Solved

Cisco Secure ACS Replication Problem

Posted on 2014-03-18
8
1,064 Views
Last Modified: 2014-04-11
Hello Experts,

We're having a problem getting our primary Cisco Secure ACS, UK-SU-AP091 to replicate with our secondary Cisco Secure ACS, UK-SU-AP092. The version of ACS is 5.2. See attachment.

Any help will be greatly appreciated.

Cheers

Carlton
0
Comment
Question by:cpatte7372
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 6
  • 2
8 Comments
 

Author Comment

by:cpatte7372
ID: 39937153
Forgot the attachment
Cisco-Secure-ACS.pdf
0
 

Author Comment

by:cpatte7372
ID: 39937374
Experts,

As you can see from the attached, the replication is stuck in pending..

Any help will be greatly appreciated...

Cheers
ciscoACS.PNG
0
 

Author Comment

by:cpatte7372
ID: 39937492
Experts,

We're scratching our heads why the secondary server keeps on saying offline....
0
Easy, flexible multimedia distribution & control

Coming soon!  Ideal for large-scale A/V applications, ATEN's VM3200 Modular Matrix Switch is an all-in-one solution that simplifies video wall integration. Easily customize display layouts to see what you want, how you want it in 4k.

 

Author Comment

by:cpatte7372
ID: 39937958
Can I get some help here?
0
 
LVL 46

Accepted Solution

by:
Craig Beck earned 500 total points
ID: 39939718
I remember something about this being a cosmetic issue a while back.

If you make a change on the primary then immediately check the replication status does it come back online, then go offline a few minutes later?
0
 

Author Comment

by:cpatte7372
ID: 39941830
Hi Craig,

Thanks for getting back to me.

You suggestion may well be correct, however it happens to fast to be able to tell.

How have you dealt with this problem in the past?

Cheers mate.
0
 
LVL 46

Expert Comment

by:Craig Beck
ID: 39941862
I haven't actually seen this with 5.2, only 5.1, but Cisco said it was cosmetic and that the replication would happen, just that the secondary would look like it's offline after a couple of minutes due to a bug.

If you note the replication ID then make a change, check the replication ID a few seconds/minutes later.  If the ID increments that usually means that replication was successful.

In the end we upgraded to 5.4 though as the customer wasn't happy with seeing the secondary look like it was offline all the time.
0
 

Author Closing Comment

by:cpatte7372
ID: 39993999
cheers
0

Featured Post

Technology Partners: We Want Your Opinion!

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Creating an OSPF network that automatically (dynamically) reroutes network traffic over other connections to prevent network downtime.
Quality of Service (QoS) options are nearly endless when it comes to networks today. This article is merely one example of how it can be handled in a hub-n-spoke design using a 3-tier configuration.
After creating this article (http://www.experts-exchange.com/articles/23699/Setup-Mikrotik-routers-with-OSPF.html), I decided to make a video (no audio) to show you how to configure the routers and run some trace routes and pings between the 7 sites…
After creating this article (http://www.experts-exchange.com/articles/23699/Setup-Mikrotik-routers-with-OSPF.html), I decided to make a video (no audio) to show you how to configure the routers and run some trace routes and pings between the 7 sites…

697 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question