Improve company productivity with a Business Account.Sign Up

x
  • Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 679
  • Last Modified:

Ways to speed up my Outlook search of archived 200,000 emails

I have 200,000 emails in my Outlook pst file.

Q1:
Can I place the entire pst in an SSD & it will return the searches
faster?  (Somehow I have a 250GB SSD in my storeroom but
can't locate it for the last one week)?

Q2:
Will Outlook 2010 search faster than Outlook 2003?

Q3:
If I can't locate my SSD, can I create a RAMDisk & place
the pst in RAMDisk & it will search faster?  Or will placing
it in an SD or Thumb Drive make it search faster considering
that SD & thumb drives are electronic flash / NVRAM
technologies that do not involve mechanical disk seeks
/rotation?

Q4:
I guess there's no way to 'cache' it or is there a way?

Q5:
Faster CPU won't help right?  As I see from Task Manager,
the CPU is only 10-20% during the searches
0
sunhux
Asked:
sunhux
  • 12
  • 8
  • 3
  • +1
8 Solutions
 
englanddgCommented:
What is the physical size of your .pst?

Upgrading to at least Outlook 2010 will certainly help.  It handles large psts much better then 2003.
0
 
sunhuxAuthor Commented:
I have about 5 PSTs :
smallest is 500MB, largest is 3.5GB

But I guess the number of emails in a PST counts too
as more emails mean more indexes, right?  If I have
only a few hundred emails each with huge attachments,
the search will be fast, right?
0
 
englanddgCommented:
I'm not sure what "speed" you are looking for, but I'd start by moving to Outlook 2010 or later...if you have a copy available, and try from there.

There were major improvements in how features like that are handled.
0
Easily Design & Build Your Next Website

Squarespace’s all-in-one platform gives you everything you need to express yourself creatively online, whether it is with a domain, website, or online store. Get started with your free trial today, and when ready, take 10% off your first purchase with offer code 'EXPERTS'.

 
pgm554Commented:
SSD will speed things up significantly .
It's a no brainer.

Ram disk would too,but SSD is cheaper.

Even if you went with caching SSD ,that would help.

OL2003/7 and above can have 20 gb pst files.
0
 
englanddgCommented:
Is it one large pst, or a combination of smaller ones?

In any case, @pgm554 isn't wrong.

However, the answer isn't all hardware.
0
 
nobusCommented:
you can speed things up by :
-installing more Ram
-using an SSD for the pst (and /or  OS) - which i believe will give the best boost
and as said, upgrading to newer version too; but , if possible, make the pst file smaller, by archiving into several files (per year, or month)
0
 
sunhuxAuthor Commented:
Thanks.  Just to reply to englanddg, yes, I have several PST files:
they range in various sizes.  If there's no further responses,
will close this thread tomorrow
0
 
sunhuxAuthor Commented:
Need someone to answer Q3:
Will placing the PST files on an SD card or USB thumb
drive help (in case I can't locate my SSD in the store room)?

>not sure what "speed" you are looking for
I'm looking at the search results to be returned within
10 secs of that 200,000 emails.

Is there a search function within Outlook which only search
for the Subject/Title of the emails without searching the
content (or text in the body) of the emails?  Maybe this will
be faster
0
 
sunhuxAuthor Commented:
>Need someone to answer Q3:
Will placing the PST files on an SD card or USB thumb
drive help (in case I can't locate my SSD in the store room)?

Reason for the above query is: I thought USB thumb drive
& SD card do not have rotation/seek delays, just that USB
2 or USB 3 has a throughput limitation.  Isn't it during the
slow searches on HDD, it's the rotational/seek delays that's
the main cause of the slow search?
0
 
nobusCommented:
see my answer, regarding Ram and SSD
0
 
sunhuxAuthor Commented:
Nobus, you did answer on Ramdisk & SSD but not
on USB Thumb drive & SD card
0
 
nobusCommented:
i doubt these will be faster, since they have to pass across a slower interface...
that's why i found it so obvious not to mention them
it's like running an SSD from USB
0
 
pgm554Commented:
USB thumb drives vary widely in terms of read and write speed.

