean trackAddRemove)
       at System.Data.Index.InsertRecord(Int32 record, Boolean fireEvent)
       at System.Data.Index.ApplyChangeAction(Int32 record, Int32 action, Int32 changeRecord)
       at System.Data.DataTable.RecordStateChanged(Int32 record1, DataViewRowState oldState1, DataViewRowState newState1, Int32 record2, DataViewRowState oldState2, DataViewRowState newState2)
       at System.Data.DataTable.SetNewRecordWorker(DataRow row, Int32 proposedRecord, DataRowAction action, Boolean isInMerge, Boolean suppressEnsurePropertyChanged, Int32 position, Boolean fireEvent, Exception& deferredException)
       at System.Data.DataTable.LoadDataRow(Object[] values, Boolean fAcceptChanges)
       at System.Data.ProviderBase.SchemaMapping.LoadDataRow()
       at System.Data.Common.DataAdapter.FillLoadDataRow(SchemaMapping mapping)
       at System.Data.Common.DataAdapter.FillFromReader(DataSet dataset, DataTable datatable, String srcTable, DataReaderContainer dataReader, Int32 startRecord, Int32 maxRecords, DataColumn parentChapterColumn, Object parentChapterValue)
       at System.Data.Common.DataAdapter.Fill(DataSet dataSet, String srcTable, IDataReader dataReader, Int32 startRecord, Int32 maxRecords)
       at System.Data.Common.DbDataAdapter.FillInternal(DataSet dataset, DataTable[] datatables, Int32 startRecord, Int32 maxRecords, String srcTable, IDbCommand command, CommandBehavior behavior)
       at System.Data.Common.DbDataAdapter.Fill(DataSet dataSet, Int32 startRecord, Int32 maxRecords, String srcTable, IDbCommand command, CommandBehavior behavior)
       at System.Data.Common.DbDataAdapter.Fill(DataSet dataSet, String srcTable)
       at Documenter.clsDB2.DAFill(DBTable dbt) in C:\Users\mankowitzs\Documents\Visual Studio 2010\Projects\Documenter\Documenter\ClassDB2.vb:line 1207
  InnerException: 

Open in new window

LVL 24
mankowitzAsked:
Who is Participating?
 
CodeCruiserCommented:
Datatable level locking should work.
0
 
mankowitzAuthor Commented:
ok
0
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

All Courses

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.