Want to protect your cyber security and still get fast solutions? Ask a secure question today.Go Premium

x
?
Solved

Calculate number of days between months avoiding oracle analytic functions

Posted on 2014-03-21
11
Medium Priority
?
776 Views
Last Modified: 2014-03-27
I will like to know how  can I calculate the differences of two dates in a table avoiding the use of Oracle analytic functions and subqueries.
 
I have a table of product sales and I will like to know how sales have been going eversince consumers started buying it(Table 1). I need to get the minimum date of each product when sales started and subtract it from successive dates and show the relative sale. I know I can achieve it using analytic functions like ( DENSE_RANK FIRST ORDER BY)  or subqueries.  If possible I will like  to avoid it  . The result I will like to have is available in Table 2

Period      Prod       Sale
200810      ref              2
200811      ain              6
200811      ref              3
200812      ain              7
200812      del              3
200901      ain              9
200901      ref              5
200901      del             4
            
Table 1

Here is the result I will like to expect.

Prod      Period      Min_Date      Month_Diff      Sale
ref      200810      200810      0                       2
ain      200811      200811      0                       6
ref      200811      200810      1                        3
ain       200812      200811      1                        7
del      200812      200812      0                        3
ref      200901      200810      3                        5
del      200901      200812      4                        5
Table 2

DB: Oracle 10g
0
Comment
Question by:diteps06
  • 3
  • 3
  • 3
  • +1
11 Comments
 
LVL 49

Expert Comment

by:PortletPaul
ID: 39945206
why are you trying to avoid analytic functions?
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:diteps06
ID: 39945304
The reason is that there will be a group by in the final query and analytic functions aren't compatible with it
0
 
LVL 74

Assisted Solution

by:sdstuber
sdstuber earned 675 total points
ID: 39945537
what is the final query you're trying to achieve?
0
What does it mean to be "Always On"?

Is your cloud always on? With an Always On cloud you won't have to worry about downtime for maintenance or software application code updates, ensuring that your bottom line isn't affected.

 
LVL 32

Expert Comment

by:awking00
ID: 39945564
A few questions.
Why is there no record for product ain for period 200901 in your expected results?
Why do you show a month_diff of 4 and a sale of 5 for prod del for period 200901 and a min_date of 200812 in your expected results?
What do you gain with a group by statement in your final query that can't be accomplished with a partition by clause in an analytical query?
0
 
LVL 32

Assisted Solution

by:awking00
awking00 earned 300 total points
ID: 39945569
Also, given your sample data, what do you expect as the end result of your "final" query?
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:diteps06
ID: 39945752
"Why is there no record for product ain for period 200901 in your expected results?"
Sorry ain had to be in the expected result

"Why do you show a month_diff of 4 and a sale of 5 for prod del for period 200901"
Sorry again for the error
" and a min_date of 200812 in your expected results?"
del has minimum date 200812 is the first record in the table. The minimum date represents the first month is starts its sale which is the first time it appears in the table.
There can be a month where there is no sale (ref in 200812)

Here is the updated version  of the expected result:
Prod      Period        Min_Date      Month_Diff     Sale
ref         200810      200810          0                     2
ain        200811       200811          0                    6
ref        200811       200810          1                     3
ain       200812       200811           1                    7
del       200812       200812           0                    3
ref       200901       200810           3                     5
del      200901       200812           1                     4
ain      200901       200811            2                    9
Table 2

"What do you gain with a group by statement in your final query that can't be accomplished with a partition by clause in an analytical query?"
The monthly is a sum of the daily sales. In the query I have to use SUM to get the total in a month. Consequently there will be a group by clause.
Group by clause and analytic functions aren't compatible.

If there are no other alternative we can try subqueries.
0
 
LVL 74

Assisted Solution

by:sdstuber
sdstuber earned 675 total points
ID: 39945955
>>> Group by clause and analytic functions aren't compatible.

why do you say that?

what are you "really" trying to do?
0
 
LVL 32

Expert Comment

by:awking00
ID: 39946005
"select sum(daily_sales) over (partition by prod, period order by period) as monthly_sales"
will create a sum of daily_sales for each prod and period without requiring a group by clause.
0
 
LVL 49

Accepted Solution

by:
PortletPaul earned 525 total points
ID: 39946992
Another question. What is the data type of "period"?

You refer to this field as dates ("can I calculate the differences of two dates") but they aren't actually dates that are shown. They could be integers or strings.

Below they have been interpreted as integers, so you can see the importance of knowing what that field really is.
| PROD | PERIOD | MIN_PERIOD | T.PERIOD-INQ.MIN_PERIOD | SALE |
|------|--------|------------|-------------------------|------|
|  ain | 200811 |     200811 |                       0 |    6 |
|  ain | 200812 |     200811 |                       1 |    7 |
|  ain | 200901 |     200811 |                      90 |    9 |
|  del | 200812 |     200812 |                       0 |    3 |
|  del | 200901 |     200812 |                      89 |    4 |
|  ref | 200810 |     200810 |                       0 |    2 |
|  ref | 200811 |     200810 |                       1 |    3 |
|  ref | 200901 |     200810 |                      91 |    5 |

SELECT
        t.prod
      , t.period
      , inq.min_period
      , t.period - inq.min_period
      , t.sale
FROM table1 t
INNER JOIN (
            SELECT
                  prod
                , min(period) AS min_period
            FROM table1
            GROUP BY prod
           ) inq ON t.prod = inq.prod
ORDER BY
        t.prod
      , t.period
;

http://sqlfiddle.com/#!4/838a6/8

Open in new window

0
 
LVL 74

Expert Comment

by:sdstuber
ID: 39954012
B penalty grade is not appropriate here, please explain or RA for moderator to correct.
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:diteps06
ID: 39959408
RA
0

Featured Post

Concerto's Cloud Advisory Services

Want to avoid the missteps to gaining all the benefits of the cloud? Learn more about the different assessment options from our Cloud Advisory team.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Why doesn't the Oracle optimizer use my index? Querying too much data Most Oracle developers know that an index is useful when you can use it to restrict your result set to a small number of the total rows in a table. So, the obvious side…
Configuring and using Oracle Database Gateway for ODBC Introduction First, a brief summary of what a Database Gateway is.  A Gateway is a set of driver agents and configurations that allow an Oracle database to communicate with other platforms…
This video shows how to copy a database user from one database to another user DBMS_METADATA.  It also shows how to copy a user's permissions and discusses password hash differences between Oracle 10g and 11g.
This video shows how to recover a database from a user managed backup
Suggested Courses

580 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question