Solved

Safe to upgrade my 2008 R2 file server to 2012 R2?

Posted on 2014-03-25
3
1,080 Views
Last Modified: 2014-03-25
I have a virtualized 2008 R2 file server running DFS and using ISCSI initiators to connect to 4 drives on a SAN.

What concerns, risks, or issues do you think there might be to doing an in place upgrade to 2012 R2? I want some of the new DFSR capabilities.

Yes, I have backups. Restoring would suck. Getting a maintenance window is painful. Before I go down the road, Im just looking for someone (or a few someones) to say "yep, Id feel comfortable doing it"

And secondly is it advantageous / necessary to disconnect the ISCSI drives before doing the upgrade? They're 4, 4, 10, and 4 TB respectively.
0
Comment
Question by:Eric_Price
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 2
3 Comments
 
LVL 17

Assisted Solution

by:Brad Bouchard
Brad Bouchard earned 500 total points
ID: 39954653
I can tell you that some of the new capabilities with DFSR would be worth it in my opinion.  I haven't taken a DFS server from 2k8 to 2k12, but I have taken a DFS/File Server from 2k8 to 2k8 r2 that had iSCSI targets and for the most part everything went fine.  I say most part, because I had to re-discover my targets, but once I did and then refreshed in Disk Management everything was all fine and dandy.

Hopefully you don't have to do that, but that would be the only thing I'd watch for.
0
 
LVL 17

Accepted Solution

by:
Brad Bouchard earned 500 total points
ID: 39954657
And secondly is it advantageous / necessary to disconnect the ISCSI drives before doing the upgrade? They're 4, 4, 10, and 4 TB respectively.

Forgot to answer this.  It's not advantageous or necessary, but you might not have to rediscover the targets if you disconnect them before the upgrade like I mentioned in my first post.

Really you're not going to hose anything on the data side of the server as long as your SAN doesn't crash which shouldn't have any correlation to your VM.

The one thing I would mention is that if the system/Windows volume for this VM is on the SAN then you will have to keep at least that target for iSCSI.
0
 
LVL 1

Author Closing Comment

by:Eric_Price
ID: 39954739
Excellent comments, and pretty much what I anticipated would be said. Sometimes, I just worry about overlooking something obvious because I'm too close. Especially where a file server connected to TBs of business critical data is concerned.
0

Featured Post

Enterprise Mobility and BYOD For Dummies

Like “For Dummies” books, you can read this in whatever order you choose and learn about mobility and BYOD; and how to put a competitive mobile infrastructure in place. Developed for SMBs and large enterprises alike, you will find helpful use cases, planning, and implementation.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

What to do when Windows Update is not working correctly? What tools can I use to detect the cause of the malfunction problem? What does this numeric error code mean? These and other questions that you have been asking in the past are answered here (…
This article explains how to install and use the NTBackup utility that comes with Windows Server.
This tutorial will walk an individual through locating and launching the BEUtility application and how to execute it on the appropriate database. Log onto the server running the Backup Exec database. In a larger environment, this would generally be …
This tutorial will show how to configure a single USB drive with a separate folder for each day of the week. This will allow each of the backups to be kept separate preventing the previous day’s backup from being overwritten. The USB drive must be s…

726 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question