• Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 970
  • Last Modified:

Is using a Synology DS1813+ as a SAN for Hyper-v a good idea?

Can anyone confirm whether using a DS1813+ as a SAN for Hyper-v works well?  I've used it with VMware and it worked pretty well, but that was with non-intensive VMs and no High Availability.

Basically, I am going to setup a DS1813+ using iSCSI to connect to the Hyper-v hypervisors and use High Availability.  I know that the device is more of a NAS than a SAN, but the savings is so good over say a Nimble device.  Thoughts?
0
Tim Phillips
Asked:
Tim Phillips
  • 2
1 Solution
 
Aaron TomoskyTechnology ConsultantCommented:
It all depends on your iops needs and to a lesser extent throughput. Nimble is more than most people need for a small setup but it's really really nice if you need that level of performance.
0
 
Tim PhillipsAuthor Commented:
How do I determine my iops needs?  My VMs will be: Win2012 DC, Quickbooks server, Veeam server, System Center, Avaya VoIP and an anti-virus server.  No e-mail (using Google Apps).

I've been told by the Avaya vendor that the VoIP server takes very little resources ("8GB RAM and any multicore CPU").
0
 
Aaron TomoskyTechnology ConsultantCommented:
I have the avaya voicemail server in a vm and it doesn't use much at all. same with my 2012dc. Id STRONGLY suggest a second dc on bare metal, personally I put mine on an old laptop in the far corner of the building. You don't ever want to rebuild a single failed dc. Also rebooting your virtual infrastructure without dns and dhcp isn't fun.

Veeam is actually more resource hungry than any of your app servers. I run my veeam in a vm but on local storage on one of my machines.
0

Featured Post

Concerto's Cloud Advisory Services

Want to avoid the missteps to gaining all the benefits of the cloud? Learn more about the different assessment options from our Cloud Advisory team.

  • 2
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now