Cisco ASA VPN - Is there any way to get a remote remote site to pass ALL Traffic across an IPSec VPN so that a central content filter will apply?


I have a (2) Site IPSec setup, and I want to get the internet traffic from the remote site to pass to the HUB site so that the content filter at that site processes the traffic from the remote site as well.  

I have done this with IOS VPN's before (GRE over IPSec with the default route pointing to a TUNNEL interface) but I have never found a solution that will let me do this with Cisco ASA's.  Sonicwalls seem to have it covered with the checkbox "Force all traffic to remote site" in the VPN ... I can't imagine that this is not possible with a Cisco ASA, which is supposed to be a superior device and platform.  

Note:  Because of the appliance (Barracuda 410), we cannot use WCCP as an option since the Barracuda will ONLY allow one host to do WCCP.

Who is Participating?
Marius GunnerudConnect With a Mentor Senior Systems EngineerCommented:
You can define in the crypto ACL that the destination is "any".  So basically anything that matches the defined source address will be encrypted and sent over the VPN tunnel.

Just remember to adjust your nat exempt statements to also define a destination of any.
you haven't fully described your architecture so i'm assuming that you have branch sites connected via vpn with head quarter, and the site-to-site vpns are up and running.

What i usually implement to my customers is a rule on the branch offices which do not let them go out on the internet, by simply setting an access-list on internal interface.
Then i allow branch offices to surf on the internet by using proxy settings in their browsers, where the proxy IP is the Barracuda appliance which is ubicated in the head quarter LAN.

The only way to avoid the need of proxy settings for the branch offices would be to define vlans on the central ASA, and define the same vlans on the barracuda, using virtual ip address on each subnet the barracuda should serve, but it would become really complicated, especially when troubleshooting.
My customers are happy to use proxy for branch offices anyway.

hope this helps
jkeegan123Author Commented:
@MAG03:  Have you used this to accomplish this task?  This sounds like it would actually work well!
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

All Courses

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.