Windows File Server OS

Hi All,

I was wondering for OS selection what OS is preferred.

My application is simple, Windows DFS (only 2 nodes so basically mirror) on a closed network serving files to up to 8 clients at a time (these clients need a high file transfer rate at 128k at a times) through 10 gig.

What OS should I choose?  I like Enterprise because I can use more than 32 GB of RAM, but do I really need more than 32 GB?  When I have been running my tests I never see a high usage of RAM, maybe there is a way to turn this on on Enterprise (large file cache)?  My clients are only doing reads so no data is changing...

Right now I need to stay in 2008 and can't move to 2012 for customer requirement reasons.

Thanks!
adamc817Asked:
Who is Participating?
 
Norm DickinsonConnect With a Mentor GuruCommented:
In your situation it seems to me that the disk array hardware will be more important in terms of speed and availability than the OS version. 32 GB of RAM should be sufficient to handle anything that 8 clients can require for read-only access.
0
 
adamc817Author Commented:
Hi Norm,

Thanks, is there any documentation I can point to that I can show management that corresponds to this? (Maybe it would save a lot of testing on my side to prove it).

Thanks!
0
 
Norm DickinsonGuruCommented:
This comparison shows that the only thing lacking from Standard edition is clustering, so if that is a consideration, you would want to go to DataCenter or Enterprise.
http://www.techotopia.com/index.php/Windows_Server_2008_Editions_and_System_Requirements

Standard also limits you to one DFS root. See the attached PDF.
WS-Brand-Pages---Editions-Compar.pdf
0
Has Powershell sent you back into the Stone Age?

If managing Active Directory using Windows Powershell® is making you feel like you stepped back in time, you are not alone.  For nearly 20 years, AD admins around the world have used one tool for day-to-day AD management: Hyena. Discover why.

 
Lee W, MVPTechnology and Business Process AdvisorCommented:
It doesn't matter.  Buy TWO 2012 standard Licenses, install 2008 Enterprise.  The 2012 licenses give downgrade rights to Enterprise since the feature sets are now identical other then additional VM licenses included.  There's really no point in NOT installing enterprise if anyone is going to give you the slightest argument for it.
0
 
Tony GiangrecoCommented:
I agree with Lee. Stay with 2008 Enterprise and you are probably the most compatible with most hardware and software technologies because it's been out for a while and it's very dependable.
0
 
Norm DickinsonGuruCommented:
Agreed that it probably makes a lot more sense to go with the Enterprise edition in the long run. There is really no downside to it.
0
 
adamc817Author Commented:
>>Right now I need to stay in 2008 and can't move to 2012 for customer requirement reasons.


So 2012 is not an option, also in 2008 Enterprise is a bit more expensive than standard and there is no need for 128 GB of RAM when standard can only use 32, so there is some $$ difference.  I am just not sure Enterprise is worth the upgrade.
0
 
Norm DickinsonGuruCommented:
If it were the same price it would be an easy decision but it is likely not going to be worth a lot of effort or a lot of money to have Enterprise vs. Standard in your case. I believe what Lee W was saying is that if you buy 2012 Standard, it gives you the license for 2008 Enterprise if you prefer to install that instead. If you are buying the server OS now, that may be the way to go.
0
 
adamc817Author Commented:
oh snap, awesome! nice
0
 
Lee W, MVPTechnology and Business Process AdvisorCommented:
You buy 2012 Standard via Volume license and you get downgrade rights to 2008 Standard OR Enterprise AND the media and keys.
0
 
Norm DickinsonGuruCommented:
Hopefully we have answered your question at this stage, best of luck to you and let us know if you have anything else we can help with!
0
 
Tony GiangrecoCommented:
Any other questions regarding this posting?
0
All Courses

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.