EIGRP network statement

Posted on 2014-03-27
Last Modified: 2014-03-28
My Cisco router has 2 interfaces, and I am using EIGRP. Now if I advertise as:

router eigrp 99
no auto-summary

How will the neighbor see and through the advertise by this router.

Question by:leblanc
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 3
  • 3
LVL 25

Assisted Solution

by:Ken Boone
Ken Boone earned 500 total points
ID: 39960269
So this is a common misunderstanding about the network statement on most routing protocols - rip, ospf, eigrp  

The network statement in these routing protocols does not announce that network from these routing protocols.  Now in BGP that is exactly what it does, but not in the interior protocols.

What the network statement of does is say if any interface on this router can fall under the realm of /8 then allow that interface to participate in in the EIGRP process by exchanging routes with neighbors as well as advertise the network that is associated to that particular interface.

So network will match those two interfaces of and and will advertise those two networks to the neighbors.  

So the network statement is NOT telling the route to advertise what is stated in the network statement but rather tells the router to check all of your interfaces against this network statement and if it falls within the match then advertise that interfaces network and let that interface participate in the EIGRP process.

Hope that helps!

Author Comment

ID: 39960318
Clear as crystal... Now you mention that it is not the same in BGP. In other words, if you have network, then it will advertise the whole /8 network. Do I understand that correctly?
LVL 25

Assisted Solution

by:Ken Boone
Ken Boone earned 500 total points
ID: 39960728
well in BGP you use the network command in order to advertise a specific prefix.    So if you did network mask then yes that would advertise BGP to its neighbor.

See BGP works off of a TCP connection between two ip addresses.  It doesn't work off of the idea that an interface is involved with sending multicast or broadcast packets to its peers.

That is why there is a difference.  Typically in interior routing protocols your neighbors are directly connected.  That is not necessarily the case with BGP.
Technology Partners: We Want Your Opinion!

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!


Author Comment

ID: 39961526
About BGP, I have 40 subnets under the network. Somebody told me that for security reason, I should advertise those 40 subnets, rather than just Is that true? I don't think I agree with that. Thoughts?
LVL 25

Accepted Solution

Ken Boone earned 500 total points
ID: 39961634
Well I am assuming that if you are doing BGP with a 10 net then this is for an MPLS type network - not an internet connection.

I don't think it is so much of a security issue but rather a preference.  It is not so much a security issues because you are advertising on a private network given my assumption in the first sentence.  If all of those 40 subnets are behind one location, then advertising it as a /8 saves on the routing table at all those remote routers - however, with 40 subnets this is negligible.  

I prefer to advertise all the nets in that example, because then I know my entire routing process is up and running and if I don't see particular routes I know where the source of my problem is.

I think it is easier to troubleshoot when you have all of your routes in the table.  If you summarize and then a remote can't reach one of the subnets, you look and hey the remote has the /8 route whereas if it doesn't have the /24 then you know for some reason that particular /24 has an issue.  Its really a preference.  

Now when you are using 40 subnets and advertise a /8 it can also cause problems down the road, because essentially you just used up the whole class A address at that one spot, so if later you want to use more subnets elsewhere you need to do something different.

Hope that helps.

Author Comment

ID: 39961704
That makes a lot of sense what you just explained. Thank you.

Featured Post

PeopleSoft Has Never Been Easier

PeopleSoft Adoption Made Smooth & Simple!

On-The-Job Training Is made Intuitive & Easy With WalkMe's On-Screen Guidance Tool.  Claim Your Free WalkMe Account Now

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

When it comes to security, there are always trade-offs between security and convenience/ease of administration. This article examines some of the main pros and cons of using key authentication vs password authentication for hosting an SFTP server.
For many of us, the  holiday season kindles the natural urge to give back to our friends, family members and communities. While it's easy for friends to notice the impact of such deeds, understanding the contributions of businesses and enterprises i…
In this brief tutorial Pawel from AdRem Software explains how you can quickly find out which services are running on your network, or what are the IP addresses of servers responsible for each service. Software used is freeware NetCrunch Tools (https…
Monitoring a network: why having a policy is the best policy? Michael Kulchisky, MCSE, MCSA, MCP, VTSP, VSP, CCSP outlines the enormous benefits of having a policy-based approach when monitoring medium and large networks. Software utilized in this v…

687 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question