You could try ready boost if the thumb drives or SSD card supports it.

http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows7/products/features/readyboost
0
 
nobusCommented:
i agree they have varying write speeds, but they are bottlenecked by the usb 2. or 3. speed : 480 Mb sec, or 4.8 Gb sec
0
 
pgm554Commented:
The cheapies have horrible write speeds.

Got a couple of generic 32 gig at the local computer chain and they were slower than a 5400 rpm usb disk.
0
 
sunhuxAuthor Commented:
> bottlenecked by the usb 2. or 3. speed
But if we have the 3.5GB pst file in it & what's being passed through the
USB 2 or 3 channels are the few search results, would the USB 2/3
still be the bottleneck?  The search took place within the SD or USB
thumb drive where there's no rotational/seek delay.

I'll just test it out & update here since I've just freed up enough space
on my SD.  Btw what's SDHC's throughput.  Nobus had given USB 2
& 3's throughputs
0
 
nobusCommented:
sunhux -  it's very easy to test
do it on  a local disk, an SSD, and an usb device.
the SDHC speed is given by the number in the C (class) :   http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/SD-kaart

c
0
 
sunhuxAuthor Commented:
Copied to an SD card: on a Win XP laptop with Outlook 2003, it practically
hangs when reading it & then gave a message "Can't display folder"

On a Win 7 Profsnl laptop with 8GB RAM & Outlook 2010, it opened it fine
but the indexing takes very long;  just listing the emails in that PST takes
a couple of hours.

The search took much longer than the same search on HDD.  So I guess
USB thumb drive & SD card is out.

Outlook 2010 has some performance improvement but certainly not
what I'm looking for, even if the pst is copied to a 7200rpm HDD on
that Win 7 laptop.

The hunt for the misplaced SSD is now needed
0
 
sunhuxAuthor Commented:
I can't read Dutch, so from the English Wiki link, it says 25MBytes/s
for SDHC :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secure_Digital

So if I can't find my SSD in the store room, I'll just use Ramdisk &
do a sync (or Unix ported tool rsync) to the HDD (from the Ramdisk
copy)
0
 
nobusCommented:
>>  I can't read Dutch,  <<  that's what i supposed; but you can use google translate to read it
what SDHC card class do you have?  youleft out that importabnnt part
0
 
sunhuxAuthor Commented:
It's SDHC.


> Is there a search function within Outlook which only search
> for the Subject/Title of the emails without searching the
> content (or text in the body) of the emails?
I've found the above function in Outlook 2010 but not in
Outlook 2003.  Certainly faster.
0
 
sunhuxAuthor Commented:
The emails are coming in at a rate of about 1,500 per day, so even
Outlook Rules to filter & sort them to different subfolders don't
work.

I receive more than 98% monitoring/alerting emails from BMC
Patrol & Sitescope & some other tools  & the monitoring team
had never been able to tune them.

My aim was to delete away mails with "Warning" in subject
heading & those of "High Memory utilizations"
0
 
sunhuxAuthor Commented:
>Outlook Rules to filter & sort them to different subfolders don't work
Rather it works occasionally only
0
 
nobusCommented:
>>  what SDHC card class do you have?   <<  it should be ON the card!
0
 
sunhuxAuthor Commented:
Yes, it's printed on the card as SDHC with a number 4
& Kingston 8GB
0
 
nobusCommented:
then it's speed is 4Mbytes, see the screen above
of course, if your system handles  higher sd card speeds, you could install a class 10 to get 10Mbyte
0
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

Join & Write a Comment

Featured Post

Get 10% Off Your First Squarespace Website

Ready to showcase your work, publish content or promote your business online? With Squarespace’s award-winning templates and 24/7 customer service, getting started is simple. Head to Squarespace.com and use offer code ‘EXPERTS’ to get 10% off your first purchase.

  • 12
  • 8
  • 3
  • +1
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now