Solved

is sql database location as important now when using virtual servers and smart san arrays

Posted on 2014-04-03
4
256 Views
Last Modified: 2014-04-08
is it still important to locate tempdb data files log files etc all on seperate drives?
when using a virtual server with smart arrays like emc vnx5600 etc
as the lun is treated as one big disk
and emc smart array moved data to faster disks anyone
does it really matter anymore
0
Comment
Question by:dougdog
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
4 Comments
 
LVL 52

Assisted Solution

by:Carl Tawn
Carl Tawn earned 125 total points
ID: 39975211
If you are dumping all of your data onto a SAN then no, not really, from a performance perspective at least. Even when using a SAN though I would still tend to split the database across LUNs for manageability more than anything.
0
 
LVL 5

Assisted Solution

by:Steve M
Steve M earned 125 total points
ID: 39975240
Not really no - the only reason I would think on a SAN is if you have LUN sizing that is a bit restrictive, in that case you'll want to separate them so logs don't fill up your DB LUN, and also temp DB can grow quite large with heavy transactions during application upgrades etc, so sometimes it will need lots of temp room to grow.  Performance wise though, no difference.
0
 
LVL 120

Assisted Solution

by:Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert / EE MVE^2)
Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert / EE MVE^2) earned 125 total points
ID: 39975274
If all your LUNs are cut from the same spindles (SAN), performance will be the same.
0
 
LVL 69

Accepted Solution

by:
Scott Pletcher earned 125 total points
ID: 39975770
Not nearly as critical to performance anymore.

But, I think even then you can still do two (or more, if you wanted) separate raid sets.  And I strongly recommend that for SQL Server, for at least two reasons:

1) Recoverability -- critical.  For any given db, if the logs are on a different raid set than the data, you have full recoverability at all times (unless, of course, both raid sets fail at the same time, which is statistically virtually impossible).

2) Performance -- RAID 10 generally works better for log files, which are 90+% write.  RAID 5/6 generally works better for data.
0

Featured Post

The Eight Noble Truths of Backup and Recovery

How can IT departments tackle the challenges of a Big Data world? This white paper provides a roadmap to success and helps companies ensure that all their data is safe and secure, no matter if it resides on-premise with physical or virtual machines or in the cloud.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

The question appears often enough, how do I transfer my data from my old server to the new server while preserving file shares, share permissions, and NTFS permisions.  Here are my tips for handling such a transfer.
Is your phone running out of space to hold pictures?  This article will show you quick tips on how to solve this problem.
This tutorial will walk an individual through the steps necessary to enable the VMware\Hyper-V licensed feature of Backup Exec 2012. In addition, how to add a VMware server and configure a backup job. The first step is to acquire the necessary licen…
This Micro Tutorial steps you through the configuration steps to configure your ESXi host Management Network settings and test the management network, ensure the host is recognized by the DNS Server, configure a new password, and the troubleshooting…

730 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question