Solved

Safe to upgrade my 2008 R2 file server to 2012 R2?

Posted on 2014-03-25
3
1,099 Views
Last Modified: 2014-03-25
I have a virtualized 2008 R2 file server running DFS and using ISCSI initiators to connect to 4 drives on a SAN.

What concerns, risks, or issues do you think there might be to doing an in place upgrade to 2012 R2? I want some of the new DFSR capabilities.

Yes, I have backups. Restoring would suck. Getting a maintenance window is painful. Before I go down the road, Im just looking for someone (or a few someones) to say "yep, Id feel comfortable doing it"

And secondly is it advantageous / necessary to disconnect the ISCSI drives before doing the upgrade? They're 4, 4, 10, and 4 TB respectively.
0
Comment
Question by:Eric_Price
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 2
3 Comments
 
LVL 17

Assisted Solution

by:Brad Bouchard
Brad Bouchard earned 500 total points
ID: 39954653
I can tell you that some of the new capabilities with DFSR would be worth it in my opinion.  I haven't taken a DFS server from 2k8 to 2k12, but I have taken a DFS/File Server from 2k8 to 2k8 r2 that had iSCSI targets and for the most part everything went fine.  I say most part, because I had to re-discover my targets, but once I did and then refreshed in Disk Management everything was all fine and dandy.

Hopefully you don't have to do that, but that would be the only thing I'd watch for.
0
 
LVL 17

Accepted Solution

by:
Brad Bouchard earned 500 total points
ID: 39954657
And secondly is it advantageous / necessary to disconnect the ISCSI drives before doing the upgrade? They're 4, 4, 10, and 4 TB respectively.

Forgot to answer this.  It's not advantageous or necessary, but you might not have to rediscover the targets if you disconnect them before the upgrade like I mentioned in my first post.

Really you're not going to hose anything on the data side of the server as long as your SAN doesn't crash which shouldn't have any correlation to your VM.

The one thing I would mention is that if the system/Windows volume for this VM is on the SAN then you will have to keep at least that target for iSCSI.
0
 
LVL 1

Author Closing Comment

by:Eric_Price
ID: 39954739
Excellent comments, and pretty much what I anticipated would be said. Sometimes, I just worry about overlooking something obvious because I'm too close. Especially where a file server connected to TBs of business critical data is concerned.
0

Featured Post

Transaction Monitoring Vs. Real User Monitoring

Synthetic Transaction Monitoring Vs. Real User Monitoring: When To Use Each Approach? In this article, we will discuss two major monitoring approaches: Synthetic Transaction and Real User Monitoring.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

A safe way to clean winsxs folder from your windows server 2008 R2 editions
I was prompted to write this article after the recent World-Wide Ransomware outbreak. For years now, System Administrators around the world have used the excuse of "Waiting a Bit" before applying Security Patch Updates. This type of reasoning to me …
This tutorial will walk an individual through the steps necessary to join and promote the first Windows Server 2012 domain controller into an Active Directory environment running on Windows Server 2008. Determine the location of the FSMO roles by lo…
This tutorial will walk an individual through the process of transferring the five major, necessary Active Directory Roles, commonly referred to as the FSMO roles from a Windows Server 2008 domain controller to a Windows Server 2012 domain controlle…

705 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question