Solved

Remote Desktop Services on windows 2012 R2

Posted on 2014-04-01
2
513 Views
Last Modified: 2014-04-05
Hi Guys

I'm planning to install a Remote Desktop services VM running on Hyper V and I always use the Role-based or feature-based installation but I was wondering how the Remote Desktop Services installation is any different at the end.
I see most peoples use the Remote Desktop services installation.
How is that different?
I never use it before.
I want users to use it as a traditional terminal serve were they RDP and use Office and other apps installed. I don't think I will install the remote web rdp but never know.
0
Comment
Question by:infedonetwork
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
2 Comments
 
LVL 6

Expert Comment

by:rick81
ID: 39971556
below are a couple of articles on remote desktop services.  this used to be called terminal services in early version before 2008.  i too use the role based install and it works fine.  

im not too sure about the RDP services side of things, dont remember that option.

i dont use the web rdp either.  this just allows users to access rdp via a url.  might be a good choice for users not running windows who dont have remote desktop connection.


http://technet.microsoft.com/en-au/windowsserver/ee236407.aspx

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/video/remote-desktop-services-rds-explained.aspx
0
 
LVL 58

Accepted Solution

by:
Cliff Galiher earned 500 total points
ID: 39971585
The wizard based installation is new in 2012 and didn't even exist in prior versions.

As far as what is different, technically you can use the roles and services path and end up with the exact same configuration as the wizard. And some advanced scenarios can *only* be done by going that route.

But also new in 2012, RDS is far more integrated in Active Directory, and in most cases, the wizard covers most deployment topologies. And going the roles and features path leaves the door wide open for sysadmins to configure RDS improperly if they don't understand or aren't familiar with the new dependencies and integration points in 2012.

So while the wizard isn't technically necessary and you can (if you do things very carefully) get exactly the same configuration by going the manual route, the wizard is an option that is safer, easier, and in most cases faster. Unless you really have an oddball topology that NEEDS manual configuration, I recommend avoiding the roles and features path,
0

Featured Post

Revamp Your Training Process

Drastically shorten your training time with WalkMe's advanced online training solution that Guides your trainees to action.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Restoring deleted objects in Active Directory has been a standard feature in Active Directory for many years, yet some admins may not know what is available.
While rebooting windows server 2003 server , it's showing "active directory rebuilding indices please wait" at startup. It took a little while for this process to complete and once we logged on not all the services were started so another reboot is …
This tutorial will walk an individual through the process of installing the necessary services and then configuring a Windows Server 2012 system as an iSCSI target. To install the necessary roles, go to Server Manager, and select Add Roles and Featu…
Windows 10 is mostly good. However the one thing that annoys me is how many clicks you have to do to dial a VPN connection. You have to go to settings from the start menu, (2 clicks), Network and Internet (1 click), Click VPN (another click) then fi…

734 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question