Solved

Excel Lookup/Formula Expert Help Please

Posted on 2014-03-25
11
200 Views
Last Modified: 2014-04-11
I have the following formula which I believe is double dipping numbers

=SUMIFS('all deals'!K:K,'all deals'!H:H,{"Commit","Upside"},'all deals'!N:N,"Civilian") + SUMIFS('all deals'!K:K,'all deals'!E:E,"*Forecast*",'all deals'!N:N,"Civilian")

The requirement should be:

Give me the total of all deals that have column (N=Civilian and (H=Commit or Upside, OR E=Contains Forecast))
0
Comment
Question by:Matt Pinkston
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • +1
11 Comments
 
LVL 39

Expert Comment

by:nutsch
ID: 39954145
Subtract
SUMIFS('all deals'!K:K,'all deals'!H:H,{"Commit","Upside"},'all deals'!N:N,"Civilian",'all deals'!E:E,"*Forecast*")

=SUMIFS('all deals'!K:K,'all deals'!H:H,{"Commit","Upside"},'all deals'!N:N,"Civilian") + SUMIFS('all deals'!K:K,'all deals'!E:E,"*Forecast*",'all deals'!N:N,"Civilian")-SUMIFS('all deals'!K:K,'all deals'!H:H,{"Commit","Upside"},'all deals'!N:N,"Civilian",'all deals'!E:E,"*Forecast*")
0
 
LVL 23

Expert Comment

by:NBVC
ID: 39954171
I am not sure about that.

I tested using your original formula and it didn't seem to double dip.

It gave a result of unique rows matching either of the criteria.

So if E contains Forecast and H is Commit, it would still count as 1 match.
0
 
LVL 50

Expert Comment

by:barry houdini
ID: 39954220
If you want an OR the way you say then I don't think you can do that easily with SUMIFS - try SUMPRODUCT like this:

=SUMPRODUCT('all deals'!K:K,(('all deals'!H:H="Commit")+('all deals'!H:H="Upside")+ISNUMBER(SEARCH("forecast",'all deals'!E:E))>0)*('all deals'!N:N="Civilian"))

The K column is summed if N = "Civilian" and any one or more of the other conditions is fulfilled for columns H or E

although it will be quicker to use a specific range rather than whole columns

regards, barry
0
Technology Partners: We Want Your Opinion!

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

 
LVL 50

Expert Comment

by:barry houdini
ID: 39954230
Thomas, for your suggestion to work you need to wrap the first and third SUMIFS in a SUM function, i.e.

=SUM(SUMIFS('all deals'!K:K,'all deals'!H:H,{"Commit","Upside"},'all deals'!N:N,"Civilian")) + SUMIFS('all deals'!K:K,'all deals'!E:E,"*Forecast*",'all deals'!N:N,"Civilian")-SUM(SUMIFS('all deals'!K:K,'all deals'!H:H,{"Commit","Upside"},'all deals'!N:N,"Civilian",'all deals'!E:E,"*Forecast*"))

That's because using {"Commit","Upside"} in SUMIFS returns an "array" of two values which need to be summed

regards, barry
0
 

Author Comment

by:Matt Pinkston
ID: 39954902
With
=SUMIFS('all deals'!K:K,'all deals'!H:H,{"Commit","Upside"},'all deals'!N:N,"Civilian") + SUMIFS('all deals'!K:K,'all deals'!E:E,"*Forecast*",'all deals'!N:N,"Civilian")

I could have had deals that met the Commit or Update and had Forecast in column E The it would be double counted for the second part
0
 

Author Comment

by:Matt Pinkston
ID: 39954905
So what the logic really needs to be is

total of all deals that have column (N=Civilian and (H=Commit or Upside AND E= does NOT Contain Forecast))

PLUS
 
total of all deals where column E Contains Forecast
0
 
LVL 39

Expert Comment

by:nutsch
ID: 39954931
=SUMIFS('all deals'!K:K,'all deals'!H:H,"Commit",'all deals'!N:N,"Civilian",'all deals'!E:E,"<>Forecast" ) + SUMIFS('all deals'!K:K,'all deals'!H:H,"Upside",'all deals'!N:N,"Civilian",'all deals'!E:E,"<>Forecast" ) +SUMIFS('all deals'!K:K,'all deals'!E:E,"*Forecast*")
0
 

Author Comment

by:Matt Pinkston
ID: 39955351
=SUMIFS('all deals'!K:K,'all deals'!H:H,"Commit",'all deals'!N:N,"Civilian",'all deals'!E:E,"<>Forecast" ) + SUMIFS('all deals'!K:K,'all deals'!H:H,"Upside",'all deals'!N:N,"Civilian",'all deals'!E:E,"<>Forecast" ) +SUMIFS('all deals'!K:K,'all deals'!E:E,"*Forecast*")

Is getting way to big a number, I think the <>Forecast is not right
0
 
LVL 23

Expert Comment

by:NBVC
ID: 39955870
With
=SUMIFS('all deals'!K:K,'all deals'!H:H,{"Commit","Upside"},'all deals'!N:N,"Civilian") + SUMIFS('all deals'!K:K,'all deals'!E:E,"*Forecast*",'all deals'!N:N,"Civilian")

I could have had deals that met the Commit or Update and had Forecast in column E The it would be double counted for the second part

In my tests, it didn't double count.
0
 
LVL 50

Accepted Solution

by:
barry houdini earned 500 total points
ID: 39957005
Hello Pinkstonmp, did you try either of my suggestions above? - I think they both do what you are asking....although the SUMIFS version can be shortened, i.e.

=SUM(SUMIFS('all deals'!K:K,'all deals'!H:H,{"Commit","Upside"},'all deals'!N:N,"Civilian",'all deals'!E:E,"<>*Forecast*"))+SUMIFS('all deals'!K:K,'all deals'!E:E,"*Forecast*",'all deals'!N:N,"Civilian")

or this version with SUMPRODUCT

=SUMPRODUCT('all deals'!K:K,(('all deals'!H:H="Commit")+('all deals'!H:H="Upside")+ISNUMBER(SEARCH("forecast",'all deals'!E:E))>0)*('all deals'!N:N="Civilian"))

With both of those the K column is summed if N = "Civilian" and any one or more of the other conditions is fulfilled for columns H or E

They should both get the same results

regards, barry
0
 

Author Closing Comment

by:Matt Pinkston
ID: 39995457
SUPER
0

Featured Post

Online Training Solution

Drastically shorten your training time with WalkMe's advanced online training solution that Guides your trainees to action. Forget about retraining and skyrocket knowledge retention rates.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Introduction This Article briefly covers methods of calculating the NPV and IRR variants in Excel as well as the limitations in calculating and interpreting IRR results. Paraphrasing Richard Shockley, author of my favourite finance reference tex…
This tutorial explains how to create a series of drop-down lists that are dependent upon prior selections to guide (“force”) the user to make the correct selection and reduce data errors within Microsoft Excel. Excel 2010 was used for this tutorial;…
This Micro Tutorial demonstrate the bugs in Microsoft Excel for Mac with Pivot Charts.
Excel styles will make formatting consistent and let you apply and change formatting faster. In this tutorial, you'll learn how to use Excel's built-in styles, how to modify styles, and how to create your own. You'll also learn how to use your custo…

738 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question